Misplaced Pages

:Requests for checkuser/Case/Dr.Jhingaadey: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser | Case Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:48, 31 July 2009 editTheHerbalGerbil (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers2,909 edits →Report date July 30 2009, 14:30 (UTC): strike out prior comment and reply to Hans← Previous edit Revision as of 18:37, 31 July 2009 edit undoValjean (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers95,275 edits →Report date July 30 2009, 14:30 (UTC): add linkNext edit →
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
=== <s> ] </s> ===

<s>It appears that ], who is Dr.Jhingaadey, couldn't resist the temptation and is using socks again.

* {{checkuser|117.192.134.64}}

<s>Strong suspicion based on the duck test and timing.

* {{checkuser|Dbrisinda}}</s>

<s> The RfCU page is protected, so it's impossible to comply with the request in the template.

] (]) 07:33, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

:The IP is from the same city, but from a different internet provider and almost more clueless than Dr.Jhingaadey was a year ago. Doesn't pass the duck test for me. Regarding Dbrisinda, it seems more likely to me that this is an unrelated real name account. Since outing has been defined rather liberally recently I am not going to give more details on-wiki beyond saying that it seems to be an Italian name and that I found both a homeopath and a Canadian of this name, although probably not the same person. ] ] 11:30, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

:: Then I'll strike that second one. As far as being clueless, that is a hallmark clue it is likely Dr.J. I have been amazed at just how clueless he really is. He hasn't been editing at his Avathaar acount, and he never has been able to resist the temptation to edit homeopathy subjects using IPs. The IP still needs a checkuser performed. It may well turn up some named accounts. ] (]) 14:12, 30 July 2009 (UTC) </s> See below.

The box below needs to be changed as it is historic and gives wrong instructions, including pointing to a locked page. ] (]) 14:35, 30 July 2009 (UTC) The box below needs to be changed as it is historic and gives wrong instructions, including pointing to a locked page. ] (]) 14:35, 30 July 2009 (UTC)


Line 111: Line 93:
;Comments by other users ;Comments by other users
* <strike>Judging by the number of edits (2) and the type of user (IP), I’m going to give him the benefit of the doubt for the moment and presume that he was just logged out and didn’t notice. —&nbsp;<em>]</em><sup>(])</sup>, 21:24, 30 July 2009 (UTC)</strike> * <strike>Judging by the number of edits (2) and the type of user (IP), I’m going to give him the benefit of the doubt for the moment and presume that he was just logged out and didn’t notice. —&nbsp;<em>]</em><sup>(])</sup>, 21:24, 30 July 2009 (UTC)</strike>

**This makes no sense because Dr.Jhingaadey is not allowed to edit anywhere outside his own user space and user talk space. ] ] 22:24, 30 July 2009 (UTC) :* This makes no sense because Dr.Jhingaadey is not allowed to edit anywhere outside his own user space and user talk space. ] ] 22:24, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
⚫ ***Point. I forgot that he was (still) so severely restricted.—&nbsp;<em>]</em><sup>(])</sup>, 01:48, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

⚫ *For me this does not pass the duck test because I don't recognise the internet provider as one previously used by this user (I may be wrong about this, I didn't really check), and because the IP seems to be even more clueless. But after a closer look at Avathaar's talk page I am beginning to understand why BullRangifer is suspicious in this case. ] ] 22:24, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
⚫ ::* Point. I forgot that he was (still) so severely restricted.—&nbsp;<em>]</em><sup>(])</sup>, 01:48, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

⚫ * For me this does not pass the duck test because I don't recognise the internet provider as one previously used by this user (I may be wrong about this, I didn't really check), and because the IP seems to be even more clueless. But after a closer look at Avathaar's talk page I am beginning to understand why BullRangifer is suspicious in this case. ] ] 22:24, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

:* He has been known to use internet cafes, as well as other computers, so the provider can vary. The location, the subject, and the POV all point to him. He is not supposed to edit anywhere but his own userspace at ]. Note that he has never been unblocked, and is allowed to edit there only because one admin allows it. He does seem to be active as a sock again. ] (]) 05:12, 31 July 2009 (UTC)


;CheckUser requests ;CheckUser requests

Revision as of 18:37, 31 July 2009

The box below needs to be changed as it is historic and gives wrong instructions, including pointing to a locked page. Brangifer (talk) 14:35, 30 July 2009 (UTC)


If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/Dr.Jhingaadey}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Dr.Jhingaadey: New request

It appears that Dr. Jhingaadey is making a renewed attempt to sneak his way into Misplaced Pages. The DUCK test shows a remarkable similarity to the POV, style, ignorance of science, and ignorance of Misplaced Pages policies that Jhingaadey has previously shown under all his guises. A checkuser may well reveal an IP that is similar to other IPs he has used. Another editor has already recognized him and I am just taking this a step further by bringing it here.

Relevant links:

-- Fyslee / talk 05:07, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

 Confirmed that Dr.Jhingaadey (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is Homoeopath (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Sam Korn 14:11, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

... and blocked. MastCell  16:24, 13 May 2008 (UTC)


Dr.Jhingaadey

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 05:06, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Supporting evidence:
    • diff IP 61.2.70.139 replying as User:Happening on the user's talkpage
    • diff IP 61.2.70.140 being used by banned user and sockmaster User:Dr.Jhingaadey

Single-purpose account at Homeopathy which was also the area that Dr.Jhingaadey operated in, Happening repeatedly blanking other editors' comments on Talk:Homeopathy and POV pushing. Tim Vickers (talk) 05:06, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

This one's pretty certain. Just check out the other IPs he's used:
-- Fyslee / talk 05:20, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
  • I checked the I.P.s' used by the said Dr.Jhingaadey, but my I.P. doesn't match any of those, so stop imagining things. Don't make false allegations!
  • I browse/post from a Cyber Café. Isn’t it possible that this person y’all mention has also browsed from the same place? Moreover, at this place, they keep changing their I.P. to get maximum speed, so if the person you mentioned is in the same City, the I.P.s could overlap, but please don’t hold me responsible for his behavior! — Happening (talk) 11:09, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Without running a check, it's obvious that the IP is User:Happening. It signed a post using the same signature, after all. You can't begrudge someone for accidentally logging out. With regards to the check against the accounts, the checkuser data was somewhat inconclusive, with both accounts being from the same geographical location. Isn't it funny that Happening had an explanation for that before I even mentioned it, though? It's almost like he knew the where Dr.Jhingaadey edits from, and had thought about what he'd say if he was accused! Interesting, hmm? --Deskana (talk) 11:39, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
User:Happening and two of his IPs have been refactoring and deleting embarrassing comments on User:Happening's talk page. -- Fyslee / talk 14:11, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Here's the current list:
-- Fyslee / talk 14:15, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 Clerk note: I will close this report, but I am not adding it to Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case at this time, primarily because no checkuser results were released from it as a result. Checkusers, please correct as required. Anthøny 21:50, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.



Dr.Jhingaadey again

Report date July 30 2009, 14:30 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by User:BullRangifer

Duck test. This multiple blocked user never can resist using registered and unregistered socks. See previous sockpuppet investigations and categories. He has recently been allowed (by one admin, with much disagreement from other editors) to edit using the name User:Avathaar, and only on the talk page. He hasn't been editing there for some time, and apparently couldn't resist the temptation. Incredible cluelessness is actually a characteristic of this user. He doesn't have much of a clue how to hide obvious sockpuppetry. Brangifer (talk) 14:30, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users
  • Judging by the number of edits (2) and the type of user (IP), I’m going to give him the benefit of the doubt for the moment and presume that he was just logged out and didn’t notice. — NRen2k5, 21:24, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
  • For me this does not pass the duck test because I don't recognise the internet provider as one previously used by this user (I may be wrong about this, I didn't really check), and because the IP seems to be even more clueless. But after a closer look at Avathaar's talk page I am beginning to understand why BullRangifer is suspicious in this case. Hans Adler 22:24, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
  • He has been known to use internet cafes, as well as other computers, so the provider can vary. The location, the subject, and the POV all point to him. He is not supposed to edit anywhere but his own userspace at User:Avathaar. Note that he has never been unblocked, and is allowed to edit there only because one admin allows it. He does seem to be active as a sock again. Brangifer (talk) 05:12, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
CheckUser requests

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Awaiting initial clerk review.    Requested by Brangifer (talk) 14:30, 30 July 2009 (UTC)


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


Conclusions


Categories: