Misplaced Pages

User talk:Factomancer: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:10, 4 August 2009 editFactomancer (talk | contribs)3,045 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 01:40, 4 August 2009 edit undoFactomancer (talk | contribs)3,045 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 25: Line 25:


: Come on, George. Please show me evidence of personal attacks or harassment. Show me one person other than yourself that wanted me banned. ] (]) 00:55, 4 August 2009 (UTC) : Come on, George. Please show me evidence of personal attacks or harassment. Show me one person other than yourself that wanted me banned. ] (]) 00:55, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

: It is important to note that ] was involved in a content dispute with me on ] so this block represents a clear ]. He should have waited for an uninvolved admin to deal with this. ] (]) 01:40, 4 August 2009 (UTC)


{{unblock|I have not made any personal attacks against Wikifan12345. This is not a single purpose account either, I edit on a great deal of articles. I don't see how I am being disruptive either. I am simply following the dispute resolution procedure and participating in a discussion involving a large number of people about Wikifan12345's conduct. <br><br> {{unblock|I have not made any personal attacks against Wikifan12345. This is not a single purpose account either, I edit on a great deal of articles. I don't see how I am being disruptive either. I am simply following the dispute resolution procedure and participating in a discussion involving a large number of people about Wikifan12345's conduct. <br><br>

Revision as of 01:40, 4 August 2009

Thanks

Thanks for removing the comments. I saw your applied-then-deleted one. If you have concerns about edit-warring, you should bring them up on an administrator's noticeboard. I have no reason to assume bad faith from GHcool, and while you are welcome to do what you want, I generally find that assuming bad faith creates more problems than it solves. Awickert (talk) 04:18, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

No problem. Factsontheground (talk) 04:22, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks! Awickert (talk) 16:37, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Both you and Wikifan12345 blocked for a week for personal attacks and disruption

The dispute has exceeded reasonable bounds, both in civility of each of you towards the other, and in disruptive activity on WP:ANI.

I am going to ask for review of this on ANI but I expect that both blocks will be upheld by consensus there.

Both of your accounts are behaving like Single-Purpose Accounts - Per Misplaced Pages:Single-purpose account and related policy, accounts which are single purpose and highly disruptive can be indefinitely blocked from editing. That policy is also possibly applicable here.

Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 00:26, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Georgewilliamherbert, I don't understand how you could have read the discussion at WP:ANI and concluded that I was in any way harassing or attacking Wikifan12345. The vast majority of comments there agree that Wikifan12345 has caused disruption on a number of articles. Nobody except for you has proposed that I be blocked. How can you block me with no basis whatsoever in the discussion? How can you possibly think that this is correct?
My edits today were simply in reply to User:Awickert's request for diffs. Remove them if you want. It makes no difference to me.
Can you please provide you reasoning here because I do not understand it whatsoever?
Please, Georgewilliamherbert, can you list the statements that I have made that constitute personal attacks or harassment against Wikifan12345?

Factsontheground (talk) 00:44, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Come on, George. Please show me evidence of personal attacks or harassment. Show me one person other than yourself that wanted me banned. Factsontheground (talk) 00:55, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
It is important to note that User:Georgewilliamherbert was involved in a content dispute with me on Talk:List of terrorist incidents, 2009 so this block represents a clear conflict of interest. He should have waited for an uninvolved admin to deal with this. Factsontheground (talk) 01:40, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

This user is asking that her block be reviewed:

Factomancer (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have not made any personal attacks against Wikifan12345. This is not a single purpose account either, I edit on a great deal of articles. I don't see how I am being disruptive either. I am simply following the dispute resolution procedure and participating in a discussion involving a large number of people about Wikifan12345's conduct.

Far from being "disruptive at ANI" I have made very few edits in that discussion. The edits I made today were specifically requested by User:Awickert.

I was simply responding to his request. If you are unhappy with the material I added to that page then remove it. It makes no difference to me.



Please read the WP:ANI entry and you will see that the vast majority of people involved in this dispute recognize and agree that Wikifan12345 is the problem, not me.



Please, Georgewilliamherbert, can you list the statements that I have made that constitute personal attacks or harassment against Wikifan12345?



It frustrates me that from the beginning I have gone out of my way to follow Misplaced Pages policy to the letter and avoid personal attacks, even in the face of extreme provocation, and yet I'm being treated exactly the same as an individual that has been involved in far more disputes than I have with far more people and who has a much larger block log. How is that justice?

If I am unblocked I will gladly correct my behaviour if someone can inform me what it is that I did wrong here.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I have not made any personal attacks against Wikifan12345. This is not a single purpose account either, I edit on a great deal of articles. I don't see how I am being disruptive either. I am simply following the dispute resolution procedure and participating in a discussion involving a large number of people about Wikifan12345's conduct. <br><br> Far from being "disruptive at ANI" I have made very few edits in that discussion. The edits I made today were specifically requested by ]. <br><br> I was simply responding to his request. If you are unhappy with the material I added to that page then remove it. It makes no difference to me. <br><br> Please read the WP:ANI entry and you will see that the vast majority of people involved in this dispute recognize and agree that Wikifan12345 is the problem, not me. <br><br> Please, Georgewilliamherbert, can you list the statements that I have made that constitute personal attacks or harassment against Wikifan12345? <br><br> It frustrates me that from the beginning I have gone out of my way to follow Misplaced Pages policy to the letter and avoid personal attacks, even in the face of extreme provocation, and yet I'm being treated exactly the same as an individual that has been involved in far more disputes than I have with far more people and who has a much larger block log. How is that justice? <br><br> If I am unblocked I will gladly correct my behaviour if someone can inform me what it is that I did wrong here.  |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have not made any personal attacks against Wikifan12345. This is not a single purpose account either, I edit on a great deal of articles. I don't see how I am being disruptive either. I am simply following the dispute resolution procedure and participating in a discussion involving a large number of people about Wikifan12345's conduct. <br><br> Far from being "disruptive at ANI" I have made very few edits in that discussion. The edits I made today were specifically requested by ]. <br><br> I was simply responding to his request. If you are unhappy with the material I added to that page then remove it. It makes no difference to me. <br><br> Please read the WP:ANI entry and you will see that the vast majority of people involved in this dispute recognize and agree that Wikifan12345 is the problem, not me. <br><br> Please, Georgewilliamherbert, can you list the statements that I have made that constitute personal attacks or harassment against Wikifan12345? <br><br> It frustrates me that from the beginning I have gone out of my way to follow Misplaced Pages policy to the letter and avoid personal attacks, even in the face of extreme provocation, and yet I'm being treated exactly the same as an individual that has been involved in far more disputes than I have with far more people and who has a much larger block log. How is that justice? <br><br> If I am unblocked I will gladly correct my behaviour if someone can inform me what it is that I did wrong here.  |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have not made any personal attacks against Wikifan12345. This is not a single purpose account either, I edit on a great deal of articles. I don't see how I am being disruptive either. I am simply following the dispute resolution procedure and participating in a discussion involving a large number of people about Wikifan12345's conduct. <br><br> Far from being "disruptive at ANI" I have made very few edits in that discussion. The edits I made today were specifically requested by ]. <br><br> I was simply responding to his request. If you are unhappy with the material I added to that page then remove it. It makes no difference to me. <br><br> Please read the WP:ANI entry and you will see that the vast majority of people involved in this dispute recognize and agree that Wikifan12345 is the problem, not me. <br><br> Please, Georgewilliamherbert, can you list the statements that I have made that constitute personal attacks or harassment against Wikifan12345? <br><br> It frustrates me that from the beginning I have gone out of my way to follow Misplaced Pages policy to the letter and avoid personal attacks, even in the face of extreme provocation, and yet I'm being treated exactly the same as an individual that has been involved in far more disputes than I have with far more people and who has a much larger block log. How is that justice? <br><br> If I am unblocked I will gladly correct my behaviour if someone can inform me what it is that I did wrong here.  |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Category: