Misplaced Pages

Sujiatun Thrombosis Hospital: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:21, 7 August 2009 editOhconfucius (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers328,947 edits →Organ-harvesting allegations: Harry Wu needs to go here - he's in the lead← Previous edit Revision as of 08:22, 7 August 2009 edit undoOlaf Stephanos (talk | contribs)3,152 edits ...and just to keep the viewpoints in balanceNext edit →
Line 11: Line 11:
Independent reports by unaffiliated organizations generally agreed that there was no evidence of live organ harvesting at Sujiatun. ], known vocal critic of the Chinese government and its human rights record, also expressed doubts about the existence of a concentration camp at Sujiatun, stating that the evidence was insubstantial, the supposed eyewitness accounts inconsistent, the facilities at Sujiatun not amenable to such a large-scale operation, and the anonymous witnesses not credible.<ref name=challenge>{{cite web | url=http://www.cicus.org/info_eng/artshow.asp?ID=6492 | title=Statement of Harry Wu about Sujiatun issue | last=Wu | first=Harry | Observechina.net | date=8 June 2006 | accessdate=2008-10-21}}</ref> The ] dismissed claims of there being a "concentration camp" at Sujiatun,<ref>{{cite web | title=U.S. Finds No Evidence of Alleged Concentration Camp in China Repression of Falun Gong | date=16 April 2006 | url=http://www.america.gov/st/washfile-english/2006/None/20060416141157uhyggep0.5443231.html | accessdate=2008-10-21 | work=}}</ref> According to a report by the United States ], U.S. officials investigated the facility twice and found no evidence that it was being used for organ harvesting or detaining prisoners.<ref name=CRS>{{cite web | title=China and Falun Gong | url=http://www.usembassy.it/pdf/other/RL33437.pdf | date=11 August 2006 | page=10 | accessdate=2008-10-21 | publisher=] | last=Lum | first=Thomas}}</ref> ] stated that the claims could be neither confirmed nor denied.<ref name=CRS/> As the hospital is a joint venture with a company associated with the Malaysian government, Malay officials also visited the clinic and found it to be a hospital, not a concentration camp. Independent reports by unaffiliated organizations generally agreed that there was no evidence of live organ harvesting at Sujiatun. ], known vocal critic of the Chinese government and its human rights record, also expressed doubts about the existence of a concentration camp at Sujiatun, stating that the evidence was insubstantial, the supposed eyewitness accounts inconsistent, the facilities at Sujiatun not amenable to such a large-scale operation, and the anonymous witnesses not credible.<ref name=challenge>{{cite web | url=http://www.cicus.org/info_eng/artshow.asp?ID=6492 | title=Statement of Harry Wu about Sujiatun issue | last=Wu | first=Harry | Observechina.net | date=8 June 2006 | accessdate=2008-10-21}}</ref> The ] dismissed claims of there being a "concentration camp" at Sujiatun,<ref>{{cite web | title=U.S. Finds No Evidence of Alleged Concentration Camp in China Repression of Falun Gong | date=16 April 2006 | url=http://www.america.gov/st/washfile-english/2006/None/20060416141157uhyggep0.5443231.html | accessdate=2008-10-21 | work=}}</ref> According to a report by the United States ], U.S. officials investigated the facility twice and found no evidence that it was being used for organ harvesting or detaining prisoners.<ref name=CRS>{{cite web | title=China and Falun Gong | url=http://www.usembassy.it/pdf/other/RL33437.pdf | date=11 August 2006 | page=10 | accessdate=2008-10-21 | publisher=] | last=Lum | first=Thomas}}</ref> ] stated that the claims could be neither confirmed nor denied.<ref name=CRS/> As the hospital is a joint venture with a company associated with the Malaysian government, Malay officials also visited the clinic and found it to be a hospital, not a concentration camp.

However, the organ harvesting allegations in general were not dismissed, and have still been found credible by Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine<ref>Tom Treasure, "The Falun Gong, organ transplantation, the holocaust and ourselves," JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE Volume 100 March 2007 J R Soc Med 2007;100:119–121</ref>, and others. See the ].


==References== ==References==

Revision as of 08:22, 7 August 2009

Location of Liaoning, the province in which the Sujiatun hospital is located

The Sujiatun Thrombosis Hospital is a public hospital located in the Sujiatun district of Shenyang, in northeast China.

The hospital became the subject of allegations in March 2006 when the Falun Gong-affiliated journal The Epoch Times published allegations that it was the location of a "concentration camp where Falun Gong practitioners had their organs forcibly removed". The government of the People's Republic of China denied the allegations, and investigations by the United States Department of State and human rights activist Harry Wu did not find evidence to support them.

Organ-harvesting allegations

See also: Reports of organ harvesting from Falun Gong practitioners in China

In March 2006, the Falun Gong affiliated Epoch Times reported an unidentified Chinese journalist claiming that he had discovered a secret underground prison beneath the hospital, where as many as 6,000 Falun Gong practitioners were being held for organ harvesting.

Independent reports by unaffiliated organizations generally agreed that there was no evidence of live organ harvesting at Sujiatun. Harry Wu, known vocal critic of the Chinese government and its human rights record, also expressed doubts about the existence of a concentration camp at Sujiatun, stating that the evidence was insubstantial, the supposed eyewitness accounts inconsistent, the facilities at Sujiatun not amenable to such a large-scale operation, and the anonymous witnesses not credible. The United States Department of State dismissed claims of there being a "concentration camp" at Sujiatun, According to a report by the United States Congressional Research Service, U.S. officials investigated the facility twice and found no evidence that it was being used for organ harvesting or detaining prisoners. Amnesty International stated that the claims could be neither confirmed nor denied. As the hospital is a joint venture with a company associated with the Malaysian government, Malay officials also visited the clinic and found it to be a hospital, not a concentration camp.

However, the organ harvesting allegations in general were not dismissed, and have still been found credible by Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, and others. See the main article.

References

  1. Gertz, Bill (24 March 2006). "China harvesting inmates' organs, journalist says". Washington Times. Retrieved 2008-10-21.
  2. Ji Da (17 March 2006). "New Witness Confirms Existence of Chinese Concentration Camp, Says Organs Removed from Live Victims". The Epoch Times. Retrieved 2008-10-21.
  3. Nordlinger, Jay (30 March 2006). "A Place Called Sujiatun". National Review. Retrieved 2008-10-21.
  4. Wu, Harry (8 June 2006). "Statement of Harry Wu about Sujiatun issue". Retrieved 2008-10-21. {{cite web}}: Text "Observechina.net" ignored (help)
  5. "U.S. Finds No Evidence of Alleged Concentration Camp in China Repression of Falun Gong". Washington File. 16 April 2006. Retrieved 2008-10-21. {{cite web}}: External link in |work= (help)
  6. ^ Lum, Thomas (11 August 2006). "China and Falun Gong" (PDF). Congressional Research Service. p. 10. Retrieved 2008-10-21.
  7. Tom Treasure, "The Falun Gong, organ transplantation, the holocaust and ourselves," JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE Volume 100 March 2007 J R Soc Med 2007;100:119–121

Categories: