Islamofascism: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 12:26, 8 August 2009 editPelleSmith (talk \| contribs)7,078 edits →Origins of "Islamofascism": remove section which is not explicitly about the neologism ... but "related terms"← Previous edit		Revision as of 12:29, 8 August 2009 edit undoPelleSmith (talk \| contribs)7,078 edits →The analogy with Fascism: remove ... this is OR unless it is directly linked to the discussion of this neologismNext edit →
Line 7:		Line 7:

	{{cquote\|The most obvious points of comparison would be these: Both movements are based on a cult of murderous violence that exalts death and destruction and despises the life of the mind. ("Death to the intellect! Long live death!" as Gen. Francisco Franco's sidekick Gonzalo Queipo de Llano so pithily phrased it.) Both are hostile to modernity (except when it comes to the pursuit of weapons), and both are bitterly nostalgic for past empires and lost glories. Both are obsessed with real and imagined "humiliations" and thirsty for revenge. Both are chronically infected with the toxin of anti-Jewish paranoia (interestingly, also, with its milder cousin, anti-Freemason paranoia). Both are inclined to leader worship and to the exclusive stress on the power of one great book. Both have a strong commitment to sexual repression—especially to the repression of any sexual "deviance"—and to its counterparts the subordination of the female and contempt for the feminine. Both despise art and literature as symptoms of degeneracy and decadence; both burn books and destroy museums and treasures. - Slate.com <ref name="CH1022"/>}}		{{cquote\|The most obvious points of comparison would be these: Both movements are based on a cult of murderous violence that exalts death and destruction and despises the life of the mind. ("Death to the intellect! Long live death!" as Gen. Francisco Franco's sidekick Gonzalo Queipo de Llano so pithily phrased it.) Both are hostile to modernity (except when it comes to the pursuit of weapons), and both are bitterly nostalgic for past empires and lost glories. Both are obsessed with real and imagined "humiliations" and thirsty for revenge. Both are chronically infected with the toxin of anti-Jewish paranoia (interestingly, also, with its milder cousin, anti-Freemason paranoia). Both are inclined to leader worship and to the exclusive stress on the power of one great book. Both have a strong commitment to sexual repression—especially to the repression of any sexual "deviance"—and to its counterparts the subordination of the female and contempt for the feminine. Both despise art and literature as symptoms of degeneracy and decadence; both burn books and destroy museums and treasures. - Slate.com <ref name="CH1022"/>}}

	=== Historical scholars' definition of Fascism ===
	After sixty years of academic study and debate, historical scholars of Fascism agree in the main on the following list of core attributes of the Fascist ideology. None of the qualities listed below are reflected in the list offered by the proponents of the term 'Islamofascism', above.

	* It comprises a ] and ] ] political ideology<ref> Girvin, Brian. ''The Right in the Twentieth Century''. Pinter, 1994. Pp. 83. Describes fascism as an "anti-liberal radical authoritarian nationalist movement".</ref><ref>Turner, Henry Ashby. ''Reappraisals of Fascism''. New Viewpoints, 1975. Pp. 162. States fascism's "goals of radical and authoritarian nationalism". </ref><ref>Payne, Stanley. Fascism in Spain, 1923-1977. Univ of Wisconsin Press, 1992. Pp. 43. Payne describes Spanish fascist ]'s objectives, saying "Young José Antonio's primary political passion was and would long remain the vindication of his father's work, which he was now trying to conceptualize in a radical, authoritarian nationalist form."</ref><ref>Larsen, Stein Ugelvik; Hagtvet, Bernt; Myklebust, Jan Petter. ''Who were the Fascists: social roots of European Fascism''. Pp. 424. This reference calls fascism an "organized form of integrative radical nationalist authoritarianism".</ref> and a ] economic ideology.<ref>E.g. Noel O'Sullivan's five major themes of fascism are: corporatism, revolution, the leader principle, messianic faith, and autarky. The Fascism Reader by Aristotle A. Kallis says, "1. Corporatism. The most important claim made by fascism was that it alone could offer the creative prospect of a 'third way' between capitalism and socialism. ], in '']'', spoke enthusiastically about the 'National Socialist corporative idea' as one which would eventually 'take the place of ruinous class warfare'; whilst ], in typically extravagant fashion, declared that 'the Corporative System is destined to become the civilization of the twentieth century.'"</ref>
	* In the economic sphere, many fascist leaders have claimed to support a "]" in economic policy, which they believed superior to both the rampant ] of ] and the severe control of ].<ref>Peter Davies, Derek Lynch. The Routledge Companion to Fascism and the Far Right. Routledge, 2002. p. 146</ref><ref>Heywood, Andrew. Key Concepts in Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, 2000. p. 78</ref> This was to be achieved by establishing significant government control over business and labour (] called his nation's system "the corporate state").<ref>Rao, B. V. History of Modern Europe Ad 1789-2002. Sterling Publishers Pvt. Ltd, 2006. p. 215</ref><ref>E.g. Noel O'Sullivan's five major themes of fascism are: corporatism, revolution, the leader principle, messianic faith, and ]. The Fascism Reader by Aristotle A. Kallis says, "1. Corporatism. The most important claim made by fascism was that it alone could offer the creative prospect of a 'third way' between capitalism and socialism. Hitler, in Mein Kampf, spoke enthusiastically about the 'National Socialist corporative idea' as one which would eventually 'take the place of ruinous class warfare'; whilst Mussolini, in typically extravagant fashion, declared that 'the Corporative System is destined to become the civilization of the twentieth century.'"</ref>
	* It is much defined by what it opposes, what scholars call the ''fascist negations'' - its opposition to ],<ref>"Fascism." The Blackwell Dictionary of Sociology. Editor Allan G. Johnson. Wiley-Blackwell, 2000. p. 119</ref> ], ], ] and ]. <ref>Heywood , Andrew , p. 57, Palgrave Macmillan 2000</ref>
	* It is the belief that nations and/or races are in perpetual conflict whereby only the strong can survive by being healthy, ], and by asserting themselves in conflict against the weak.<ref>Hawkins, Mike. Social Darwinism in European and American Thought, 1860-1945: Nature as Model and Nature as Threat. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. p. 285. "Conflict is in fact the basic law of life in all social organisms, as it is of all biological ones; societies are formed, gain strength, and move forwards through conflict; the healthiest and most vital of them assert themselves against the weakest and less well adapted through conflict; the natural evolution of nations and races takes place through conflict." Alfredo Rocco, Italian Fascist theorist and government minister.</ref>
	* It advocates the creation of a ].<ref>De Grand, Alexander. ''Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany: the "fascist" style of rule''. Routledge, 2004. Pp. 28.</ref>
	* Its governments forbid and suppress criticism and opposition to the government and the fascist movement.<ref> Kent, Allen; Lancour, Harold; Nasri, William Z. ''Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science: Volume 62 - Supplement 25 - Automated Discourse Generation to the User-Centered Revolution: 1970-1995.'' CRC Press, 1998. ISBN 0824720628, 9780824720629. p. 69.</ref>
	* It opposes ], blames ] ] for its creation and ] for exploiting the concept.<ref name="books.google.com">Welch, David. Modern European History, 1871-2000. p. 57. (Speaks of fascism opposing capitalism for creating class conflict and communism for exploiting class conflict).</ref>

	Scholars of historical Fascism came to rough agreement by the 1990s as to common elements in fascist movements. The term ] has been used as a pejorative word since the ].<ref>Gregor, Mussolini's Intellectuals: Fascist Social and Political Thought, Princeton University Press, 2005 ISBN 0691120099 282 pages, page 4</ref>

	== Comment and controversy ==		== Comment and controversy ==

Revision as of 12:29, 8 August 2009

The term Islamofascism is a neologism which draws an analogy between the ideological characteristics of specific Islamist movements from the turn of the 21st century on, and a broad range of European fascist movements of the early 20th century, neofascist movements, or totalitarianism.

The analogy with Fascism

Proponents of the phrase argue that there are similarities between historical fascism and Islamofascism, The list offered by Christopher Hitchens shows no qualities in common with the defining principles of fascism:

The most obvious points of comparison would be these: Both movements are based on a cult of murderous violence that exalts death and destruction and despises the life of the mind. ("Death to the intellect! Long live death!" as Gen. Francisco Franco's sidekick Gonzalo Queipo de Llano so pithily phrased it.) Both are hostile to modernity (except when it comes to the pursuit of weapons), and both are bitterly nostalgic for past empires and lost glories. Both are obsessed with real and imagined "humiliations" and thirsty for revenge. Both are chronically infected with the toxin of anti-Jewish paranoia (interestingly, also, with its milder cousin, anti-Freemason paranoia). Both are inclined to leader worship and to the exclusive stress on the power of one great book. Both have a strong commitment to sexual repression—especially to the repression of any sexual "deviance"—and to its counterparts the subordination of the female and contempt for the feminine. Both despise art and literature as symptoms of degeneracy and decadence; both burn books and destroy museums and treasures. - Slate.com

Comment and controversy

Criticism

The term, "Islamofascism" has been criticized by scholars and journalists alike. It is considered historically inaccurate and simplistic by scholars of history and politics., and is criticized as being generally used as a pejorative or for propaganda purposes.

Critics such as former National Review columnist Joseph Sobran, and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman argue that "Islamofascism is nothing but an empty propaganda term." used by proponents of the "War on Terror". Security expert Daniel Benjamin, political scientist Norman Finkelstein and The American Conservative columnist Daniel Larison, highlight the claim that despite its use as a piece of propaganda the term is inherently meaningless, since as Benjamin notes, "there is no sense in which jihadists embrace fascist ideology as it was developed by Mussolini or anyone else who was associated with the term."

Cultural historian Richard Webster has argued that grouping many different political ideologies, terrorist and insurgent groups, governments, and religious sects into one single idea of "Islamofascism" may lead to an oversimplification of the phenomenon of terrorism. In a similar vein the left-wing National Security Network argues that the term dangerously obscures important distinctions and differences between groups of Islamic extremists while alienating moderate voices in the Muslim world because it "creates the perception that the United States is fighting a religious war against Islam." Daniel Larison attributes proponent Hitchen's support of the phrase to his anti-religious stance. Conservative British historian Niall Ferguson points out that this political use of what he calls a "completely misleading concept," is "just a way of making us feel that we're the 'greatest generation' fighting another World War." Reza Aslan claims the term "falls flat" when describing groups like al-Qaeda, noting that they are anti-nationalist while fascism is ultra-nationalist.

Commenting on the claimed incongruity between the "Muslim World" and "industrial state fascism," US journalist Eric Margolis claims that ironically the most totalitarian Islamic regimes, "in fact, are America's allies."

The public use of the term has also elicited a critical response from various Muslim groups. In the aftermath of the 2006 transatlantic aircraft plot, George W. Bush described his policies as a battle against "Islamic fascists... will use any means to destroy those of us who love freedom". The Council on American-Islamic Relations wrote to him to complain, saying that the use of the term "feeds the perception that the war on terror is actually a war on Islam". Ingrid Mattson of the Islamic Society of North America also complained about this speech, claiming that it added to a misunderstanding of Islam. Mattson did acknowledge, however, that some terrorist groups also misuse "Islamic concepts and terms to justify their violence."

The controversy surrounding this neologism is not only confined to the critical commentary of media figures, academics and Muslim groups. In 2007, the conservative writer and activist David Horowitz launched a series of lectures and protests on college campuses under the title of "Islamofascism Awareness Week.". At least 40 universities moved officially to distance themselves from the event. Several Muslims and non-Muslims on different college campuses aware of the event came out in opposition to it. The Muslim Student Group at Penn State University, for instance, said it feared "that this Islamophobic program will have hazardous consequences on the Penn State community." At least one campus "Republican" group has also gone on record to distance themselves from the event.

In April 2008, Associated Press reported that US federal agencies, including the State Department and the Department of Homeland Security, were advised to stop using the term 'Islamo-fascism' in a 14-point memo issued by the Extremist Messaging Branch, a department of another federal body known as the National Counterterrorism Center. Aimed at improving the presentation of the "War on Terrorism" before Muslim audiences and the media, the memo states: "We are communicating with, not confronting, our audiences. Don't insult or confuse them with pejorative terms such as 'Islamo-fascism,' which are considered offensive by many Muslims."

One of the world's leading authorities on fascism, Walter Laqueur, after reviewing this and related terms, concluded that "Islamic fascism, Islamophobia and antisemitism, each in its way, are imprecise terms we could well do without but it is doubtful whether they can be removed from our political lexicon."

Support

US author and Nixon speechwriter William Safire wrote that the term fulfills a need for a term to distinguish traditional Islam from terrorists: "Islamofascism may have legs: the compound defines those terrorists who profess a religious mission while embracing totalitarian methods and helps separate them from devout Muslims who want no part of terrorist means." Christopher Hitchens has also publicly defended the term in Slate, noting along with the fact that he finds the comparison apt, that the names for other forms of religious fascism, like clerical fascism have a less contested existence.

Author Malise Ruthven, a Scottish writer and historian who focuses his work on religion and Islamic affairs, opposes redefining Islamism as `Islamofascism`, but also finds the resemblances between the two ideologies "compelling".

Origins of "Islamofascism"

The term "Islamofascism" is included in the New Oxford American Dictionary, defining it as "a controversial term equating some modern Islamic movements with the European fascist movements of the early twentieth century".

The origins of the term are uncertain. Albert Scardino claims that "Islamo-fascism" was coined by Muslim scholar Khalid Duran in a Washington Times piece, where "the word was meant as a criticism of hyper-traditionalist clerics". Radio talk-show host and vocal critic of radical Islam Michael Savage claims that he coined the term in one of his commentaries and that today's common use of the term sprang from his use of same. In 1990 the term was also used by Scottish historian Malise Ruthven who wrote in The Independent that, "authoritarian government, not to say Islamo-fascism, is the rule rather than the exception from Morocco to Pakistan."

Examples of use

"It is right for us to be on the offense against Islamofascism, and not wait until they attack us on our soil. Unlike any war we have ever fought in this nation, this is not a war for soil. It is a war for our soul. We will either win it or we will lose it. This nation must rally to the point where we recognize there is no compromise. There is no alternative. We must win; they must lose. Islamofascism must disappear from the face of the earth, or we will." — Mike Huckabee
"What we have to understand is ... this is not really a war against terrorism, this is not really a war against al Qaeda, this is a war against movements and ideologies that are jihadist, that are Islamofascists, that aim to destroy the Western world." — Clifford May
" attacks serve a clear and focused ideology, a set of beliefs and goals that are evil, but not insane. Some call this evil Islamic radicalism; others, militant Jihadism; still others, Islamo-fascism. Whatever it's called, this ideology is very different from the religion of Islam. This form of radicalism exploits Islam to serve a violent, political vision: the establishment, by terrorism and subversion and insurgency, of a totalitarian empire that denies all political and religious freedom." — George W. Bush

References

Berman, Paul (2003). Terror and Liberalism. W W Norton & Company. ISBN 0-393-05775-5.
Cite error: The named reference CH1022 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ "Niall Ferguson Interview: Conversations with History)". Institute of International Studies, UC Berkeley. 2006. Retrieved 2007-10-12. "…what we see at the moment is an attempt to interpret our present predicament in a rather caricatured World War II idiom. I mean, “Islamofascism” illustrates the point well, because it’s a completely misleading concept. In fact, there’s virtually no overlap between the ideology of al Qaeda and fascism. It’s just a way of making us feel that we’re the “greatest generation” fighting another World War, like the war our fathers and grandfathers fought. You’re translating a crisis symbolized by 9/11 into a sort of pseudo World War II. So, 9/11 becomes Pearl Harbor and then you go after the bad guys who are the fascists, and if you don’t support us, then you must be an appeaser."
Angelo Codevilla. Advice to War Presidents. Public Affairs. p. 25."...the term "Islamofascism," used to describe strongly anti-Western movements in the Muslim world, betrays ignorance of those movements as well as of Islam and Fascism."}}
^ Sobran, Joe. "Words in Wartime". Retrieved 2006-04-18. "Islamofascism is nothing but an empty propaganda term. And wartime propaganda is usually, if not always, crafted to produce hysteria, the destruction of any sense of proportion. Such words, undefined and unmeasured, are used by people more interested in making us lose our heads than in keeping their own."
Richard Alan Nelson (1996 url = http://books.google.com/books?id=ySwYAAAAIAAJ&q=A+Chronology+and+Glossary+of+Propaganda+in+the+United+States&dq=A+Chronology+and+Glossary+of+Propaganda+in+the+United+States). A Chronology and Glossary of Propaganda in the United States. {{cite book}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); External link in |date= (help); Missing pipe in: |date= (help) "Propaganda is neutrally defined as a systematic form of purposeful persuasion that attempts to influence the emotions, attitudes, opinions, and actions of specified target audiences for ideological, political or commercial purposes through the controlled transmission of one-sided messages (which may or may not be factual) via mass and direct media channels. A propaganda organization employs propagandists who engage in propagandism—the applied creation and distribution of such forms of persuasion."
Rall, Ted. "Bush's war on history and to…toma…tomatotarianism". Retrieved 2007-07-28.
Paul Krugman. "Fearing Fear Itself". New York Times. Retrieved 2007-10-29. "...there isn’t actually any such thing as Islamofascism — it’s not an ideology; it’s a figment of the neocon imagination. The term came into vogue only because it was a way for Iraq hawks to gloss over the awkward transition from pursuing Osama bin Laden, who attacked America, to Saddam Hussein, who didn’t."
^ Richard Allen Greene (12 August 2006). "Bush's language angers US Muslims". Retrieved 2007-06-28.
Wajahat Ali, 'An Interview with Norman Finkelstein' "'Islamo-fascism' is a meaningless term. If I am not mistaken, it was coined by the commentator Christopher Hitchens. The term is a throwback to when juvenile leftists, myself among them, labeled everyone we disagreed with a 'fascist pig.' So this is a kosher-halal version of that epithet. Fascism used to refer to a fairly precise historical phenomenon, although it's even doubtful that the term accurately encompasses regimes as different as Mussolini's Italy and Hitler's Germany. But when you start using the term to characterize terrorist bands who want to turn the clock back several centuries and resurrect the Caliphate, it is simply a vacuous epithet like 'Evil Empire,' 'Axis of Evil' and the rest.
Richard Webster. "Israel, Palestine and the tiger of terrorism: anti-semitism and history". New Statesman. Retrieved 2007-06-28. "The idea that there is some kind of autonomous "Islamofascism" that can be crushed, or that the west may defend itself against the terrorists who threaten it by cultivating that eagerness to kill militant Muslims which Christopher Hitchens urges upon us, is a dangerous delusion. The symptoms that have led some to apply the label of "Islamofascism" are not reasons to forget root causes. They are reasons for us to examine even more carefully what those root causes actually are."
Report: 'Islamofascism' blinds U.S. "(Islamofascism) creates the perception that the United States is fighting a religious war against Islam, thus alienating moderate voices in the region who would be willing to work with America towards common goals."
Larison, Daniel. "Term Limits". Retrieved 2008-03-13. "The word “Islamofascism” never had any meaning, except as a catch-all for whatever regimes and groups the word’s users wished to make targets for military action. Hitchens is also well known for his tendentious misunderstandings of all forms of religion, likening theism to a supernatural totalitarian regime and attributing all of the crimes of political totalitarianism to religion. It was therefore appropriate that he should promote the term “Islamofascism” since it defines a religious movement in the language of secular totalitarianism."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ew9SDNUHm_M&feature=related
Eric Margolis (2006). "The Big Lie About 'Islamic Fascism'". Retrieved 2007-07-28. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help) "There is nothing in any part of the Muslim World that resembles the corporate fascist states of western history. In fact, clan and tribal-based traditional Islamic society, with its fragmented power structures, local loyalties, and consensus decision-making, is about as far as possible from western industrial state fascism. The Muslim World is replete with brutal dictatorships, feudal monarchies, and corrupt military-run states, but none of these regimes, however deplorable, fits the standard definition of fascism. Most, in fact, are America’s allies."
"U.S. Muslim group's head says Bush's term 'Islamic fascism' adds to misunderstanding of Islam". The Associated Press. September 1, 2006. Retrieved 2007-06-28.
'Islamo-Fascism Week' Stokes Debate
U. disavows ties to Horowitz's program
The BC Heights (2007). "Controversial 'awareness week' draws criticism: 'Islamofascism' gets mixed reponses". Retrieved 2008-03-13. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
The Daily Cardinal (2007). "Diversity forum tackles advocacy issues". Retrieved 2008-03-13. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
The Daily Californian (2007). "Republican Group's Event Plans Under Fire". Retrieved 2008-03-13. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
The Dartmouth (2007). "'Islamo-fascism' speaker met with controversy". Retrieved 2008-03-13. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
The Daily Bruin (2007). "Week's focus stirring controversy: Bruin Republicans' "Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week" met with criticism from Muslim students". Retrieved 2008-03-13. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help); line feed character in |title= at position 35 (help)
Esther Kaplan, The Nation (2007). "The Culture War Descends on Columbia". Retrieved 2008-03-13. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
Muslim Student Association's Response to Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week (IFAW)
Harvard Crimson (2007). "'Islamo Fascism' Week Fails To Gain Traction". Retrieved 2008-03-13. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
"'Jihadist' booted from US government lexicon". Associated Press. April 25 2008. Retrieved 2008-04-25. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

William Safire: Islamofascism, The New York Times, October 1, 2006
Christopher Hitchens (2007). "Defending Islamofascism. It's a valid term. Here's why". Retrieved 2008-03-13. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
A Fury For God, Malise Ruthven, Granta, 2002, p.207-8
The New Oxford American Dictionary, Second Edition, Erin McKean (Editor), 2096 pages, May 2005, Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-517077-6
Scardino, Albert. "1-0 in the propaganda war". The Guardian. Retrieved 2006-04-19. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |origdate= ignored (|orig-date= suggested) (help)
"Construing Islam as a language", by Malise Ruthven, The Independent, September 8, 1990 "Nevertheless there is what might be called a political problem affecting the Muslim world. In contrast to the heirs of some other non-Western traditions, including Hinduism, Shintoism and Buddhism, Islamic societies seem to have found it particularly hard to institutionalise divergences politically: authoritarian government, not to say Islamo-fascism, is the rule rather than the exception from Morocco to Pakistan."
Mike Huckabee. "Speeches to 2008 Conservative Political Action Conference". Retrieved 2008-03-13.
Clifford May (October 12, 2004). "News from CNN with Wolf Blitzer". CNN News Transcript. Retrieved 2007-06-28.
"President Discusses War on Terror at National Endowment for Democracy". Retrieved 2006-04-19. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |origdate= ignored (|orig-date= suggested) (help)

External links

Walter Laqueur. The Origins of Fascism: Islamic Fascism, Islamophobia, Antisemitism, Oxford University Press blog.

Misplaced Pages