Misplaced Pages

Talk:LG15: The Last: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:12, 13 August 2009 editKindredPhantom (talk | contribs)179 edits Merge← Previous edit Revision as of 18:03, 13 August 2009 edit undoOtterathome (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,510 edits MergeNext edit →
Line 7: Line 7:
::Well if you are unable to find any third-party non-trivial sources about it then it fails ] so the relevant 'competition' information can be merged. If you don't think a merge is feasible with the current amount of sources then I guess it will have to be deleted.--] (]) 21:03, 12 August 2009 (UTC) ::Well if you are unable to find any third-party non-trivial sources about it then it fails ] so the relevant 'competition' information can be merged. If you don't think a merge is feasible with the current amount of sources then I guess it will have to be deleted.--] (]) 21:03, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
:::What about renegade's idea in the deletion discussion about a LG15 portal style page? Also, Otterathome the result was to keep the article, so just drop it about deleting the article. ] (]) 13:12, 13 August 2009 (UTC) :::What about renegade's idea in the deletion discussion about a LG15 portal style page? Also, Otterathome the result was to keep the article, so just drop it about deleting the article. ] (]) 13:12, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
::::Feel free to make a portal. I'll give you until next month to find more sources so it passes our guidelines, otherwise it will have to be merged or deleted, I don't mind which.--] (]) 18:03, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:03, 13 August 2009

Articles for deletionThis article was nominated for deletion on 3 August 2009. The result of the discussion was keep.

Merge

This article should now be merged with Lonelygirl15 as we still don't have any actual third-party non-trivial sources about 'The Last' show.

I respectuflly disagree. This option was just discussed in the AfD that just ended, and the result was keep. But I am going to work on substantive improvements of lg15 related articles now instead of engaging in these debates more. Cheers. --Milowent (talk) 20:52, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Well if you are unable to find any third-party non-trivial sources about it then it fails WP:N so the relevant 'competition' information can be merged. If you don't think a merge is feasible with the current amount of sources then I guess it will have to be deleted.--Otterathome (talk) 21:03, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
What about renegade's idea in the deletion discussion about a LG15 portal style page? Also, Otterathome the result was to keep the article, so just drop it about deleting the article. KindredPhantom (talk) 13:12, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Feel free to make a portal. I'll give you until next month to find more sources so it passes our guidelines, otherwise it will have to be merged or deleted, I don't mind which.--Otterathome (talk) 18:03, 13 August 2009 (UTC)