| Revision as of 20:24, 22 May 2007 editGordonWatts (talk | contribs)4,767 edits →Blocked: r Friday← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:14, 19 August 2009 edit undoRobofish (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers99,579 edits AfD nomination of Selected court cases in the Terri Schiavo case. (TW) | ||
| (21 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ] | #REDIRECT ] | ||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>I have nominated ], an article that you created, for ]. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> ] (]) 22:14, 19 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| == It's not current == | |||
| Your complaint is not current - it was flushed. So this IS the right place. --] 19:32, 22 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Falso. It was not ''my'' complaint; It was Calton's complaint. Take your discussion to thye proper forum.--] 19:41, 22 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Blocked == | |||
| I have blocked you for ]. Posted to ] for review. As far as I can tell you are doing nothign to repay the incredible wastage of time you inflict on the Misplaced Pages community. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 20:14, 22 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : Regarding , you have a conflict of interest: Step aside. (PS: I am not trying to "make" a point. I am trying to enforce policy.)--] 20:15, 22 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I agree there could be the perception of a conflict of interest here, so I have undone JzG's block. However I see no evidence at all that you're here to contribute usefully to the project, rather it looks like your goal is to waste our time, so I have blocked you from editing indefinitely. ] ] 20:19, 22 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::I was trying to contribute when Bish and Nandesuka began vandalizing my pages. When I realized they were not to blame, I asked myself "Why are they acting this way," and I reaslised that JzG slandered me and made false accusations that he had concensus when even after repeatedly beating a dead horse, and let people vote multiple times, he could not even get 50% to support any one sanction. So, since he violated "concensus" policy, I saw violation. ''Also,'' Guy used inappropriate language on his page, much worse than anything I have ever done, do I sought community action against him there too. Yes, maybe I too have a conflict of interest, but, as the victim, my right to bring action outweighs any COI concerns. However, if my only "crime" was in bringing a community action against him, you are unjustified in taking action. If you have a case, state it in the community page. But to remove my community action is violating Jimbo's orders: "Jimbo has said that "7. Anyone with a complaint should be treated with the utmost respect and dignity," so I would hope that no one wises to punish me for brining this valid complaint." This is not right.--] 20:24, 22 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:14, 19 August 2009
Redirect to:
Articles for deletion nomination of Selected court cases in the Terri Schiavo case
I have nominated Selected court cases in the Terri Schiavo case, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Selected court cases in the Terri Schiavo case. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Robofish (talk) 22:14, 19 August 2009 (UTC)