Revision as of 11:43, 20 December 2007 editMattinbgn (talk | contribs)Administrators55,970 editsm Reverted 1 edit by 58.107.166.154; Not relevant. using TW← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 10:21, 20 August 2009 edit undoBlahblah2244 (talk | contribs)8 editsmNo edit summary |
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
Line 2: |
Line 2: |
|
* ]; requiring additional references |
|
* ]; requiring additional references |
|
* ]; few references cited, more needed |
|
* ]; few references cited, more needed |
|
* ]; few references cited, more needed |
|
* ]; as above, few references cited |
|
* ]; as above, few references cited |
|
* ]; as above, few references cited |
|
* ]; no references cited at all |
|
* ]; as above, few references cited |
|
|
|
|
|
;Other |
|
;Other |
Line 11: |
Line 11: |
|
* Generally, just cleanup the article; find small things, even as small as an incorrectly-placed space or line break, date fixes, reference formatting |
|
* Generally, just cleanup the article; find small things, even as small as an incorrectly-placed space or line break, date fixes, reference formatting |
|
* Ensure that all images in the article are freely-licensed (I can't find a reason why this article should have fair use images), and that they have appropriate ]. |
|
* Ensure that all images in the article are freely-licensed (I can't find a reason why this article should have fair use images), and that they have appropriate ]. |
|
|
: After a quick check, all of the images in the article as of 6 September 2008 are (or purport to be) either freely licenced or in the public domain. There are a few issues with some of the images, but at least there aren't any obvious fair-use images in the article. |