Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
#If one partner is physically at risk, what is the safety concern for the other partner; how does that create a trust issue for the other partner?
#If one partner is physically at risk, what is the safety concern for the other partner; how does that create a trust issue for the other partner?
] (]) 04:10, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
] (]) 04:10, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
: It's most likely a typo - "trusting a partner who is physically a risk" covers a wide range of sexual assault issues (assault, rape, through to injury and infection) which is a risk a person may sadly run if they seek sexual activity with a partner that they unwisely trust or don't know.
: That said these days it could be better worded and in any event a list like this should be sourced and cited to an authoritative reliable source. ] <sup><span style="font-style:italic">(] | ])</span></sup> 05:34, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Revision as of 05:34, 31 August 2009
Pity sex was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 01 May 2009 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Human sexual activity. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
"Human sexual behaviour" is an uncommon phrase. Human sexuality includes both physical and mental "behaviours" and "feelings". Separating as physical and mental would be original research. Nowhere else on net we find such title, except wikipedia. Also lead section of the article is empty. We better merge it to human sexuality, you can refer to other dictionaries or encyclopedias. Article can be developed better if merged, it helps both in contents and editors attention. Please post your view. Thanks. Lara_bran04:27, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
This article should be deleted. It is clearly included merely to espouse positive views regarding deviant (in the statistical sense) sexual behavior. The simple fact "child sexuality" is a dominant section should indicate this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.193.254.2 (talk) 15:14, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
The decision to redirect gay sex to this page was made some time ago. I did not have the opportunity to vote on that decision, but I would have voted against it. After all, oral sex does not redirect here. Both are a part of human sexual behaviour. Gay sex is nothing to be ashamed of and should be treated like any other sex act. Punctuallylate (talk) 10:35, 28 August 2009 (UTC)Punctuallylate
You seem to be treating "gay sex" as one act. There are a number of pages relating to various sexual activities. They are not, in general, segregated by homo/hetero sexuality (though there must be exceptions such as tribadism and frot). I think treating people as people is healthier, after all safe sex is an issue for everyone. --Simon Speed (talk) 11:26, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
"a partner who is physically at risk"
In the section on Safety and ancillary issues, the first risk item is "choosing to trust a partner who is physically at risk." I don't understand this.
What is really being described here? What are the possible causes of this physical risk?
If one partner is physically at risk, what is the safety concern for the other partner; how does that create a trust issue for the other partner?
It's most likely a typo - "trusting a partner who is physically a risk" covers a wide range of sexual assault issues (assault, rape, through to injury and infection) which is a risk a person may sadly run if they seek sexual activity with a partner that they unwisely trust or don't know.
That said these days it could be better worded and in any event a list like this should be sourced and cited to an authoritative reliable source. FT205:34, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
.svg){kind=small}
