Misplaced Pages

User talk:Rm125: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:14, 3 September 2009 editJeppiz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers13,029 edits Warning, you are right back in edit-warring and disruptive editing← Previous edit Revision as of 03:48, 4 September 2009 edit undoBrewcrewer (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers55,075 edits →Non-templated welcome: new sectionNext edit →
Line 24: Line 24:
==Last warning== ==Last warning==
Despite your block and the warnings you received over your behaviour, you have went right back to edit-warring at ] and to removing sourced content without discussing it at ]. Your behaviour is just as disruptive as it was before the block and you will be heading for a new one if you don't change your behaviour immediately.] (]) 20:14, 3 September 2009 (UTC) Despite your block and the warnings you received over your behaviour, you have went right back to edit-warring at ] and to removing sourced content without discussing it at ]. Your behaviour is just as disruptive as it was before the block and you will be heading for a new one if you don't change your behaviour immediately.] (]) 20:14, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

== Non-templated welcome ==

Hey RM125, Noticed your work around here and I'm impressed. It is both intelligent and mostly in accordance with ]. You have the markings of a good Wikipedian. One thing I'd like encourage is that you hold back from reverting more then once a day, especially now that you're a new editor. There are plenty of articles that are not well written and include bad information, but we can't get all hung up at every misjustice. Patience is a virtue that will get you a long way here. If you have any specific questions, please don't hesitate to ping my talkpage. Best, --'']] ]'' 03:48, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:48, 4 September 2009

Welcome!

Hello, Rm125, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Bourge 09:59, 2 August 2009 (UTC)


Please don't leave messages here

Since seldom visit tghis page. Please discuss directly on article page.I will eventually see this page of coarse but don't count on it. Thanks --Rm125 (talk) 04:38, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

RfC

By adding the tag you are listing the article twice at the same RfC page. It is already listed so please stop adding the second tag. nableezy - 04:04, 3 September 2009 (UTC)


This is about different issue. As discussed on the page--Rm125 (talk) 04:34, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

That is your 3rd revert on Haaretz. Please stop trying to push in the material through editwarring. You will be blocked if you continue. nableezy - 16:01, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Last warning

Despite your block and the warnings you received over your behaviour, you have went right back to edit-warring at Haaretz and to removing sourced content without discussing it at Aftonbladet-Israel controversy. Your behaviour is just as disruptive as it was before the block and you will be heading for a new one if you don't change your behaviour immediately.Jeppiz (talk) 20:14, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Non-templated welcome

Hey RM125, Noticed your work around here and I'm impressed. It is both intelligent and mostly in accordance with NPOV. You have the markings of a good Wikipedian. One thing I'd like encourage is that you hold back from reverting more then once a day, especially now that you're a new editor. There are plenty of articles that are not well written and include bad information, but we can't get all hung up at every misjustice. Patience is a virtue that will get you a long way here. If you have any specific questions, please don't hesitate to ping my talkpage. Best, --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:48, 4 September 2009 (UTC)