Revision as of 11:32, 14 September 2009 view sourceHoary (talk | contribs)Administrators77,801 edits Pandey← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:20, 14 September 2009 view source Astanhope (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers5,369 edits →afd comments: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 223: | Line 223: | ||
Hello there. I can't criticize your well-intentioned renaming of an article today. Now, it may appear that I'm rather free with the scythe and the salt, but please see ], and its "project page", and the deletion review, and the AfD, and the other AfD, and etc etc etc. -- ] (]) 11:32, 14 September 2009 (UTC) | Hello there. I can't criticize your well-intentioned renaming of an article today. Now, it may appear that I'm rather free with the scythe and the salt, but please see ], and its "project page", and the deletion review, and the AfD, and the other AfD, and etc etc etc. -- ] (]) 11:32, 14 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
== afd comments == | |||
Really, now? Really? You're going to criticize the validity of my comments? My guess, somehow, is that if I had voted to delete in those cases you wouldn't have cared. Just to be clear, my comments are perfectly valid and you contacting me to tell me otherwise is petty and inappropriate. Now, quick! Get back to your pathological obsession with deleting other peoples' work! The Misplaced Pages desperately needs you! (It really doesn't.) --] (]) 12:20, 14 September 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:20, 14 September 2009
arosebyanyother
"Firstly, you can't - note that the sign says "do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself". Secondly, read the template much?" Your language is unnecessarily sarcastic. I did read the template and addressed those issues in my talk page. If you don't approve the language in my page, you're more than welcome to re-write the offending language. It would be helpful if you pointed out what exactly you feel does not meet wikipedia standards. Thank you. --arosebyanyother 02:55, 14 September 2009 (UTC) --arosebyanyother 02:50, 14 September 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by A RoseByAnyOther (talk • contribs)
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful) |
Anne Godwin
Hi. Just wanted to say thanks for your help improving the Anne Godwin page. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 10:34, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks, Godwin is OK for now. There was no paucity of info. But I'd appreciate any info. you could get on Maud Burnett that isn't already on her page. I couldn't come up with too much on her. Thanks. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 10:46, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks again. I have never submitted a DYK, but whatever you think is appropriate. I'll start looking it up (WP:DYK, I guess). Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 11:08, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- Re: Anne Wexler. I was not being disingenuous or dishonest when I told you I had never done a DYK. As far as the Wexler DYK goes, all I know is that I had made an update following her death before the article was DYKed and I was included in the notification process. I never submitted or nominated the Wexler article, and was a little surprised at being notified at all. Yours, Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 12:55, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Joey Musial
Hi, Ironholds, I just wanted to say sorry for deleting your talk page. I had a really bad day and was in a really bad mood. It won't happen again, Okay? On the 7th day, God made trekkies then, on the 8th day, he rested. (talk) 17:10, 5 September 2009 (UTC) P.S. Is my signiture okay now?
Okay, it won't. In apology, I'm giving you the apology barnstar, which I made up, and a cookie!!! sorry again, Joey Musial On the 7th day, God made trekkies then, on the 8th day, he rested. (talk) 20:13, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Joey Musial has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
Removal of PROD from Alexander Seton, 3rd Earl of Dunfermline
Hello Ironholds, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Alexander Seton, 3rd Earl of Dunfermline has been removed. It was removed by Youngamerican with the following edit summary '(Deprod, passes WP:POLITICIAN, would have been a member of the 2nd estate of the Parliament of Scotland (he lived before the Act of Union))'. Please consider discussing your concerns with Youngamerican before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 20:17, 5 September 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)
Talkback
Hello, Ironholds. You have new messages at Tim1357's talk page.You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Tim1357 (talk) 23:29, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Cookie!
Truth Lover80 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
Truth Lover80 (talk) 06:24, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Crazyjikn
Fair enough. Do you think it would have been better if I just CSD all of his articles and just ignored him? He would get frustrated (as I assume he thinks he is helping Misplaced Pages) and then would get angry and not want to contribute. The major reason I actually wrote him a message was due to him creating a number of articles (and not just one or two) and my hope was that he would stop and perhaps take a quick glance to those pages. I meant no harm.Calaka (talk) 14:13, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- OK I am sorry. I did not intend my message to be rude and I still have trouble seeing it as such (I will remove it and leave it up to someone else to write out a little note for him if they wish) and instead of telling him to stop creating articles and read, I will post the welcome message up and leave it up to him to decide whether he wants to read it or not. Furthermore if he should not read the links provided by the welcome message, then me even posting a welcome message seems a bit redundant (with those links present that is).
- Anyway point being if my NON-bot messages appear rude (when I honest to god meant well) I will refrain from doing so in the future. I guess many of the newbies will think the bot welcome message will be something I wrote out anyway so it will do. I am again sorry. Cheers.Calaka (talk) 15:01, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- Well I am sure you are aware that tone is completely random when there are no physical cues (aka on the internet and you surely heard the study that a large proportion of what is written on email has its tone misinterpreted) like smiley faces and what not, so again I meant well and did in no way meant to appear like a bully.
- Re:Bds69. Oh ok. So when he calls me a douche it doesn't matter, I shouldn't take it personal? Just because I have been here long enough. Or maybe because you know I won't be leaving when someone says something mean to me over the internet? Would your have thought differently if I was to get offended and simply leave? Can I wait 6 months and if he is still around get to call him a douche because he is not a newbie anymore? Frankly, I care very little about people that decide to insult me on the net, and I am not going to prance around all nice to them and take it (and in the end, isn’t he putting references on Misplaced Pages... which was the point of the discussion? Would he have been adding them if I didn't talk to him?). But fine. You win. I am not going to argue with you since you are right after all.
- Re: what to do with Misplaced Pages. Well no matter what you said (I am not offended in the end even though it might appear that way hehe) I still want to help Misplaced Pages. But I will refrain from making any written negative comments (speedy and bot written warnings are still OK hey!). I will make bot replies and welcome messages and only bother to write a personal message only to new users that are doing a good job. I will leave all the other newbies that need help up to the polite individuals here (which thankfully is the majority right?).
- Happy editing.Calaka (talk) 03:00, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Well done
... on your TFA :) Not often you get one of them is it? GARDEN 15:21, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- First one :). Got it promoted months back, but I haven't had a chance to stick it on the main page until now. Ironholds (talk) 15:50, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Imhotep
Imhotep is the title character of at least three separate well-known films, and one of the most iconic characters of the horror genre. Surely that counts as notable by Misplaced Pages standards?
You might wait at least a few minutes to see what a fellow editor is doing before you attempt to erase it. Nareek (talk) 16:06, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Imhotep certainly meets formal Misplaced Pages criteria for notability. There is an extensive literature on 1930s horror cinema, which discusses the character of Imhotep at length. And, no, I don't have this literature in my living room.
Do a "What links here" for Imhotep (film). Those are links that formerly went to Imhotep, a page that doesn't mention the film character, and so were wrongly directed. If you make Imhotep (film) a redirect to The Mummy (1932 film), then the references to the character that relate primarily to the 1999 film will be misplaced--and the same thing will happen if you make it a redirect to the 1999 film. It's a character that is repeatedly referred to in Misplaced Pages articles, and it appears in multiple notable works--that's why it would be helpful for it to have its own article. Nareek (talk) 16:41, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
We should all try to be pleasant when dealing with our fellow editors; if you think about for a moment, you might see why remarks like "again, missing the point" are not helpful.
Especially when I did address exactly that point: Imhotep (film) does meet the formal Misplaced Pages criteria for notability. The character has "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Do a Google Books search for "Imhotep horror," and you'll find numerous works where the character is addressed. He's one of the key icons of the horror film, along with Frankenstein's monster and Count Dracula--both of whom have their own articles independent of the fictional works they first appeared in. As does Kharis, a lesser-known embodiment of the Mummy archetype. Nareek (talk) 16:58, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Norman Birkett, 1st Baron Birkett
There appears to be an error in both this article itself and in the main-page summary of it today. See my comments on the article's talk page and in the error reports for the main page. Neutron (talk) 19:30, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Senna (Soul Reaper)
He created it by copy/pasting the first line of Bleach: Memories of Nobody. After it was tagged then redirected, he recreated it at Senna (Bleach) with more copy/pasting from the film article. He also made Blanks (Bleach) and is ignoring the notes on his talk page. How many times will he be allowed to recreate it? -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 20:37, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Tallulah Black
I've added a number of other sources (which I was in the middle searching for when you essentially deleted the article BTW) to this stub. I hope this satisfies you. :) Stephen Day (talk) 20:46, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- I've posted my views on this matter in the article's AfD log. Its all there for you to read, but I will say that even though I do respect you in this, I strongly disagree with you as well. :) Stephen Day (talk) 21:40, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Javier_(TV_Series) and List of Javier (TV series) episodes.
Hoax? I can't find anything on Google.Calaka (talk) 13:09, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- *Thumbs up.*Calaka (talk) 13:11, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
DYK for William of Pagula
On September 7, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article William of Pagula, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
≈ Chamal ¤ 17:22, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Oculus Sacerdotis
On September 7, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Oculus Sacerdotis, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
≈ Chamal ¤ 17:23, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Nominations open for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!
Many thanks, Roger Davies 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Removed speedy deletion tag: Jon Willis
Hi Ironholds! Firstly, thanks for helping out in CSD areas. I just wanted to inform you that I removed the speedy deletion tag you placed on Jon Willis- because: Winning the British nationals twice would be a claim to notability. Also, this person has an article in the independent. Possible hoax.. I'm currently looking around for sources. But not a suitable A7. If you have any questions or other message, please contact me. Thanks Kingpin (talk) 15:22, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
- Definitely notable, IMO. See this BBC article. I'll give the article a clean-up. - Kingpin (talk) 15:27, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Gipsy entertainment music
Hi! I saw that you've redirected the page Gipsy entertainment music to Romani music. I think that "Gipsy entertainment music" should be deleted altogether as it has no base and its just useless. But I'm not familiar with the procedures. can you take care of that? Thanks! Kenshin (talk) 09:54, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Hugo Stiglitz
I think Hugo Stiglitz (character) does not fail these guidlines as the character is becoming an internet meme in his own right already. WelcomeAtlas (talk) 16:46, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- http://www.imdb.com/character/ch0114457/, http://www.aintitcool.com/node/38147, I get a kick out of this one in particular: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090908001410AA8WXPv. It appears to be covered by lots of websites and Hugo Stiglitz is, again, becoming an internet meme so it's hard to simply exclude blogs and forums. WelcomeAtlas (talk) 16:55, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- Leave it up for a day and I'll find some sources, if I can't, feel free to redirect. WelcomeAtlas (talk) 16:57, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
Hello, Ironholds. You have new messages at Wuhwuzdat's talk page.You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
WuhWuzDat 13:58, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Ikea Heights was featured in the LA Times.
Does this make it notable?----occono (talk) 18:40, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- Ikea Heights, you made it into a redirect to Channel 101----occono (talk) 23:26, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Removal of PROD from Rickard Lane's
Hello Ironholds, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Rickard Lane's has been removed. It was removed by Colonel Warden with the following edit summary '(Move chat to talk page &c.)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with Colonel Warden before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 20:53, 9 September 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)
Isaac Blackford
Terribly sorry! I actually just totally forgot about it.. I will work to improve it and relist it in the future for a new review. Thanks for your time! :) —Charles Edward 22:42, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
A7 notice
Hi there,
I would like some clarification on what the actual requirements of A7 are. They seem to be very vague. A lot of pages seem to apply to this rule. , , etc. How do they differ? Reading them, they do not seem to cite why they should be in wikipedia.
Theatre Delicatessen have put on the first showing of a couple of plays in London, along with the only revival of David Hare's Fanshen. In theatre, that's a big deal.
Some more information so I can improve the article would be most appreciated.
Thanks,
Paul. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Keteracel (talk • contribs) 16:13, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Moved Network Scale-up method from {{prod}} to WP:AFD
Deprodding of Network Scale-up method
I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
tag from Network Scale-up method, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}}
back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Bwrs (talk) 03:56, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Rumford Medal
The Rumford Prize FLC is in currently in its second reiitering. As a member of Wikiproject Awards I was wondering if you would please comment/vote on it. Votes are crititically needed as I really wanna squeeze this through before inactivity kills it. Thank you in advance for responding and have a nice day, ResMar 22:13, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Sticky bomb
Sticky_bomb#Design. Best blockquote ever. :) Protonk (talk) 22:52, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Open Studio (IDE)
hello IronHolds, about my article...I don't see why it wouldn't be a good article? Its a summer project that will continue on after that. It was started back in april. Please let me know what i need to add to make it better. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Moonwolf14 (talk • contribs) 00:41, 12 September 2009 (UTC) OK, thank you....You may delete it...Moonwolf14 (talk) 00:47, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Woops
Yes, this was a little WOOPS!!. Thanks for fixing me up! Cheers!--CobraGeek 02:41, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Attorney General
Hmm, seems like it could pass GA, it's certainly detailed enough, although you might get concerns over how comprehensive it is due to the lack of length. Skinny87 (talk) 08:43, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
RFA A new name 2008
Hi Ironholds, now that Pastor Theo has checked the earlier account you might want to revisit Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship/A new name 2008 as we now have verification as to the earlier account's block log. ϢereSpielChequers 14:37, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
FLRC delegate election
Hi Ironholds! I'm just dropping by to let you know of the FLRC delegate election that begins on Tuesday. You may run in the election by following the instructions on the page. If you don't wish to run, please come and vote sometime next week! The election starts Tuesday and ends Saturday. For more information, check out the opening section of the page. Cheers, iMatthew at 19:37, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Removal of PROD from African dream
Hello Ironholds, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to African dream has been removed. It was removed by Envegas with the following edit summary '(I have removed points of view, text appearing in the economy of Africa article and links to websites so that it does not look as a spam article.)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with Envegas before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 21:49, 12 September 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)
AFD
Before you AFD, see the talk page for You Lie! Reasons given. Thank you.Mayor of Gotham City (talk) 23:33, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
RE: Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Phoenix fire apparatus
Would you considering userfying the article which you put up for deletion? The will delete it from main space completely and move it to a subpage of the creators.
The editor is a new editor, (this is his very first edit) userfying will give the new user a chance to rework this article and maybe wikipedia will get a long term dedicated editor
Please let me know as soon as possible, because as soon as someone else comments on the AfD, they must agree also before I can userfy the article. Thanks for your time.Ikip (talk) 02:18, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- Moved from user: ikip
- I'm not an admin, so the whole "deleting" part is going to be a fail. Userfying is for articles which have a chance of being useable if worked upon - this isn't one of those articles. Ironholds (talk) 02:19, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- Actually if anyone moves an article to a user page, and then types {{db-rediruser}} the redirect will be deleted quickly. This article does not appear notable at all. That said, it is the users one and only edit, and so I was hoping to give them a chance. Thanks for your response though. Good luck. Ikip (talk) 02:24, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
RE: Floodwood Mountain Reservation would you consider userfying this article? Again, the editor is a new editor, whose first edits were Floodwood Mountain Reservation. I looked for sources, and there are none, so it should not be on wikipedia.
You could always watch this userfied page, and in a couple of months speedy delete it, or I can, if you wish. The worst that will happen is the new editor leaves, and the article languishes. But maybe in those two months, the editor will continue to edit wikipedia and become a strong and dedicated editor, and realize why the article should not be on wikipedia in the first place. Let me know what you think. I am watching your page. Ikip (talk) 02:51, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- Again, no. Have you read the tag? It's a copyright violation, something by definition not acceptable in any userspace. Ironholds (talk) 02:52, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oh shit. No. I did not. Thanks for bringing that to my attention. Good point. I agree. Nice catch. Ikip (talk) 03:00, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Nina Assimakopoulos
I don't agree with your speedy deletion post on the Nina Assimakopoulos page. Performing in Carnegie hall and releasing 3 CDs is a claim to notability, so I'm removing your edit. Thanks --arosebyanyother 02:25, 14 September 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by A RoseByAnyOther (talk • contribs)
P C Pandey
Hello there. I can't criticize your well-intentioned renaming of an article today. Now, it may appear that I'm rather free with the scythe and the salt, but please see this, and its "project page", and the deletion review, and the AfD, and the other AfD, and etc etc etc. -- Hoary (talk) 11:32, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
afd comments
Really, now? Really? You're going to criticize the validity of my comments? My guess, somehow, is that if I had voted to delete in those cases you wouldn't have cared. Just to be clear, my comments are perfectly valid and you contacting me to tell me otherwise is petty and inappropriate. Now, quick! Get back to your pathological obsession with deleting other peoples' work! The Misplaced Pages desperately needs you! (It really doesn't.) --AStanhope (talk) 12:20, 14 September 2009 (UTC)