| Revision as of 03:31, 19 September 2009 view sourceHordaland (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers15,186 edits →Arbcom: reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:41, 19 September 2009 view source Literaturegeek (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers29,070 edits →ArbcomNext edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| ==Arbcom== | ==Arbcom== | ||
| You are mentioned in an arbcom request for modification. Fortunately such requests should not be as prolonged or as indepth as the main arbcom as it is just a request for an ammendment. Unfortunately scuro's latest comment on wiki med collaboration project has made me feel that it is time to bring this to the attention of the arbcom.] Other issues can be mediated but this one I feel is one that needs arbcom intervention.--] | ] 03:14, 19 September 2009 (UTC) | You are mentioned in an arbcom request for modification. Fortunately such requests should not be as prolonged or as indepth as the main arbcom as it is just a request for an ammendment. Unfortunately scuro's latest comment on wiki med collaboration project has made me feel that it is time to bring this to the attention of the arbcom.] Other issues can be mediated but this one I feel is one that needs arbcom intervention.--] | ] 03:14, 19 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| : - ] (]) 03:22, 19 September 2009 (UTC) | : - ] (]) 03:22, 19 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| : Answered on your Talk. - ] (]) 03:31, 19 September 2009 (UTC) | : Answered on your Talk. - ] (]) 03:31, 19 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| Thanks, wow that was a big mistake, thanks for spotting, updated link here and updating notification diffs on arbcom. I have also replied to you on my talk page.--] | ] 03:41, 19 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:41, 19 September 2009
A very silly tag. And just for the record, it is fake:
 | An editor thinks something might be wrong with this page. That editor won't actually make any effort to fix it, but can rest assured that s/he has done her/his encyclopedic duty by sticking on a tag. Please allow this tag to languish indefinitely at the top of the page, since nobody knows exactly what the tagging editor was worked up about. |
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 6 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III. |
Brain GAR notice
Brain has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 03:01, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Arbcom
You are mentioned in an arbcom request for modification. Fortunately such requests should not be as prolonged or as indepth as the main arbcom as it is just a request for an ammendment. Unfortunately scuro's latest comment on wiki med collaboration project has made me feel that it is time to bring this to the attention of the arbcom.Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests#Request_to_amend_prior_case:_ADHD Other issues can be mediated but this one I feel is one that needs arbcom intervention.--Literaturegeek | T@1k? 03:14, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Correct link. - Hordaland (talk) 03:22, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Answered on your Talk. - Hordaland (talk) 03:31, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, wow that was a big mistake, thanks for spotting, updated link here and updating notification diffs on arbcom. I have also replied to you on my talk page.--Literaturegeek | T@1k? 03:41, 19 September 2009 (UTC)