Revision as of 12:53, 1 October 2009 editMatthead (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers21,271 edits →Your reproaches: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:13, 1 October 2009 edit undoSky Attacker (talk | contribs)7,828 editsm Reverted edits by Matthead (talk) to last version by SMCNext edit → | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
Haha, the day may well come! By the way, solid work with reverts; even the vandals want you as their friend rather than their foe. :P ] (]) 06:14, 1 October 2009 (UTC) | Haha, the day may well come! By the way, solid work with reverts; even the vandals want you as their friend rather than their foe. :P ] (]) 06:14, 1 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Your reproaches == | |||
I expect you to to back up your statement made at ]. -- ] ] 12:53, 1 October 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:13, 1 October 2009
- Don't worry. I have a coup planned for the very near future! ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:06, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
ARCHIVES
You have reached the user talk page of The Legendary Sky Attacker. Please leave comments at the bottom.--The Legendary Sky Attacker 09:25, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
West Germany
As it seem you have never edited West Germany before, would you please explain why you reverted there? Do you simply assumed the removal of the "former country infobox" was vandalism, or do you have an opinion on the issue which you can back up with sources? As I was born and still live in said country, I am curios why you claim it is a "former country". -- Matthead Discuß 20:34, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- It was a proper infobox you removed. User Sky Attacker was right restoring the information, you by the way, reverted again.--Jacurek (talk) 20:46, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Jacurek, stop your wikistalking. You are not supposed to answer questions posed to others, like you already did over at User_talk:Seb_az86556#West_Germany. -- Matthead Discuß 21:03, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Thought for you
Hi Sky. Are you aware of the "+" or "New section" tab at the top of (most) pages? This is quite useful for user talk pages for edits like this or , because the edit summary would then read "→User talk:-5-: new section" instead of (say) "→regarding someone regarding Kate bush's song "feel it" as an example of unrequited love". Not trying to teach grandma to suck eggs, but if you don't actually know about this (I don't see any uses of it in your last 500 edits) it's quite useful. matic 07:02, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Hey, may I have a request?
do you want to be my friend? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Satan2012forever (talk • contribs) 05:56, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Re: Friend Request
Haha, the day may well come! By the way, solid work with reverts; even the vandals want you as their friend rather than their foe. :P SMC (talk) 06:14, 1 October 2009 (UTC)