Revision as of 20:24, 8 October 2009 editJohnny Spasm (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,520 edits →Lasorda Kingman rant: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:21, 9 October 2009 edit undoVassyana (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,130 edits →Motion votes: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
I noticed something interesting about the Lasorda Kingman rant, and brought it up for discussion at ]. I think you might want in on this discussion.--] (]) 20:24, 8 October 2009 (UTC) | I noticed something interesting about the Lasorda Kingman rant, and brought it up for discussion at ]. I think you might want in on this discussion.--] (]) 20:24, 8 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Motion votes == | |||
I note that your support of Jennavecia's desysop references my voting rationale. Please note that while I have not changed my vote, I have altered my voting statement. Please review the changes I have made, in case it alters your opinion about the matter. Cheers! ] (]) 03:21, 9 October 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:21, 9 October 2009
Status: Unknown
- To those leaving messages: Try to keep them brief and to the point. Posts that are too lengthy may not get a timely response. Thank you. To those leaving RfA thankspam: Consider yourself welcomed. I appreciate the thought, but they tend to take up a lot of my page and archives, and I really don't need them for anything. Wizardman
This talk page is automatically archived by User:MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 14 days are automatically archived. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
UserpageHow come you don't have your userpage semi-protected, or even full protected for that matter? Until It Sleeps `` Great Southern GroupHi there - you left a message at the GA1 page for the above saying "The following references change sub-domains and the URLs need fixing". I'm afraid i don't know what this means - can you explain? Ta. hamiltonstone (talk) 23:28, 24 September 2009 (UTC) The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 28 September 2009
Removal of PROD from Preston MattinglyHello Wizardman, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Preston Mattingly has been removed. It was removed by Spanneraol with the following edit summary '(Undid revision 317092205 by Wizardman (talk)deprod)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with Spanneraol before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 20:04, 30 September 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages) 20:04, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Jim Neversink THANKSThank you so much for the upgrade on Jim Neversink. I am very pleased and inspired to do better still! Any comments let me know. --SkaraB 09:39, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Rian malanGreater thanks still for upgrading Malan. I will improve it further as you suggest. You made my day Wizardman! --SkaraB 09:43, 2 October 2009 (UTC) RFCHi Wizardman. I want to write a piece about the RFC process, and when I asked Carcharoth for an arb perspective he also recommended I speak to you. I want to look at the history and utility of the system, how it works and how people think it should work. Would you be interested in providing input to that end? Hiding T 10:17, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Jim Neversink photoHi, I have added a photo to the article on Jim Neversink. Would you correct the request for a photo on the discussion page? I don't think I should do it myself. Many thanks, --SkaraB 19:06, 3 October 2009 (UTC) Neversink photoCool thanks. --89.150.114.73 (talk) 22:57, 3 October 2009 (UTC) The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 5 October 2009
Ooops!Sorry about that ;-) Paul August ☎ 22:54, 7 October 2009 (UTC) Lasorda Kingman rantI noticed something interesting about the Lasorda Kingman rant, and brought it up for discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Baseball. I think you might want in on this discussion.--Johnny Spasm (talk) 20:24, 8 October 2009 (UTC) Motion votesI note that your support of Jennavecia's desysop references my voting rationale. Please note that while I have not changed my vote, I have altered my voting statement. Please review the changes I have made, in case it alters your opinion about the matter. Cheers! Vassyana (talk) 03:21, 9 October 2009 (UTC) |