| Revision as of 16:51, 11 October 2009 editBlargh29 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers14,441 edits other warnings previously noted at AIV← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:17, 11 October 2009 edit undo64.231.61.51 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| {{ #if: 31 hour common vandalism block. While some of the edits might be considered accurate the intemperate language shows an intent to disrupt, so therefore the basis of the edits is vandalism. | <p>'''Comments:''' 31 hour common vandalism block. While some of the edits might be considered accurate the intemperate language shows an intent to disrupt, so therefore the basis of the edits is vandalism.}} | {{ #if: 31 hour common vandalism block. While some of the edits might be considered accurate the intemperate language shows an intent to disrupt, so therefore the basis of the edits is vandalism. | <p>'''Comments:''' 31 hour common vandalism block. While some of the edits might be considered accurate the intemperate language shows an intent to disrupt, so therefore the basis of the edits is vandalism.}} | ||
| |}<!-- Template:Anonblock --> | |}<!-- Template:Anonblock --> | ||
| {{unblock|I was blocked on the ostensible basis that my use of "intemperate language" to describe lousy, POV-pushing Misplaced Pages content is is proof of "intent to disrupt."<BR/><BR/>The blocking admin put the following message in his edit summary of the block: "We don't like you very much and think you smell of rotting seaweed."}} | |||
Revision as of 17:17, 11 October 2009
October 2009
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to Rick Santorum, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to Homesteading, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Misplaced Pages, as you did to Rick Santorum, you will be blocked from editing.
Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: Article. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Additional text
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Zero History, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. MuZemike 08:01, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: User talk:Blargh29. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. You cannot call another editor an "incompetent hack"
Constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you.
WP:AIN
I went ahead and reported your behavior to Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Rude language and POV Pushing.--Blargh29 (talk) 08:11, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. LessHeard vanU (talk) 10:51, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 To edit, please log in.
Editing by anonymous users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled. Registered users, however, are still able to edit. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, you may email us using an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. In your email, please tell us your preferred username and an account will be created for you. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. Comments: 31 hour common vandalism block. While some of the edits might be considered accurate the intemperate language shows an intent to disrupt, so therefore the basis of the edits is vandalism. |
69.159.84.182 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was blocked on the ostensible basis that my use of "intemperate language" to describe lousy, POV-pushing Misplaced Pages content is is proof of "intent to disrupt."The blocking admin put the following message in his edit summary of the block: "We don't like you very much and think you smell of rotting seaweed."
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I was blocked on the ostensible basis that my use of "intemperate language" to describe lousy, POV-pushing Misplaced Pages content is is proof of "intent to disrupt."<BR/><BR/>The blocking admin put the following message in his edit summary of the block: "We don't like you very much and think you smell of rotting seaweed." |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I was blocked on the ostensible basis that my use of "intemperate language" to describe lousy, POV-pushing Misplaced Pages content is is proof of "intent to disrupt."<BR/><BR/>The blocking admin put the following message in his edit summary of the block: "We don't like you very much and think you smell of rotting seaweed." |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I was blocked on the ostensible basis that my use of "intemperate language" to describe lousy, POV-pushing Misplaced Pages content is is proof of "intent to disrupt."<BR/><BR/>The blocking admin put the following message in his edit summary of the block: "We don't like you very much and think you smell of rotting seaweed." |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}