| Revision as of 09:12, 19 December 2005 editCamridge (talk | contribs)642 edits Comaze, you have been ignored, and you will be reported← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:23, 19 December 2005 edit undoAction potential (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers9,090 edits Personal attack and article ownershipNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| Thanks for the pointer Terryeo. I think there is probably a better way of writing it in. I will have another look. Regards ] 02:06, 14 December 2005 (UTC) | Thanks for the pointer Terryeo. I think there is probably a better way of writing it in. I will have another look. Regards ] 02:06, 14 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
| == Personal attack and article ownership == | |||
| In a you wrotem "Comaze's EXTREME ANTAGONISM surfaces again with his butchery of images (zealous fanatical censorship), Solution: Revert his nonsense, and report his deliberately tedious actions". You obviously have something against me, so why not air you concern at arbitration. There is no need for attack me on public discussion, this is another violation of "no personal attacks". Your edits and comments expose a bias between you and your friends who keep reverting any change to the article that does make NLP seem like Scientology. The engram, the reptile brain image from scientology, the image that says "The New Scientology of Acheivement", dodgy links of Fritz Perls to Scientology, rewriting the history NLP to make give scientology a preference. I don't expect you to answer me, but I have alot of evidence against you and the more you make these biased and false edits the more evidence I will have. Your edit also shows that you have an agenda to "own" the article. I've been reading up on wikipedia case law and unless you change pretty quickly I will be presenting evidence about this as well. --] 09:23, 19 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:23, 19 December 2005
Template:User:Encyclopedist/Welcome! εγκυκλοπαίδεια* (talk) 03:07, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
Personal attack
I consider this remark to be a personal attck, "Comaze, your denial borders on delusion". see diffs. --Comaze 10:54, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
Regarding the ENGRAM article
You have modified the article and introduced the word "pseudoscientific" at the entry point where Dianetic's use of the word Engram is posted. May I graciously point out that an idea must first be introduced before its controvery is spelled out because unless that form is followed the whole article is opinion. Opinion is all right, controversy is all right but until an idea is spelled out or defined, a person can not understand the various sides of controversy. So, in keeping with the spirit of wikipedia I point this out, have a good one :) Terryeo 20:09, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for the pointer Terryeo. I think there is probably a better way of writing it in. I will have another look. Regards Camridge 02:06, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
Personal attack and article ownership
In a recent post you wrotem "Comaze's EXTREME ANTAGONISM surfaces again with his butchery of images (zealous fanatical censorship), Solution: Revert his nonsense, and report his deliberately tedious actions". You obviously have something against me, so why not air you concern at arbitration. There is no need for attack me on public discussion, this is another violation of "no personal attacks". Your edits and comments expose a bias between you and your friends who keep reverting any change to the article that does make NLP seem like Scientology. The engram, the reptile brain image from scientology, the image that says "The New Scientology of Acheivement", dodgy links of Fritz Perls to Scientology, rewriting the history NLP to make give scientology a preference. I don't expect you to answer me, but I have alot of evidence against you and the more you make these biased and false edits the more evidence I will have. Your edit also shows that you have an agenda to "own" the article. I've been reading up on wikipedia case law and unless you change pretty quickly I will be presenting evidence about this as well. --Comaze 09:23, 19 December 2005 (UTC)