Revision as of 13:14, 26 October 2009 editKurtilein (talk | contribs)100 edits →Your unsourced addition to the article Keeping Scientology Working← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:42, 26 October 2009 edit undoCirt (talk | contribs)199,086 edits →Arbitration Enforcement report: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
then add sources instead of just removing this information from the article. if you keep removing it, then i will need to get the help of others to make sure that this information will be included into the article and stays there. but i dont think you will manage to keep this information out of the article for long. ] (]) 13:14, 26 October 2009 (UTC) | then add sources instead of just removing this information from the article. if you keep removing it, then i will need to get the help of others to make sure that this information will be included into the article and stays there. but i dont think you will manage to keep this information out of the article for long. ] (]) 13:14, 26 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Arbitration Enforcement report == | |||
Please see ]. ''']''' (]) 13:42, 26 October 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:42, 26 October 2009
feel free to comment, or to discuss with me. here is the place for doing this.
Welcome
Welcome!
Hello, Kurtilein, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Cirt (talk) 04:59, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Your unsourced addition to the article Keeping Scientology Working
Do you have independent reliable secondary sources for this info? Otherwise, for an individual Wikipedian to pick and choose from a primary source, what to include or not to include, borders on WP:NOR violation. Cirt (talk) 12:26, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
- "Another passage that has been cited by critics of the organisation, especially in relation to cases of death where critics see connections to the organisation" = this part was completely unsourced. Cirt (talk) 12:48, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
then add sources instead of just removing this information from the article. if you keep removing it, then i will need to get the help of others to make sure that this information will be included into the article and stays there. but i dont think you will manage to keep this information out of the article for long. Kurtilein (talk) 13:14, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
Arbitration Enforcement report
Please see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Kurtilein. Cirt (talk) 13:42, 26 October 2009 (UTC)