Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
please also see Misplaced Pages's policies on ] as well. that's a nice-looking site you've put together, but adding a link to it to multiple articles that it isn't directly related to isn't in line with Misplaced Pages policies. ] (]) 23:52, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
please also see Misplaced Pages's policies on ]. that's a nice-looking site you've put together, but adding a link to it to multiple articles that it isn't directly related to isn't in line with Misplaced Pages policies. ] (]) 23:52, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
'''update:''' re-adding the same link that other editors have removed is not a good way to proceed. if you feel there are compelling reasons why a link to your site should be added to a given article, you should state those reasons on the ] of the articles and let other editors reach a ] about including it or not. thanks ] (]) 10:52, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.
please also see Misplaced Pages's policies on external links. that's a nice-looking site you've put together, but adding a link to it to multiple articles that it isn't directly related to isn't in line with Misplaced Pages policies. Sssoul (talk) 23:52, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
update: re-adding the same link that other editors have removed is not a good way to proceed. if you feel there are compelling reasons why a link to your site should be added to a given article, you should state those reasons on the talk pages of the articles and let other editors reach a consensus about including it or not. thanks Sssoul (talk) 10:52, 31 October 2009 (UTC)