| Revision as of 20:25, 18 November 2009 editNug (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers22,427 editsm →Digwuren CU results← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:39, 18 November 2009 edit undoBrandon (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators22,369 edits replyNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| :::Yes I have. My findings are almost entirely unrelated to the evidence provided (which was largely stale and not actionable) nor are they very interesting. ] (]) 19:57, 18 November 2009 (UTC) | :::Yes I have. My findings are almost entirely unrelated to the evidence provided (which was largely stale and not actionable) nor are they very interesting. ] (]) 19:57, 18 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ::::Okay. I see that ] is listed as a suspected sock puppet. He was accused of this before by Offliner and he said he was willing to , so you may want to pass that on to ArbCom too. --] (]) 20:23, 18 November 2009 (UTC) | ::::Okay. I see that ] is listed as a suspected sock puppet. He was accused of this before by Offliner and he said he was willing to , so you may want to pass that on to ArbCom too. --] (]) 20:23, 18 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :::::I did not find that user to be related to Digwuren. ] (]) 20:39, 18 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:39, 18 November 2009
 | Brandon is taking a short nap and will be back on Misplaced Pages next month. |
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Digwuren CU results
Can you give us at least some information about Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Digwuren results? Why did you not make the results public but sent them to ArbCom? Offliner (talk) 10:20, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- The results may affect the outcome of an active ArbCom case and the committee has more information on the user than I do. Myself or another CU will post the results in a few days. Brandon (talk) 11:05, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- Hi Brandon, did you see the latest comments on the SPI page. --Martin (talk) 18:29, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yes I have. My findings are almost entirely unrelated to the evidence provided (which was largely stale and not actionable) nor are they very interesting. Brandon (talk) 19:57, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- Okay. I see that User:Põhja Konn is listed as a suspected sock puppet. He was accused of this before by Offliner and he said he was willing to verify his real identity to an ArbCom member, so you may want to pass that on to ArbCom too. --Martin (talk) 20:23, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- I did not find that user to be related to Digwuren. Brandon (talk) 20:39, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- Okay. I see that User:Põhja Konn is listed as a suspected sock puppet. He was accused of this before by Offliner and he said he was willing to verify his real identity to an ArbCom member, so you may want to pass that on to ArbCom too. --Martin (talk) 20:23, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yes I have. My findings are almost entirely unrelated to the evidence provided (which was largely stale and not actionable) nor are they very interesting. Brandon (talk) 19:57, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- Hi Brandon, did you see the latest comments on the SPI page. --Martin (talk) 18:29, 18 November 2009 (UTC)