| Revision as of 02:10, 10 December 2009 editFifelfoo (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers13,796 edits →Mass killings under Communist regimes: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:44, 10 December 2009 edit undoFifelfoo (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers13,796 edits →Mass killings under Communist regimesNext edit → | ||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
| I find it ironic that after the article has had an Expert request banner, that when expert involvement was made available, that the articles' coat-tail of non-humanities area anti-communists BIT the hell out of me. The difference between editors who just happen to have political opinions of a certain sought, and people who have political opinions of a certain sought and edit on that basis is remarkable, and clear. I am also increasingly frustrated with the lack of ANI responses. (Dealing with fresh editors with stale opinions is a chore, but, at least they aren't tendentious and dishonest). ] (]) 02:10, 10 December 2009 (UTC) | I find it ironic that after the article has had an Expert request banner, that when expert involvement was made available, that the articles' coat-tail of non-humanities area anti-communists BIT the hell out of me. The difference between editors who just happen to have political opinions of a certain sought, and people who have political opinions of a certain sought and edit on that basis is remarkable, and clear. I am also increasingly frustrated with the lack of ANI responses. (Dealing with fresh editors with stale opinions is a chore, but, at least they aren't tendentious and dishonest). ] (]) 02:10, 10 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :To be quite honest, that's a gutful. The differential in administrator willingness to let wild, grossly incivil, anti-encyclopedic editing run wild even when they have discretionary editing to hand; the habit of non-humanities twonks with a personal vendetta about their precious special "I experienced this" BITING humanities specialists; and, the inane repetition of cookie-cutter anti-communists with no more than a high school grade humanities education; all this has irritated me sufficiently to the point where I am not going to attend unless WP:ANI actually grows cahones, or a particular editor continues baldly in the past conduct and makes me to to Arbitration's sanction request page. I'm going back to editing minutae of comma in Featured Article citations. ] (]) 06:44, 10 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:44, 10 December 2009
 Archives | |
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Thank you
I appreciate that.radek (talk) 06:59, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Just want you know
Hi! It seems an attack on you has been prepared . I have announced this discovery here: . I also suspect Amauter Editor to be a sockpuppet of Digwuren.--Dojarca (talk) 22:25, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
- Just want you to know I have removed the G10 tag as it is not appropriate. While it would be better to prepare his case against you off line, this is not an attack page and would only turn up in whatever proceedings you two are headed for anyway. May I suggest that you work constructively to resolve your differences/ Perhaps cool off and stay away form this other person? Dlohcierekim 22:42, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
AmateurEditor
I am now pretty sure that AmateurEditor is in fact Ultramarine, a user who edited Misplaced Pages since early 2005 and abandoned Misplaced Pages just 4 days before AmateurEditor appeared first. Ultramarine was also havily involved in The Black Book of Communism disputes and related topics.--Dojarca (talk) 02:38, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
- Is this comedy hour? Ultramarine quit the project in 2008, i.e. 1 year and 4 days, not 4 days before AmateurEditor joined. lol --Martin (talk) 03:06, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello?
Sorry, I don't know anything about that cat, do I ? Off2riorob (talk) 22:42, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
I wasn't wrong about anything I nominated it for deletion as is my right and the template was removed and the cat was populated, so actually I was not wrong as you put it in your edit summary, you shouldn't do that with the name of another editor in the edit summary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Off2riorob (talk • contribs) 22:48, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
- Perhaps I was mistaken to tag it with the reason I gave, I am quite new to the correct reason to tag things, I am more in learning mode with that..but please don't do that with my name in your edit summary. Off2riorob (talk) 23:37, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
Jewish Bolshevism
You just attempted to delete the Russia section. I notify you that the discussion is in progress in the article talk page, and the consensus has not been achieved yet about the relevance of this section. Deletion of the content without a consensus is a violation of WP policy.--Paul Siebert (talk) 18:17, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Left-wing nationalism
On what page of The Decolonization of Quebec do the Milners claim to have actually coined the expression? -- Mathieugp (talk) 14:21, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Talk page archiving
Hi, I noticed that MiszaBot was not correctly archiving old discussions from your talk page due to a spacing/line issue. I think that i have corrected the issue, but I'm afraid your old talk page contents for the past few months have not been archived. If you want to, you can still manually set up an archive from the page history. –BLACK FALCON 00:05, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Mass killings under Communist regimes
I find it ironic that after the article has had an Expert request banner, that when expert involvement was made available, that the articles' coat-tail of non-humanities area anti-communists BIT the hell out of me. The difference between editors who just happen to have political opinions of a certain sought, and people who have political opinions of a certain sought and edit on that basis is remarkable, and clear. I am also increasingly frustrated with the lack of ANI responses. (Dealing with fresh editors with stale opinions is a chore, but, at least they aren't tendentious and dishonest). Fifelfoo (talk) 02:10, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
- To be quite honest, that's a gutful. The differential in administrator willingness to let wild, grossly incivil, anti-encyclopedic editing run wild even when they have discretionary editing to hand; the habit of non-humanities twonks with a personal vendetta about their precious special "I experienced this" BITING humanities specialists; and, the inane repetition of cookie-cutter anti-communists with no more than a high school grade humanities education; all this has irritated me sufficiently to the point where I am not going to attend unless WP:ANI actually grows cahones, or a particular editor continues baldly in the past conduct and makes me to to Arbitration's sanction request page. I'm going back to editing minutae of comma in Featured Article citations. Fifelfoo (talk) 06:44, 10 December 2009 (UTC)