Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 04:07, 12 December 2009

Nice job on expanding the Baltic cinemas BTW The Bald One 15:15, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

-Thanks!--Termer (talk) 15:24, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Yes, very good work indeed on Estonian cinema. Valuable too, from somebody who is clearly an expert in the film industry which on english wikipedia is the sort of specialist contribution we need. List of Estonian films has come on leaps and bounds since I last looked. I would suggest that you wiki link the directors and fill in the actors, perhaps those which are likely to have their own articles. I can help get some of the films and biographies stubbed when I have a moment. I created a goliath of red links!! atlist of Estonian actors which includes theatre actors too a while ago from estonian wiki but I have a strong feeling that many of them ar enot notable to make the list. ANyway Keep up the good work! The Bald One 19:10, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Lia Looveer

Pages that disparage or threaten their subject or some other entity, and serve no other purpose. One section discussing whether she collaborated or not and other discussions on the same page means that the page does serve another purpose. When he provided a link and asked for discussion (hardly a random suggestion) on the talk page first, that seems like the proper way to include controversial content rather than just adding it? It may disparage the subject, but it does not mean it shouldn't be included if it's true. In this case the link appears weak and I doubt it will be included in the article, which is why I suggested that the section could be blanked once consensus has been reached. James086 05:38, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

I am not deleting the talk page. If consensus on whether she was a Nazi collaborator or not has been reached then the section can be blanked. You seem to want to control what others can ask. Fair enough, if someone asked if Barack Obama is a Nazi collaborator, it would be ridiculous (he wasn't even born in WWII) and can be removed, but it is a reasonable question about someone who worked for a German radio station in WWII. I am not going to look at the info and I'm not going to form an opinion one way or the other. James086 07:28, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

A {{db-g10}} tag requests deletion of the page. You should wait until the discussion is finished before blanking the section. This diff shows that you blanked the section 2 hours after Anti-Nationalist offered an opinion. The discussion certainly was not finished. You should also tell people that you are blanking it and why rather than just doing it. It is not at all surprising that the blanking was reverted. Let the discussion play out, tell people why you are blanking and then if there's no objection do so. Just because you don't like the topic of conversation does not mean the conversation is not allowed. James086 07:43, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Test your World War I knowledge with the Henry Allingham International Contest!

As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:38, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009)

The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:38, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Anti-Nationalist

You may be interested in Anti-Nationalist's new attack - Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Sander_Säde. He seems to attack absolutely anyone who disagrees with him. --Sander Säde 11:27, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Not helpful

In the last few days you've created three different complaints about the same user (here, here and here). This is starting to approach vexatious litigation and is obvious battleground activity, and further erodes any remnants of good faith that may still exist. I suggest you redirect your attention elsewhere and have as little further contact with User:Anti-Nationalist as possible for a while. This is not (yet) a binding remedy per WP:DIGWUREN, and I sincerely hope one won't be necessary and that this note is sufficient. Thank you, henrik•talk 12:56, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Disruptive Conduct at Mass killings under Communism

You may wish to note Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive Conduct at Mass killings under Communist regimes which requests Arbitration related sanctions in the form of warning and counselling in relation to your disruptive behaviour at Talk:Mass killings under Communist regimes. Fifelfoo (talk) 22:07, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Please see: Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Termer