| Revision as of 06:14, 10 December 2009 editViriditas (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers169,197 editsm Reverted edits by Kefir Wills (talk) to last version by Brian A Schmidt← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:04, 13 December 2009 edit undoAlexh19740110 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,638 edits WP:BOLD, resolves all problems, please full protect this WP:WRONG version, until the discussion at talk self-terminates; I will then help to rewrite a proper refutationNext edit → | ||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| '''Richard Siegmund Lindzen''' (born February 8, 1940, ]) is an American ] and ] Professor of ] at the ]. Lindzen is known for his work in the dynamics of the middle atmosphere, ] and ] ]. He has published more than 200 books and scientific papers.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www-eaps.mit.edu/faculty/lindzen/CV.pdf |title=Curriculum Vitae of Richard Siegmund Lindzen |accessdate=16 June 2009}}</ref> He was one |
'''Richard Siegmund Lindzen''' (born February 8, 1940, ]) is an American ] and ] Professor of ] at the ]. Lindzen is known for his work in the dynamics of the middle atmosphere, ] and ] ]. He has published more than 200 books and scientific papers.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www-eaps.mit.edu/faculty/lindzen/CV.pdf |title=Curriculum Vitae of Richard Siegmund Lindzen |accessdate=16 June 2009}}</ref> He was one a lead author of Chapter 7, 'Physical Climate Processes and Feedbacks,' of the ] ] on ]. Describing himself as a global warming "denier" rather than a skeptic,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://audio.wrko.com/m/audio/24111309/richard-lindzen-global-warming-denier.htm |title=Richard Lindzen:Global Warming Denier | WRKO |publisher=audio.wrko.com |accessdate=2009-12-07 }}</ref> he has been a critic of some ] theories and what he states are political pressures on climate scientists. | ||
| He hypothesized that the Earth may act like an ]; increased sea surface temperature in the tropics would result in reduced ]s and thus more ] leakage from Earth's atmosphere.<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://eaps.mit.edu/faculty/lindzen/adinfriris.pdf |author=Lindzen, R.S., M.-D. Chou, and A.Y. Hou |date=2001 |title=Does the Earth have an adaptive infrared iris? |journal=Bull. Amer. Met. Soc. |volume=82 |pages=417–432 |doi=10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082<0417:DTEHAA>2.3.CO;2 }}</ref> This hypothesis, generally rejected, suggests a negative feedback which would counter the effects of {{CO2}} warming by lowering the ]. | He hypothesized that the Earth may act like an ]; increased sea surface temperature in the tropics would result in reduced ]s and thus more ] leakage from Earth's atmosphere.<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://eaps.mit.edu/faculty/lindzen/adinfriris.pdf |author=Lindzen, R.S., M.-D. Chou, and A.Y. Hou |date=2001 |title=Does the Earth have an adaptive infrared iris? |journal=Bull. Amer. Met. Soc. |volume=82 |pages=417–432 |doi=10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082<0417:DTEHAA>2.3.CO;2 }}</ref> This hypothesis, generally rejected, suggests a negative feedback which would counter the effects of {{CO2}} warming by lowering the ]. | ||
| ==Career== | ==Career== | ||
| Lindzen has published papers on ], ] meteorology, ]s, ] instability, ], global ], the ], ]s, seasonal atmospheric effects.<ref>{{cite web | title=Publications | url=http://www-eaps.mit.edu/faculty/lindzen/PublicationsRSL.html | accessdate=2007-04-05 |
Lindzen has published papers on ], ] meteorology, ]s, ] instability, ], global ], the ], ]s, seasonal atmospheric effects.<ref>{{cite web | title=Publications | url=http://www-eaps.mit.edu/faculty/lindzen/PublicationsRSL.html | accessdate=2007-04-05}}</ref>. He is a member of the ] and the Science, Health, and Economic Advisory Council at the Annapolis Center for Science-Based Public Policy. Educated at ] (Ph.D., '64, S.M., '61, A.B., '60), he moved to MIT in 1983, prior to which he held positions at the ] (1964–1965), Institute for Theoretical Meteorology, ] (1965–1966), ] (NCAR) (1966–1967), ] (1968–1972) and ] (1972–1983). He also briefly held a position of Visiting Lecturer at ] in 1967.<ref>{{ cite web | title=Curriculum Vitae, Richard Siegmund Lindzen | url=http://eaps.mit.edu/faculty/lindzen/CV.pdf | date=June 1, 2008 | accessdate=2009-03-18 }}</ref> | ||
| ==Awards and honors == | ==Awards and honors == | ||
| Lindzen is a recipient of the ]'s Meisinger and Charney Awards, ]'s Macelwane Medal, and the Leo Prize from the Wallin Foundation in Goteborg, Sweden. He is a member of the ] (NAS), and the Norwegian Academy of Sciences and Letters, and was named Fellow of the ], the ], the American Geophysical Union, and the American Meteorological Society. He is a corresponding member of the NAS Committee on Human Rights, and a member of the ] Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate. He was a consultant to the Global Modeling and Simulation Group at NASA's ], and a Distinguished Visiting Scientist at California Institute of Technology's ]. | Lindzen is a recipient of the ]'s Meisinger and Charney Awards, ]'s Macelwane Medal, and the Leo Prize from the Wallin Foundation in Goteborg, Sweden. He is a member of the ] (NAS), and the Norwegian Academy of Sciences and Letters, and was named Fellow of the ], the ], the American Geophysical Union, and the American Meteorological Society. He is a corresponding member of the NAS Committee on Human Rights, and a member of the ] Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate. He was a consultant to the Global Modeling and Simulation Group at NASA's ], and a Distinguished Visiting Scientist at California Institute of Technology's ]. | ||
| ⚫ | |||
| ===Climate change science=== | |||
| In 2001 Lindzen served on an 11-member panel organized by the ].<ref>{{cite web | title=Climate Change Science: An Analysis of Some Key Questions: Committee on the Science of Climate Change | url=http://www.nap.edu/html/climatechange/committee.html | publisher=] | year=2001 | accessdate=2007-04-05}}</ref> The panel's report, entitled ''Climate Change Science: An Analysis of Some Key Questions'',<ref>{{cite web | title=Climate Change Science: An Analysis of Some Key Questions | url=http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10139.html?onpi_webextra6 | publisher=] | year=2001 | accessdate=2007-04-05}}</ref> has been widely cited. Lindzen subsequently publicly criticized the report summary for leaving out doubts about the weight that could be placed on 20 years of temperature records.<ref name="Lindzen">{{cite web | title=Scientists' Report Doesn't Support the Kyoto Treaty | url=http://eaps.mit.edu/faculty/lindzen/OpEds/LindzenWSJ.pdf |format=PDF| last=Lindzen | first=Richard S. | publisher=] | date=June 11, 2001 | accessdate=2007-04-05}}</ref> ] has said that Lindzen agrees with about 90% of what other climate scientists are saying, yet the last 10% is sufficiently different to label him a contrarian.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/the_contrarian/ |title=An MIT climatologist's quixotic struggle against global warming science: The Contrarian |date=August 24, 2006 |publisher=] }}</ref> | |||
| ===IPCC activities=== | |||
| Lindzen worked on Chapter 7 of 2001 ] Working Group 1, which considers the physical processes that are active in real world climate. He had previously been a contributor to Chapter 4 of the 1995 "] ]." He described the full 2001 IPCC report as "an admirable description of research activities in climate science"<ref name="canadian_reactions_to_sir_david_king.html"/> although he criticized the ]. Lindzen stated in May 2001 that it did not truly summarize the IPCC report<ref>{{cite web | title=Testimony of Richard S. Lindzen before the U.S. Senate Commerce Committee | url=http://www.lavoisier.com.au/articles/climate-policy/science-and-policy/Lindzen_McCain.pdf |format=PDF| last=Lindzen | first=Richard S. | publisher=] | date=May 1, 2001 | accessdate=18th March, 2009}}</ref> but had been amended to state more definite conclusions.<ref>{{cite web | title=The Deniers – Part V: The original denier: into the cold | url=http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/story.html?id=63ab844f-8c55-4059-9ad8-89de085af353&k=0 | last=Solomon | first=Lawrence | authorlink= Lawrence Solomon | publisher=] | date=December 22, 2006 | accessdate=2007-04-05}}</ref> He also emphasized the fact that the summary had not been written by scientists alone. However, the NAS panel on which Lindzen served (see above) disagreed, saying that the summary was the result of dialogue between scientists and policymakers.<ref>The NAS panel said on the matter that "The committee finds that the full IPCC Working Group I (WGI) report is an admirable summary of research activities in climate science, and the full report is adequately summarized in the Technical Summary. The full WGI report and its Technical Summary are not specifically directed at policy. The Summary for Policymakers reflects less emphasis on communicating the basis for uncertainty and a stronger emphasis on areas of major concern associated with human-induced climate change. This change in emphasis appears to be the result of a summary process in which scientists work with policy makers on the document. Written responses from U.S. coordinating and lead scientific authors to the committee indicate, however, that (a) no changes were made without the consent of the convening lead authors (this group represents a fraction of the lead and contributing authors) and (b) most changes that did occur lacked significant impact."</ref><ref name=ccs_summary>{{cite web | title=Climate Change Science: An Analysis of Some Key Questions: Summary | url=http://www.nap.edu/html/climatechange/summary.html | publisher=] | year=2001 | accessdate=2007-04-05}}</ref> | |||
| ===Media appearances=== | |||
| Lindzen has contributed to several articles on climate change in the mainstream media. In 1996, Lindzen was interviewed by William Stevens for an article in the '']''.<ref name=stevenswnyt>{{cite web | |||
| |date=June 18, 1996 | |||
| |title=SCIENTIST AT WORK: Richard S. Lindzen;A Skeptic Asks, Is It Getting Hotter, Or Is It Just the Computer Model? | |||
| |publisher=The New York Times | |||
| |author=Stevens, W. | |||
| |url=http://www.nytimes.com/1996/06/18/science/scientist-work-richard-s-lindzen-skeptic-asks-it-getting-hotter-it-just-computer.html?pagewanted=1 | |||
| |accessdate=2009-07-26}}</ref> In this article, Lindzen expressed his concern over the validity of ] used to predict future climate change. Lindzen said that computer models may have overpredicted future warming because of inadequate handling of the climate system's ]. The feedback due to water vapor is a major factor in determining how much warming would be expected to occur with increased atmospheric concentrations of ]. Lindzen said that the water vapor feedback could act to nullify future warming. According to Stevens, scientists who worked on computer climate models did not accept Lindzen's nullification hypothesis. | |||
| The ''New York Times'' article included the comments of several other experts. ], director of the ] at ], did not accept Lindzen's assessment of the science, and said that Lindzen had "sacrificed his luminosity by taking a stand that most of us feel is scientifically unsound." Mahlman did, however, admit that Lindzen was a "formidable opponent." ] of ] basically agreed with Lindzen, describing him as "courageous." He said, "A lot of my older colleagues are very skeptical on the global warming thing." He added that whilst he regarded some of Lindzen's views as flawed, he said that, "across the board he's generally very good." ] of the ] agreed with Lindzen that progress in climate change science had been exaggerated, but said "relatively few scientists who are as skeptical of the whole thing as Dick is." ] of ] criticized Lindzen's estimate of ] (the global mean temperature increase associated with a doubling in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations), arguing that it was too specific given the available evidence. Lindzen's reply to this was that he had at least given reasons for his estimate, rather than following the "herd instinct" common in science. | |||
| In June 2001, Lindzen wrote an article for the '']'', stating that "there is no consensus, unanimous or otherwise, about long-term climate trends and what causes them" and "I cannot stress this enough – we are not in a position to confidently attribute past climate change to carbon dioxide or to forecast what the climate will be in the future. That is to say, contrary to media impressions, agreement with the three basic statements tells us almost nothing relevant to policy discussions."<ref name="Lindzen"/> In July, Lindzen was interviewed by Fred Guterl for '']''.<ref name=guterlfnewsweek>{{cite web | |||
| |date=July 23, 2001 | |||
| |title=The Truth About Global Warming | |||
| |publisher=Newsweek | |||
| |author=Guterl, F. | |||
| |url=http://www.newsweek.com/id/78772/page/1 | |||
| |accessdate=2009-07-26}}</ref> Other experts also contributed to the article. Contrary to the ], Lindzen said that climate models were inadequate and had not improved. Guterl wrote that despite the accepted errors in their models, e.g., treatment of ]s, modelers still thought their climate predictions were valid. Lindzen gave an estimate of the Earth's climate sensitivity of less than 1 degree Celsius. Lindzen based this estimate on how the climate had responded to ]. ], a climate scientist at the ] estimated a climate sensitivity of 3–4 degrees Celsius. Hansen based this estimate on evidence from ]s. According to Hansen: "Dick's idea that climate sensitivity is low is simply wrong, The history of the earth proves him wrong."<ref name=guterlfnewsweek /> ], director of the ], took the view that ] emissions should be cut. When asked about Lindzen, Schellnhuber said "People like him are very useful in finding the weak links in our thinking."<ref name=guterlfnewsweek /> | |||
| In September 2003 Lindzen wrote an open letter to the mayor of his home town, ],<ref></ref> his views on global warming and the ], in which he stated, "... he impact of CO<sub>2</sub> on the Earth's heat budget is nonlinear. What this means is that although CO<sub>2</sub> has only increased about 30% over its pre-industrial level, the impact on the heat budget of the Earth due to the increases in CO<sub>2</sub> and other man influenced greenhouse substances has already reached about 75% of what one expects from a doubling of CO<sub>2</sub>, and that the temperature rise seen so far is much less (by a factor of 2–3) than models predict (assuming that all of the very irregular change in temperature over the past 120 years or so—about 1 degree F—is due to added greenhouse gases—a very implausible assumption)." | |||
| The ] ] online version of '']'' magazine reported that Lindzen is "willing to take bets that global average temperatures in 20 years will in fact be lower than they are now."<ref name=reasonmag>{{cite web | title=Two Sides to Global Warming | url= http://www.reason.com/rb/rb111004.shtml | last=Bailey | first=Ronald |authorlink=Ronald Bailey | publisher=] | date=November 10, 2005 | accessdate=2007-04-05}}</ref> ], a scientist involved in climate prediction, contacted Lindzen to arrange a bet. Annan and Lindzen exchanged proposals for bets, but were unable to agree. Lindzen's final proposal was a bet that if the temperature change were less than 0.2 °C (0.36 °F), he would win. If the temperature change were between 0.2 °C and 0.4 °C the bet would be off, and if the temperature change were 0.4 °C or greater, Annan would win. He would take 2 to 1 odds.<ref name="autogenerated1">{{cite web | title=Betting on Climate Change | url=http://www.reason.com/rb/rb060805.shtml | last=Bailey | first=Ronald |authorlink=Ronald Bailey | publisher=] | date=June 8, 2005 | accessdate=2007-04-05}}</ref> | |||
| Of the Kyoto Accord, he claims there is no "controversy over the fact that the Kyoto Protocol, itself, will do almost nothing to stabilize CO<sub>2</sub>. Capping CO<sub>2</sub> emissions per unit of electricity generated will have a negligible impact on CO<sub>2</sub> levels."<ref> | |||
| {{cite news | |||
| | last = Lindzen | |||
| | first = Dr. Richard | |||
| | title = A Mayor Mistake | |||
| | publisher = TCS (Tech Central Station) | |||
| | date = 09/17/2003 | |||
| | url = http://www.tcsdaily.com/Article.aspx?id=091703C | |||
| | accessdate = 2009-03-15}} | |||
| </ref> | |||
| He frequently speaks out against the IPCC position that significant global warming is very likely caused by humans (see ]) although he accepts that the warming has occurred, saying ''global mean temperature is about 0.6 degrees Celsius higher than it was a century ago''.<ref name="canadian_reactions_to_sir_david_king.html">{{cite web | title=Canadian Reactions To Sir David King | url=http://meteo.lcd.lu/globalwarming/Lindzen/canadian_reactions_to_sir_david_king.html | last=Lindzen | first=Richard S. | publisher=] | date=February 23, 2004 | accessdate=2007-04-05}}</ref> A '']'' article on the ] included a discussion of Lindzen's critical views on the IPCC.<ref name=buseuspiegel>{{cite web | |||
| |date=05/03/2007 | |||
| |title=Is the IPCC Doing Harm to Science? | |||
| |publisher=Spiegel Online International | |||
| |author=Buse, U. Translated from the German by C. Sultan | |||
| |url=http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,480766,00.html | |||
| |accessdate=2009-07-26}}</ref> The writer of article Uwe Buse concluded "Lindzen's arguments sound convincing, but they are still nothing but claims, popular theories as opposed to a transparent global process , a global ] among climate researchers." | |||
| Lindzen was one of several scientists who appeared in '']'', a documentary that aired in the UK in March, 2007 on ]. In a critical review of the documentary, ] stated <ref name="urlDont be swindled – ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)">{{cite web |url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/07/12/1976998.htm |title=Don't be swindled – ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation) |format= |work= |accessdate=}}</ref> "Amongst the selected contrarian 'experts' Durkin has rallied to his cause, there are Tim Ball and Patrick Michaels (who also happen to deny that CFCs cause damage to the ozone layer), and Fred Singer and Richard Lindzen (who, in earlier incarnations, had been active denialists of the link between passive smoking and lung cancer, despite neither having any medical expertise)." | |||
| ===Contrarianism=== | |||
| Lindzen has been characterized as a ].<ref name="Eilperin2009">{{cite web | last = Eilperin | first = Juliet | date = October, 2009 | url = http://outside.away.com/outside/culture/200710/richard-lindzen-3.html | title = Richard Lindzen: An Inconvenient Expert | work = ] | accessdate = December 8, 2009 }}</ref><ref name="Achenbach2006-06-05">{{cite news | last = Achenbach | first = Joel | url = http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003040068_warming05.html | title = Global-warming skeptics continue to punch away | date = June 5, 2006 | work = ] | accessdate = December 8, 2009 }}</ref><ref name="Stolz2007-04-13">{{cite web | last = Stolz | first = Kit | date = April 13, 2007 | title = For shame! | work = ] | url = http://www.grist.org/article/newsweek-blesses-richard-lindzen-ignores-pay-offs-from-fuel-companies | accessdate = December 8, 2009 }}</ref> Former student Daniel Kirk-Davidoff argued that this encourages him to choose a stance counter to consensus views, saying that “If you want to prove yourself a brilliant scientist, you don’t always agree with the consensus. You show you’re right and everyone else is wrong ... He certainly enjoys showing he’s right and everyone else is wrong."<ref name="SeedMagazine2006-08-24">{{cite web | date = August 24, 2006 | title = The Contrarian | work = ] | url = http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/the_contrarian/ | accessdate = December 8, 2009 }}</ref> | |||
| This characterization has been linked to Lindzen's view that lung cancer has only been weakly linked to smoking. Writing in ], Fred Guterl stated "Lindzen clearly relishes the role of naysayer. He'll even expound on how weakly lung cancer is linked to cigarette smoking. He speaks in full, impeccably logical paragraphs, and he punctuates his measured cadences with thoughtful drags on a cigarette"<ref name="Guterl2001-07-23">{{cite news | last = Guterl | first = Fred | date = July 23, 2001 | title = The Truth About Global Warming | work = ] | url = http://www.newsweek.com/id/78772 | accessdate = December 8, 2009 }}</ref> – an observation that was later echoed by ].<ref name="Williams2005">{{cite journal | last = Williams | first = Robyn | year = 2005 | title = Fair-weather friends? | journal = ] | issue = 12 | url = http://www.griffith.edu.au/griffithreview/campaign/webarticles/williams_ed12.pdf }}</ref> | |||
| Critics have used Lindzen's contrarian views on tobacco smoking to argue that his similarly contrarian position on climate change should not be accorded credibility.<ref name="Hyde2005-06-22">{{cite web | last = Hyde | first = David | date = June 22, 2005 | title = Getting to the bottom of climate-change lingo | work = ] | url = http://www.grist.org/article/hyde-terms/ | accessdate = December 8, 2009 }}</ref><ref name="Harrop2009-11-28">{{cite web | last = Harrop | first = Froma | date = November 28, 2009 | title = Whom Can You Trust on Climate Change? | work = ] | url = http://www.grist.org/article/hyde-terms/ | accessdate = December 8, 2009 }}</ref> On the other hand, advocates of scepticism with respect to the health risks of smoking have pointed to Lindzen's position on climate change as evidence against reliance on the findings of mainstream scientific organizations.<ref name="ForcesInternational">{{cite web | title = Collection of Important and Historical Documents, and Great Speeches | work = International Liberty News Network | publisher = FORCES International | url = http://www.forces.org/static_page/historical.php | accessdate = December 8, 2009 }}</ref> | |||
| ==Expert witness fees and expenses== | |||
| According to ] in a 1995 article in '']'', Lindzen "... charges oil and coal interests $2,500 a day for his consulting services; his 1991 trip to testify before a Senate committee was paid for by ] and a speech he wrote, entitled ''Global Warming: the Origin and Nature of Alleged Scientific Consensus'',<ref name=lindzen-regulation>{{cite article | url=http://eaps.mit.edu/faculty/lindzen/153_Regulation.pdf | author=Lindzen, R.S. | title=Global warming: the origin and nature of the alleged scientific consensus | journal=Regulation, Spring 1992 issue |pages=87–98 }}</ref> was underwritten by ]."<ref name=gelbspan-harper>{{cite web | url=http://dieoff.org/page82.htm | title=The Heat is On: The warming of the world's climate sparks a blaze of denial |author=Ross Gelbspan |publisher=] |date=December, 1995 }}</ref><ref name="frontline">{{cite web | url=http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/hotpolitics/reports/skeptics.html | title=The Doubters of Global Warming | publisher=] | author=Oriana Zill de Granados | accessdate=2007-11-24}}</ref> However, according to ] in a 2006 article in the '']'', Lindzen said that although he had accepted $10,000 in expenses and expert witness fees from "fossil-fuel types" in the 1990s, he had not received any money from these since.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.boston.com/news/science/articles/2006/08/30/mits_inconvenient_scientist/ |title=MIT's inconvenient scientist |work=The Boston Globe |author=Alex Beam |date=30 August 2006 |accessdate=17 March 2009 }}</ref> Juliet Eilperin is of the opinion that "While Lindzen did accept the expenses, this doesn't mean he's on anybody's payroll. He charges for his speeches, but so do prominent scientists who disagree with him about climate change."<ref name="Eilperin2009">{{cite web | last = Eilperin | first = Juliet | date = October, 2009 | url = http://outside.away.com/outside/culture/200710/richard-lindzen-3.html | title = Richard Lindzen: An Inconvenient Expert | work = ] | accessdate = December 8, 2009 }}</ref> Lindzen has elsewhere described the Gelbspan allegation as a "slander" and as "libelous."<ref>{{ cite journal |url=http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0809/0809.3762.pdf |author=Lindzen, R.S. |year=2009 |title=Climate Science: Is it currently designed to answer questions? |publisher=arXiv }} See page 14.</ref><ref name="ClimateOfFear">{{cite web|url=http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008220|title=Climate of Fear: Global-warming alarmists intimidate dissenting scientists into silence.|last=Lindzen|first=Richard|date=April 12, 2006|publisher=Wall Street Journal|accessdate=2009-08-08}}</ref> | |||
| Lindzen has contributed to ] including the ] and the ].<ref name="frontline"/> | |||
| ==See also== | ==See also== | ||
| ⚫ | *] | ||
| *] | *] | ||
Revision as of 09:04, 13 December 2009
| Richard S. Lindzen | |
|---|---|
| Born | (1940-02-08) 8 February 1940 (age 84) Webster, Massachusetts |
| Alma mater | Harvard University |
| Known for | Dynamic Meteorology, Atmospheric tides, Ozone photochemistry, quasi-biennial oscillation, Iris hypothesis |
| Awards | NCAR Outstanding Publication Award, Member of the NAS, AMS Meisinger Award, AMS Charney Award, AGU Macelwane Award, Leo Prize of the Wallin Foundation |
| Scientific career | |
| Fields | Atmospheric Physics |
| Institutions | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
| Doctoral advisor | Richard M. Goody |
| Notable students | Siu-shung Hong, John Boyd, Edwin K. Schneider, Jeffrey M. Forbes, Ka-Kit Tung, Christopher Snyder, Gerard Roe |
Richard Siegmund Lindzen (born February 8, 1940, Webster, Massachusetts) is an American atmospheric physicist and Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Lindzen is known for his work in the dynamics of the middle atmosphere, atmospheric tides and ozone photochemistry. He has published more than 200 books and scientific papers. He was one a lead author of Chapter 7, 'Physical Climate Processes and Feedbacks,' of the IPCC Third Assessment Report on climate change. Describing himself as a global warming "denier" rather than a skeptic, he has been a critic of some global warming theories and what he states are political pressures on climate scientists.
He hypothesized that the Earth may act like an infrared iris; increased sea surface temperature in the tropics would result in reduced cirrus clouds and thus more infrared radiation leakage from Earth's atmosphere. This hypothesis, generally rejected, suggests a negative feedback which would counter the effects of CO2 warming by lowering the climate sensitivity.
Career
Lindzen has published papers on Hadley circulation, monsoon meteorology, planetary atmospheres, hydrodynamic instability, mid-latitude weather, global heat transport, the water cycle, ice ages, seasonal atmospheric effects.. He is a member of the National Academy of Sciences and the Science, Health, and Economic Advisory Council at the Annapolis Center for Science-Based Public Policy. Educated at Harvard University (Ph.D., '64, S.M., '61, A.B., '60), he moved to MIT in 1983, prior to which he held positions at the University of Washington (1964–1965), Institute for Theoretical Meteorology, University of Oslo (1965–1966), National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) (1966–1967), University of Chicago (1968–1972) and Harvard University (1972–1983). He also briefly held a position of Visiting Lecturer at UCLA in 1967.
Awards and honors
Lindzen is a recipient of the American Meteorological Society's Meisinger and Charney Awards, American Geophysical Union's Macelwane Medal, and the Leo Prize from the Wallin Foundation in Goteborg, Sweden. He is a member of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), and the Norwegian Academy of Sciences and Letters, and was named Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the American Association for the Advancement of Sciences, the American Geophysical Union, and the American Meteorological Society. He is a corresponding member of the NAS Committee on Human Rights, and a member of the United States National Research Council Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate. He was a consultant to the Global Modeling and Simulation Group at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, and a Distinguished Visiting Scientist at California Institute of Technology's Jet Propulsion Laboratory.
See also
- Global warming controversy
- Scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming
References
- "Curriculum Vitae of Richard Siegmund Lindzen" (PDF). Retrieved 16 June 2009.
- "Richard Lindzen:Global Warming Denier". audio.wrko.com. Retrieved 2009-12-07.
{{cite web}}: Text "WRKO" ignored (help) - Lindzen, R.S., M.-D. Chou, and A.Y. Hou (2001). "Does the Earth have an adaptive infrared iris?" (PDF). Bull. Amer. Met. Soc. 82: 417–432. doi:10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082<0417:DTEHAA>2.3.CO;2.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - "Publications". Retrieved 2007-04-05.
- "Curriculum Vitae, Richard Siegmund Lindzen" (PDF). June 1, 2008. Retrieved 2009-03-18.
External links
- Richard Lindzen's Home page at MIT
- A List of Publications
- Profile at Physics World
- Testimony of Richard S. Lindzen Before the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works 2001