Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 19:52, 29 December 2005

The International Network for Inclusive Democracy

Non-notable, gets 9 unique Google hits (two of which are from WP). A related article was AfD'ed recently in a sockpuppet-ridden nomination, and the creator(s) of this article insist that Misplaced Pages has a political agenda against him/them. They also kept putting up a copyright violation at Inclusive Democracy, which has now been protected against recreation. - ulayiti (talk) 14:10, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Assertion of notability is not the same as notability; the group itself could be easily speedied since it has had ample time to provide references and it hasn't. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 14:41, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable, per nomination and without political bias of any sort, thank you. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 15:41, Dec. 28, 2005
  • Furthermore, if the group is unknown to anybody outside its own membership, it is categorically impossible for a neutral and informative article on this topic to exist, on Misplaced Pages or anywhere. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 15:44, Dec. 28, 2005
• Comment: Actually, this could be speedied under the new wording of A7: 'An article about a group of people that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject.' I'm not going to do that now though, mainly because I can't be bothered and it's going to be deleted anyway. - ulayiti (talk) 16:11, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as it would be a terrible shame to spoil the author's conspiracy theory by failing to delete such obvious twaddle. Just zis  Guy, you know? / AfD? 18:31, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

• Comment Yesterday you put a notice asking us to do some cleaning up in the Network page —no warning at all up to then!-and we immediately responded with some cleaning up, to find today an AfD supported by the well known duo of the Liberal Democrat and the anarcho-CAPITALIST who seem determined to delete any trace of the Inclusive Democracy project from their “Encyclopedia”, because they are afraid of new concepts. And of course they were immediately supported by other administradroids who are much more interested in such important topics as the World of Darkness, creationism and retaining the status-quo than in a new Network promoting a new social project. Misplaced Pages is all yours folks! We do not care about you because you confirmed all the accusations being published at the moment in the world press about the bias and unreliability of this joke Encyclopedia, and we will help as much as we can to help all those who do not know what is going on here about how entries are selected and de-selected and the ‘expertise’ of so-called administradroids who in the last instance decide what should appear here and what not! The field is in your favor and you call your rubberstamp gang, when the game gets too tough, to power play with the illusion of neutrality and objectivity. Misplaced Pages is a failure in progress. I guess you have no priority to trace the IP of the pornographer, which really shows where your heads are.User:john sargis 23:59, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
  • OMG like I'm so afraid as an 'administradroid' of any new concepts that might accidentally enter my field of vision, and that's why I advocate deleting most of the content of Misplaced Pages, including articles such as Quantum mechanics which I don't understand anyway. Or would it perhaps have something to do with the fact that nobody cares about your little 'network'. It gets nine Google hits, for Pete's sake! My user name, for example, gets 38,600. That's what, over four thousand times more than that, and I still don't have an article about myself here. So can you please get a clue of what Misplaced Pages is about, and stop making personal attacks on my userpage. That's called vandalism. - ulayiti (talk) 07:24, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

REGRESSION IN WIKIPEDIA

• Alas! Nowadays, the validity of an entry or a network depends on "google hits" and popularity. I'm sure that the enlightment's encyclopaedists were determining their entries on the basis of popularity (for example the entry "ratio" would do zillion hits back then)! Do you know all you "sarcastic Mr know it all", how many google hits you will find about McDonald's or Madonna; Ofcourse, this thing proves that they are more important... Adorno would commit suicide after a small "tour" in here...--TheVel 10:49, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
  • More importantly, it proves that a wikipedia editor adding information about McDonald's or Madonna can cite non-propogandist sources. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 11:54, Dec. 29, 2005
    • More regression: network's entry is depended on people who identify the promotion of democratic values with propaganda. What to say... And enough with naivety: citing Madonna and McDonald's means propagandizing capitalist values... THERE IS NO NEUTRAL POINT OF VIEW!

--TheVel 13:28, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

• Comment. If notability for Misplaced Pages is measured by Google hits then this could well explain the low quality information it provides for which it is justifiably criticised by the world press. You should better however concentrate on such items like the bios of Hollywood stars and football players (or the other important items mentioned by another user above) and forget everything else! This would surely expand enormously the number of Google hits you get. As regards vandalism, I wonder why comments by an administrator above that “the group is unknown to anybody outside its own membership” do not cosntitute vandalism of the worst kind, apart from revealing the political bias of an anarcho-capitalist (i.e. someone who wishes to restrict the powers of the state in order to leave the market--namely the law of the jungle-- completely free to destroy all the weak in this world. How he is so sure of this—unless of course he asked the likes of the people he frequently meets in Hilton, Sheraton and the like! 10.55: Dec. 29, 2005 (UTC)
  • No. Vandalism of the worst kind might include saying "Mr. Fotopolis was involved in the Kennedy assassination" when there is no evidence to support the claim. If you see no difference between those two statements, you might be unable to objectively contribute to this discussion. Also, you might consider not making attacks based on the content of my user page (which has existed, without complaint, for a greater period of time than the article being discussed). Will your next one be "Freakofnurture has lost 2 of 3 chess games"? — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 11:54, Dec. 29, 2005
• Delete. Should I wear my new WikiCabal pin in public? (ESkog) 11:13, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete because the cabal asked me to. David | Talk 11:15, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

• Comment Ulayiti, I guess the truth hurts. That's why you deleted the comment at your page. By the way Quantum mechanics is not a new concept, except maybe in your mind, of course. Your page was not vandalized, but briefly psychoanalyzed. However, we haven't heard from any administrator about tracing the pornographic vandalism at our page. I am starting to believe it came from, yes, administradroid(s)of wiki. As a cabal you prove our point all the time.User:john sargis 6:26, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

• CommentNo surprise that a well known notable and international figure like David Boothroyd, who deserves his own extended entry in Misplaced Pages, could not accept non-notable entries like that of the network! 11:50, 29 Dec.2005

• Vanity FreakofNuture is resorting to vanity ("my page has existed longer..."), as well as ulayiti ("my user name gets 38,600 hits"). FreakofNurture, is the vandalism of which you speak the fact that you spelled Fotopoulos incorrectly? The assassination which you refer to was actually a vandalization which occurred and stayed on the pages of wiki for several months, when Seigenthaler was accused of being involved in the assassination. It doesn't say much for the reliability and expertise of information of the administrators at wiki. Anon (in itself unreliable)has stated that Boothroyd is so great, but does not provide anything notable he has invented. You always try to manipulate the field of play. User:john sargis 7:56, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Yes, and only your organization has found it offensive so far. I thought this would hinge on my chess match record, but you've dug deeper by discrediting me on the basis of spelling errors. Really cool, I'll remember that some time, but who is this Boothroyd of whom you speak? — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 19:07, Dec. 29, 2005
    • Self. David | Talk 19:52, 29 December 2005 (UTC)