Revision as of 02:36, 22 December 2009 editB. Fairbairn (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,360 edits →Queen← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:07, 22 December 2009 edit undoB. Fairbairn (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,360 edits →QueenNext edit → | ||
Line 247: | Line 247: | ||
B) If it is not too personal, why are you so fascinated by Ted Bundy? Do you idolise him?<br> | B) If it is not too personal, why are you so fascinated by Ted Bundy? Do you idolise him?<br> | ||
] (]) 02:28, 22 December 2009 (UTC)</i> | ] (]) 02:28, 22 December 2009 (UTC)</i> | ||
:Okay, okay - I withdraw these questions. | |||
:I wonder why it is though that you are stalking me. It is highly inappropriate. I will report <i>you</i> if you keep it up. | |||
:First you kept reverting Ted Bundy, and then George Bush Junior and Ann Rule. | |||
:Just get off my back and stop interfering with me. | |||
:] (]) 03:07, 22 December 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:07, 22 December 2009
edit count | edit summary usageCurrent discussion | ||||||||
Always remember - first assume good faith... sometimes pigs do fly... and...Jimbo is watching you! The hows-and-whys of this talk pageBecause this is my own user talk page, I have certain rules and standards as to how I like to maintain it.
Thanks for your understanding - may your Misplaced Pages edits be correct, well-referenced and relevant and may you have a great Misplaced Pages day! Barnstar
Userboxes
Mantle décor
Glenn BeckAppreciate your edits Kelly, but perhaps you could read through this talk section and this talk section and comment on your changes. We went through several days gaining some consensus on the section you're rewriting. Not to say that your changes will not be accepted, but they should probably be discussed as a bit of discussion went into the current writing. This was the reason ObserverNY reverted your change earlier. Morphh 19:29, 03 October 2009 (UTC)
Random commentGotta say, I'm impressed by your userboxes -- there are a few in there I wouldn't have expected to see on the same page. :-) --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:49, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
BickeringNo, I have been jerky. I also added info that was sourced but the inline citation was in the wrong place. I don't recall ever adding unsourced info on a BLP since it is a guideline that cannot be dismissed. Most important, I have admitted to my mistakes and tried to correct them. I don't even mind apologizing to another editor when it is due. Your last comment at the Glenn Beck talk page pretty much summarizes the difference. If you want to continue to bicker about it we should do it on the talk page. Cptnono (talk) 00:54, 7 October 2009 (UTC) MessageMessaged the user regarding his harassment. I've also reported the incident to be reviewed by other editors. Happy editing! Netalarmtalk 06:17, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
WQAI dont like Eusebus (or whatever his name is) and how he treated you or how he closed out the discussion. If you think it needs further looking into, or would like Equazcion or myself to mediate there with you and whatever other party you would like, I will reopen it. In fact I'd love to reopen it just because of Eusebus' rudeness on my talk page after I asked him on his talk page to apologize to you for his dismissive attitude. Your call, but I think, whether you were really wronged per Misplaced Pages policy or not, you feel hurt and aggrieved, and I will help you get closure (especially if it means pissing off Eusebus).Camelbinky (talk) 04:03, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank youI was going to message you to thank you for taking a stand with Eusebeus. Thanks for coming to me and expressing your thoughts regarding this chain of events. Yes, I feel wronged. All the way from the admins at the AN/I board today (about which Bwilkins later stated to SarekofVulcan on Sarek's talk page that they should all be ashamed of themselves, BTW) to the treatment I received over this civility issue. I just don't get why admins think they can behave this way and get away with it (maybe because they've been allowed to get away with it?). Anyway...yes, I would like some mediation/arbitration, whatever - in good faith I went and asked for someone to look into the civility issue (at the advice of Bwilkins, an admin) because I would like for the issue(s) JoyDiamond has with me to stop. I don't see her stopping, and someone obviously has to make it stop - one way or another. Thanks for being the adult here - I was starting to think that no one around here is anymore. ;-) SkagitRiverQueen (talk) 04:13, 7 November 2009 (UTC) Hello, SkagitRiverQueen. I have left a message that you may be interested in at JoyDiamond's talk page.You can remove this notice at any time by removing this section. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:33, 7 November 2009 (UTC) Re: SpencerAh...gotcha. I didn't even bother to check the user's history, I just figured they were new and thought the talk page was there for complaints. I didn't mean to get snippy with you, I just get rather irritated by those "delete this because I don't like it" type of comments. Pinkadelica 04:17, 10 November 2009 (UTC) WP:WQASomeone called User:Regisfugit has opened a Wikiquette Alert regarding you. Crafty (talk) 04:33, 11 November 2009 (UTC) ANI noticeHello, SkagitRiverQueen. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. GiantSnowman 11:37, 15 November 2009 (UTC) Beverley Jean MorrowI have removed the entry for Beverley Jean Morrow in the article Mount Vernon, Washington. Misplaced Pages has no article on her, and the entry doesn't even say on what grounds she was considered for the peace prize (those grounds, not the mere fact she was being considered, is what the entry should have stated). In lists of notable people from such and such place, we expect every entry to have an article, and when an article about someone on such a list is deleted, we expect the entry to be removed as well. -- Blanchardb -- timed 15:55, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletionsJust a note: Other editors are allowed to remove speedy delete tags, as long as they aren't the article creator. If someone removes a speedy delete tag it's best to then nominate the article for AfD (regular deletion discussion). Speedy deletion is only for the most obvious and uncontroversial cases, so if there's disagreement over whether or not a page should be deleted, it generally needs to be discussed at AfD. ANI is not the place to go. WP:POLITICIAN states: "Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage. Generally speaking, mayors are likely to meet this criterion, as are members of the main citywide government or council of a major metropolitan city." I'm not taking sides myself, but from the above, there are at least reasonable grounds to argue against deletion, so it's not an obvious enough case as to warrant a speedy. I would take this to AfD if I were you. If you'd like to do that and need help, let me know. Equazcion (talk) 21:22, 25 Nov 2009 (UTC)
WashingtonThanks for your post. I wholeheartedly agree that Washington is one of the most beautiful places on earth. There are some pretty nice parts of the East, like the White Mountains in New Hampshire, but they don't compare. I've been to Israel, too, and that's another one of my favorites :). When I was in Washington I took a whale watching trip that specifically went to the places the Orcas like to go. They are amazing animals. I take it that you also like watching birds. I wish I knew more about birds than I do, given that Central Park and other parks in New York are major stops along the bird migration routes and we get some very interesting ones. And BTW, I think you were right about "incensed" and "posited." Take care, AFriedman (talk) 22:44, 3 December 2009 (UTC) Happy Monday! --AFriedman (talk) 18:04, 7 December 2009 (UTC) has extended an olive branch of peace.
Ted BundyHi, I am trying hard to get everyone to focus more on improving the article than arguing or just revert warring. First, I saw the 3RR notice board comments so I went to EdJohnston's talk to clarify. I needed to know what was agreed upon about taking a week off from editing the Bundy article and if you were still able to contribute to the talk page. Ed said yes to the talk page so here I am. I answered and asked questions on the recent conversations going on there. I have a question for you under the title 'Judges comments' that I wwould appreciate you taking some time to answer if you would. I made three different comments there which shouldn't be hard to locate. Sorry but I am really trying hard to type more but my hands are really tired right now. If you have any questions about what I've said please don't hesitate. I am about to go off line for awhile but I will try to keep a look out for any comments. You can also ping me at my talk page if I miss something. Thanks, --CrohnieGal 16:06, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Archive 1Talk page entries that took up waaaaay too much space have been archived here.. QueenA) How long have you been a queen, dearie? ;-)
|