Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 01:47, 5 January 2010

Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on your talk page unless you prefer otherwise as usually noted on your talk page. If you are an editor without an account, I will reply here. When leaving messages, please keep these tips in mind: Use a descriptive subject/headline. If you are asking a question about an article, please tell me which article you are referring to. Please do not add your message to another editor's conversation unless you are commenting on the same topic. Start a new section, unless... If you are continuing a conversation with me, please edit the relevant section instead of starting a new section. Click here to leave me a message

If you are here to ask me why I deleted your article, please read the common reasons why I have deleted your article.

Archives

2006 April 2006 – June 2006 July 2006 – September 2006 October 2006 – December 2006 2007 January 2007 – March 2007 April 2007 – June 2007 July 2007 – September 2007 October 2007 – December 2007 2008 January 2008 – March 2008 April 2008 – June 2008 July 2008 – September 2008 October 2008 – December 2008 2009 January 2009 – March 2009 April 2009 – June 2009 July 2009 – September 2009 October 2009 – December 2009 2010 January 2010 – March 2010 April 2010 – June 2010 July 2010 – September 2010 October 2010 – December 2010 2011 January 2011 – March 2011 April 2011 – June 2011 July 2011 – September 2011 October 2011 – December 2011 2012 January 2012 – March 2012 April 2012 – June 2012 July 2012 – September 2012 October 2012 – December 2012 2013 January 2013 – March 2013 April 2013 – June 2013 July 2013 – September 2013 October 2013 – December 2013 2014 January 2014 – March 2014 April 2014 – June 2014 July 2014 – August 2014 2015 March 2015 April 2015 – June 2015 July 2015 – September 2015 October 2015 – December 2015 2016 March 2016 April 2016 – June 2016 July 2016 – September 2016 December 2016 2017 January 2017 – March 2017 2018 January 2018 – June 2018 July 2018 – September 2018 October 2018 – December 2018 2019 2019 2020 2020 2021 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023

Montgomery Improvement Association

What authority do you have on the Montgomery Improvement Association to remove names that were added -- and historically correct? ChristopherHerring (talk) 02:49, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

They were redlinks, which means there are no articles on the people named. --Thejadefalcon_{The bird's seeds} 02:51, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:38, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

WP:AIV2

Not so fast. 17 new ones just turned up. ←Baseball Bugs carrots→ 06:47, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Oh, wait... That was in another version of wikipedia in a parallel universe that my internet connection picks up from time to time. Some kind of short in the router. Sorry. My mistake. 0:) ←Baseball Bugs carrots→ 06:50, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:52, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

You don't take credit? You're too modest. You should take credit for your efforts. Meanwhile, back in that parallel universe, the Chicago Cubs recently won their 27th World Series. The New York Yankees, alas, have not won since 1908. And I, alas, can only read about it, as the fare for crossing through the portal is a million razzbuckniks, and I'm a little short. ←Baseball Bugs carrots→ 07:01, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

How to write Good Test Cases and Bug Reports

Hi,

Please let me know the reasons why my article "How to write Good Test Cases and Bug Reports" is for deletions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Qainfotech09 (talk • contribs) 09:08, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 09:41, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

I wanted to change the title of my wiki page

Hello Admin,

I wanted to change the title of my wiki page http://en.wikipedia.org/How_to_write_Good_Test_Cases_and_Bug_Reports. Please let me know how to do it. Or else can you please change the title to "Writing Software Test Cases and Bug Reports". I will be very grateful if you can help me out. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Qainfotech09 (talk • contribs) 06:37, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 09:27, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

can I have my page back?

Hi, I did tag my sub-userpage for deletion a while back (2-3 days ago) but I have had a change of heart. Is there anyway that you can bring it back for me? Thanks--Coldplay Expért 22:20, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Yes. All admins have the power to undelete something. --Thejadefalcon_{The bird's seeds} 22:22, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Done. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:28, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Hello!

I ran across your name while perusing the 'pedia under my other identity, and figured I'd log in to this account to say hi. I hope all is well! -Tapir Terrific (talk) 03:09, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Hello there! Funny, I was just thinking of you the other day. Glad to see that you're still around, though under your other alias. Everything is fine and I hope the same goes for you. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:32, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Hoodatdat

I noticed you blocked him as a sock. Who is it a sock of?--Crossmr (talk) 04:44, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:48, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Blue Star :)

(examines with magnifying glass) Say, Meaghan, are you aware these diamonds are fake? :P Congratulations, Gogo Dodo. --Thejadefalcon_{The bird's seeds} 23:44, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Shhh, he's not supposed to find out --Meaghan 00:08, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Righty-ho! (neuralyses Gogo Dodo) They're real. --Thejadefalcon_{The bird's seeds} 00:12, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations, Gogo Dodo! December21st2012Freak (talk) 05:34, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Diamonds? What diamonds? I can't see a thing. The star is way too bright and I'm a bit dazzled (and humbled!). Where's my glasses? Can't see anything... <klonk!> Oh, that was the door... Ow... -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 09:35, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

About deleting my article on Cyberskies

I did not write the article with my intention as advertising! Sorry..:(

Actually i am just new at this so if you could write an article on it and then if i could read it maybe i could understand how to write biographies without making it sound biast or without making it look like an advertising campaign!

It would be really nice if u cold write an article on Cyberskies instead of me tryin again!

Please do!

And if you need any more information then u can contact its owner (Thats how i spoke to him :D)

Thanking you,

                                                                    Ricky Goldie.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.163.2.249 (talk) 08:57, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Since I know very little about this particular website nor do I have much interest in it, I am going to have to decline writing it for you. If you want to try to rewrite the article yourself, I suggest you take a look at Misplaced Pages:Your first article. If you don't want to write it, but still want an article created about it, I suggest that you list the request at Misplaced Pages:Requested articles. Hopefully somebody will be interested in the website enough that they would be willing to write the article. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 09:31, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

page deletion

Hello - you recently deleted my page (I think!) I'm new to this - and there was a copyright issue, however I work for the website so the Copyright is mine to give permission on, which I do. What do I need to do to get the page reinstated? If you could let me know that would be great. Many thanks. Andrew —Preceding unsigned comment added by Awoollatt (talk • contribs) 22:24, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:28, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

ok, I understand clearly now. Thanks very much for your help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Awoollatt (talk • contribs) 22:40, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Question

How come other games such as Maplestory and Runescape are on Wiki? Isn't that advertising?

What makes the other thing Advertising that these are not? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eddy1305 (talk • contribs) 06:15, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:19, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Randy Disher as Summit, New Jersey fictional character, chief of police

Wondering whether this might be re-included? I agree he's a fictional character. But these TV shows can be extremely popular, and the popularity can have the effect of changing peoples' thinking about topics like Summit, NJ, and if a lot of people watching get an idea of "Summit NJ" from the show, then perhaps it should be in the article somewhere? Perhaps not in "notable residents" but it should be mentioned somewhere?--Tomwsulcer (talk) 13:41, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:05, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, I put RD on the Summit page in a "In popular culture" section as per your suggestion, thanx.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 22:38, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank You

Thank you so much for deleting the page The Bath Towelz WHILE I was working on fixing it. I am so glad you wasted all of my time. Rpe100 (talk) 06:39, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:45, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Mikey Pizano article

I put a DB tag on this just after you deleted it! Could you delete it again? Thanks - oh, ignore that, I see you already have! -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 21:10, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

• Actually, it was PMDrive1061 (talk · contribs)! -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 21:12, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, he is a rather busy admin. =) There is a lot of server lag going on right now which is causing a lot of deletes to get recreated by NP patrollers tagging the article post delete. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:14, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Charles Stacey Supreme

How do I get the information back for Charles Stacey Supreme? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrbelvedere1 (talk • contribs) 14:28, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:52, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

You are seriously mistaken

I have added constructive part in Hastinapur "How to Reach", and thus I added Reference which I have taken from website. I agree in Disneyland I did a mistake, but not in other places.

Please reconsider.

Best regards, Namit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Namit80 (talk • contribs) 01:12, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:56, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

I am done with wikipedia

Mr Gogo,

For your kind informatiotn, content I have added you didn't remove it completely. So, I have undo all my changes and that was my last edit with wikipedia. Because of guys like you, people are discourage as soon as they start contributing.

It doesn't matter to me if you block me for single day or whole lifetime because this is the last time I am writing on wikipedia and that to you. But don't think wikipedia is the end, web is full of such portals, may be I will find better and more co-operative people somewhere else.

Only thing I wanted to share with you is that you should widen your approach of analyzing what is spam and what is not. Best of luck and thanks for feedback.

Best regards, Namit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Namit80 (talk • contribs) 09:23, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Derrick"Dee Rick"Crayton

Noticed that this user keeps re-creating the same page about himself. They're very well-designed pages but are obviously WP:SPEEDY candidates, and the repetitive nature of his actions makes me wonder what the appropriate steps to take are. I know WP:AIV doesn't seem appropriate here (ie not intended to "punish," etc.), but it looks like this is at least the third or fourth time this user has re-created the same page and he doesn't seem to be getting the message. Any thoughts? I don't want to do anything harsh -- kid is clearly putting a lot of effort behind what is just an unfortunately misguided project! Ginsengbomb (talk) 01:36, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

(the alternative take on my above thoughts is that this is a user who's been told several times to stop what he's doing and he appears to continue doing it...and on top of that, he's got fairly strong Wiki-editing chops, hehe) Ginsengbomb (talk) 01:39, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:13, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Rickroll vandal block notice

{{uw-rickrollblock}}, aka {{rickroll}}. Enjoy. — Sizzle Flambé (☎/✍) 08:40, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Vijay Singh Suryawanshi

Not too long ago, you blocked this user for a period of 31hrs for link spamming and removing content. It seems that the block did not work and s/he has started to assume ownership again, reverting nearly all edits to 'his articles'. He has yet again been deleting maintenance and other various templates without discussion. I'm merely letting you know, since you did ask me to do so before. _Pervez (Push) 19:19, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:47, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Seasons Greetings

Sky Attacker the legend reborn... is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Xmas, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hannukah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec09}} to your friends' talk pages.

--Sky Attacker the legend reborn... 03:03, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Favor: Send me a deleted page please!

Hi, you deleted one of my pages quite some time ago, and I would really like to see the page again. Not to post it to Wiki, just for personal use.

If you can send me the deleted version of: http://en.wikipedia.org/Jennifer_Fabes

I would really appreciate it. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by B-Fir3 (talk • contribs) 04:57, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:44, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Deleted Articles

Hey, why did you deleted my article? Meanie! Nah, just kidding there. :) But I do have a question concerning two deleted band pages: Bunnydrums and Malaria!. An editor at Talk:List of post-punk bands insists that they're notable and won't let the entries be removed. Some of the sources he referenced don't seem to be justifiable, but Bunnydrum's being in allmusic and barnesandnoble makes me wonder. What content did the deleted articles have and would the sources help? And if so, which would be simpler: deletion review or just start the articles anew? -WarthogDemon 03:40, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Spill.com deletion reversal

Hi, the page for Spill.com was deleted by yourself, stating that there were no exterior sources of their worth. I have resolved this as they were winners of the 2009 Podcast awards as stated here: http://www.podcastawards.com/ , and here: http://en.wikipedia.org/Podcast_Awards I think this is enough to allow the article back up on the site. I have made sure it is correctly formatted and referenced. I would appreciate this very much. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidbray2 (talk • contribs) 15:55, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:14, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

re FYI: Spill.com

Okay, thank you. :) Cirt (talk) 19:19, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Spill.com

Hi, I recently created a new page for Spill.com. I'm not associated with the people previously trying to make this webpage but I do realize that it has been deleted a number of times for lack of reliability and notability. I would like to point out that first, the site has become more notable since then by winning an award for their podcasts, as mentioned here, http://en.wikipedia.org/Podcast_Awards/ Secondly, I would like to point out that my references include two seminal newspaper articles that directly document the history and development of spill.com and they are much more reputable and direct then previous references involving cnn and other news sites --Smithers45 (talk) 08:45, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:54, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Well the only place that i copied any of the original deleted article was in the podcast and review style sections. I did however remove some of this bisases, profanity and general advertising for the site and added signifigantly more citations. I saved the rest of those parts because I have been an active member of the website and they generally were correct. I didn't get the text from deleted versions of the page, i got them from http://wikibin.org/articles/spill.com.html, which is another wiki site which operates under the GNU free documentation license. I did however write a completely rewritten lead, history and awards section which was completely original, along with more citations. After having created the page, i found the other user davidbrayer or whatever and i found that the history section he had used was directly copy and pasted from one of the Austin Chronicle news articles and thats why i would consider myself not associated with him. Considering it's a site that gets 1.5 million page views a month, it deserves a Misplaced Pages pageSmithers45 (talk) 17:22, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:43, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Wow, I'm incredibly dumb, Wikinbin being a place for a deleted article makes total sense now, sorry about that. I would agree that the only really comprehensive, third party article pertaining only to spill.com is the Austin chronicle one from 2008. However, I did just find one more site that seems to be a neutral third party press source that isn't a PR reprint from nerve.com, you should check it out in the history section.Smithers45 (talk) 20:57, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:59, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Re: Priyanka Bhatia777 (talk · contribs)

Feel free to reblock them. Honestly, I am rarely interested in following the socks, and blocked this one for a week simply because standing alone, this account was acting disruptively. Materialscientist (talk) 02:15, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:45, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

60.217.248.142

I just noticed that you blocked them as a proxy. There's a whole bunch here are they all proxies? Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 07:54, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure either. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 07:58, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Most appear to have been blocked for 24 hours. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 08:04, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Sounds good. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 08:18, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Ah, of course. Seems to have stopped now. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 08:23, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

In that case I'll leave them. Really don't want to spend time on ANI having to explain why I change all the blocks. If they are back again I'll go for a longer period. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 08:36, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

WP:AIV

Oh my God, I can't believe it's empty! bibliomaniac15 06:38, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

As of the time of the timestamp, I can believe it. bibliomaniac15 06:44, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Revitopia

Good morning. I've got an editor asking for this article to be undeleted. They attempted to add a DRV-undelete tag, but the article has not been sent to DRV or undeleted. The request on the article's talk page consists of the following text:

Dear Admin, A consensus on the page is not being reached because not enough time is being given for all parties to review before admin action is taken. Some parties work during the day and need at least a couple days to reply from other websites they are involved in. Please lock this page from editing till discussion can be finished. Thank you,SRobbins (talk) 21:57, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

I'll let the editor know that I posted this message, and that they should discuss the matter with you as the deleting admin. I'm also deleting the article and talk page as test pages - the article hasn't actually been undeleted, so the template is in error. UltraExactZZ ~ Did 16:04, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:48, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi Gogo, not enough time was given for proper formatting. The article was up and taken down in a day. This makes it next to impossible for other editors to refine the site. More time is needed for Misplaced Pages:Peer review . Not to mention there was no peer review notice posted by the complainant. This standard procedure is what has always helped an article develop and evolve. I was in the process of gathering independent, published works as you mentioned when I came back to find the work I did deleted. So as you can see, this makes the editorial process very frustrating. The article also didn’t exist based on notability; it existed based on its significance. In reviewing the guidelines for speedy deletion it passes in this area as it is significant that such a widely used program by its industry does not have other sites dedicated to that use.

On a side note I have never had so many problems in all the years of editing for Misplaced Pages as I have in the past 2 years. It seems like most editors prefer to subtract from Misplaced Pages then to actually work on something go through the editorial process spirit that Misplaced Pages was founded on. I encourage Admins and moderators like yourself to demand more from these people then to just go forward with an deletion. Good luck and please ask for more from the editors who just read the guidelines to be able to pick apart other peoples work. Demand them to get involved and work on the article. Thank you for allowing the recreation of it, I will take all notes into consider before recreating. Again good luck and cheers, SRobbins (talk) 20:50, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:32, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Dear Gogo Dodo,
Wishing you, your family, and friends a very merry Christmas (or whatever you celebrate at this time of year), and I hope that the new year will be a good one, in real life, and on the wiki. There is always a reason to spread the holiday spirit; it's a special time of year of almost everyone. ;)
Love and best wishes, Meaghan - _Christmas! - 00:10, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

December21st2012Freak is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

December21st2012Freak 00:23, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Its WorldBasketball and making article about people who deserves to be there

Hello Mr.GOGO DODO Im just sending you this message to get more info why u deleted the article: Maarouf Mawloud... and whats the right things to let this article official.. thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by WorldBasketball (talk • contribs)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:28, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!!

Once again it is festive season, a time where festive decorations are displayed and gifts are swapped; but what about the true meaning of christmas? The true meaning of christmas is about the fight for freedom and how in times of hardship and misery, one person leads their people to freedom as a great warrior; for those who fight for a cause are warriors and those who fight for a worthy cause are great warriors. Such an act earns respect and honour; but most importantly, brings happiness to their people. So to achieve this as happiness lies in other people's happiness and greatness lies in how you deal with little people, we selflessly think of others in the hope that they will be happy this christmas.

Hi Gogo Dodo, have a very Merry Christmas and A Happy New Year 2010!
 Set Sail For The Seven Seas 

  Set Sail For The Seven Seas  6° 35' 0" NET   00:26, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Handling persistent vandal

I was particularly impressed with the prompt handling of User talk:Mikezvc who was exhibiting persistent vandalism. Just a few years ago, vandals were on the ascendant with editors such as myself on the defensive, required to "prove" beyond a reasonable doubt that a vandal was really a vandal! I questioned my involvement with Misplaced Pages. Some editors with longer service most likely became discouraged and left.

Mercifully, the corps of admins that then handled vandals was either replaced or outvoted by reformers and now a legitimate editor may experience maybe 20% of the vandalism we had then. Thanks to people like you! Student7 (talk) 23:21, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

(for the benefit of other readers, this vandal was handled even before I had the opportunity to complain about him! Student7 (talk) 23:26, 26 December 2009 (UTC))

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:11, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

jim bell article

I believe that I am the victim of a 'persistent vandal': Three times in the last 36 hours I have tried to edit the article, "Jim Bell", to add paragraphs. I am the subject of that article. Three times I have added paragraphs, three times the paragraphs were 'quickly' removed. There was nothing inflammatory, controversial, libelous, etc. I have not received any explanation for this deletion, either.James dalton bell (talk) 08:25, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:06, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for getting rid of vandalism images on that women's page...

:) much appreciated. --Huik01 (talk) 06:59, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Scott Harrington

Good find on that source at your library! Thank you for going out and doing the legwork to find that. —C.Fred (talk) 16:45, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Sorry

I feel bad for all those vandalisms. Anyways, hello —Preceding unsigned comment added by Editpowah (talk • contribs) 21:18, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Controversial subjects? 'jim bell' article

1. My allegations of forged documents date back to my June 2003 lawsuit, "James Dalton Bell v. District Courts of Tacoma and Seattle". Content has been on the web for 5+ years. _YOU_ shouldn't be trying to suppress my commentary, UNLESS you FIRST make the appropriate objections through talk:jim bell, and the community agrees. You appear to be engaging in 'drive-by-editing'. You DELETE things, within HOURS, deleting comments which are either non-controversial, or have been well reported on the Internet files on me. You do not put the deleted content on the talk:jim bell article for others to consider and comment on. I did. You've said NOTHING so far. You do so in an article ('jim bell') in which you do not regularly contribute. I'd call that 'drive-by-editing'. You probably do that a lot. 2. My discoveries on Climate Change (late June 2009) have been reported (by me) to 40+ foreign embassies, the (American) Dept of Energy (DOE), NIST (National Institutes on Standards and Technology), and two certified letters (two _each_!) to Al Gore and President Obama. The fact that I, Jim Bell, claim to have done this is VERIFIABLE: Give me a telephone call at 360-696-4308. Or, VISIT me at 7214 Corregidor, Vancouver WA 98664 (USA). Or, I would be happy to call you. I would also be happy to FAX you copies of the relevant letters. 3. I do not doubt that the Federal Government (nor its minions) believes that I should not be posting this news in a publicly-accessible area. 4. From reading dozens of other Misplaced Pages articles, it is quite clear that MANY of them contain little (or a limited amount) of publicly-available sourced statements. Yet, those articles remain unmolested. Mine, in contrast, does not. That's a 'double-standard'! —Preceding unsigned comment added by James dalton bell (talk • contribs) 22:36, 31 December 2009 (UTC) 5. After just seeing that you (or somebody) have, YET AGAIN, deleted EVERYTHING I, yet again, I must conclude that you have decided that you will simply not allow me to make ANY edits, changes, modifications, or additions to 'jim bell'. The extremely serious nature of your misconduct, its persistence and rapidity, strongly suggests that you are acting on 'someone's' behalf. In effect, your actions improperly 'defend' the article 'jim bell' 's CURRENTLY erroneous and biased content ('half-truths', etc). I'd say your actions constitute 'libel' and 'false light'. And yes, now I'm enough of a lawyer that I could write the entire lawsuit MYSELF. The odd thing is, I'm very much a supporter of the 'Misplaced Pages' idea. But manipulation ('politically' motivated) can be expected to occur, and HAS occurred, by you on others' behalf.—Preceding unsigned comment added by James dalton bell (talk • contribs)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:58, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Your 'reply' was nonsense. I am not objecting to your (or anyone else) deleting ANY posting, at ANY time. I am complaining, repeatedly and severely, about your malicious actions. Hint: Go back and actually RESPOND to my specific and detailed objections, above. You REPEATEDLY Italic textremove EVERYTHING I have added, an action which smacks not merely of censorship, but in fact carefully-directed sabotage. Further, you do not receive (or even seek!) a consensus from the community before you do your 'drive-bys'. Further, you don't put those deleted edits into any 'talk:' page for discussion, as if you are carefully trying to avoid letting any other user develop a contrary opinion. And, you also haven't responded to my assertions that there are extreme double-standards at work, relative to other Wiki articles: Other articles frequently, and in fact usually, have MANY unattributed statements, even when they also include citations. By repeatedly deleting EVERY posting I make, ALL ALL ALL of them (and not just portions) you are either hypocritically applying 'rules' that are already inconsistently employed, or you are demonstrating that you have been instructed to (or have taken it upon yourself to) delete 'everything' I post, without any exception whatsoever. Your complete inability to address these objections demonstrates this. And as for 'legal threats': Your self-serving comment merely points up YOUR problem. I was discussing LEGAL ISSUES, double-standards, and various examples of malicious and hostile behavior by you. And, Wiki's 'policy' (against 'legal threats', though I don't agree I made one!) does not bind me. Fix your head. Actually ANSWER my objections! I can easily see from others' objections that one of your practices is to VERY QUICKLY edit, usually by deleting, others' posts. You try to destroy: You don't build up. You don't contribute anything. James dalton bell (talk) 16:51, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:33, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

You continue with your nonsense. No, you DID NOT tell me exactly 'why' my edits were removed. Rather, you tried to justify it based on a cockeyed reading of rules, rules which are in themselves biased: Somehow, you give preference to UNRELIABLE sources (articles, etc), and you resist accepting posts from an utterly reliable source! (Me.) Reliable, in the sense that I am me, and I am accurately posting what I have done, and believe, etc. There is no requirement that I post THIRD PARTY references to 'my allegatiions': All you need to do is to Google "James Dalton Bell v. USA, et al" (www.mail-archive.com/cypherpunks@cyberpass.net/msg00854.html) and you will see my own allegations of forged documents, written in June 2003. The ONLY question is, "Did Jim Bell make those allegations", NOT "Are those allegations TRUE"! (I suggest that you should have, INSTEAD of precipitately deleting the material, ASK me to cite online citations, if they exist. Why didn't you do that? Are you just so used to 'playing God' that it's 'beneath you' to ask a question or two, BEFORE throwing your lightning bolts?) As for my "global warming" discoveries: I did, indeed, sent numerous letters on the subject. Documents of this type, sent to the US Congress, Obama, NIST, and DOE, are generally considered public records. (See "Freedom of Information Act"). Verifying that I actually sent these letters, WHICH IS THE ONLY RELEVANT issue here, is easy: Put in a "FOIA" request. Even easier, I'd be happy to fax you a copy of these letters. Further, the reason that I posted SOME of the improperly-deleted content on the Talk: page is because YOU, improperly, DID NOT: You engaged in a 'drive-by edit': You did not seek or obtain consensus. You actively tried to avoid formation of that consensus. You said that I "...have received no consensus for their inclusion". Ha! In other words, you are implying that I must obtain a "consensus" for their "inclusion". In other words, that it is MY, PRIOR. burden of proof! To the contrary, my understanding is that there is NO REQUIREMENT that an editor obtain a consensus PRIOR TO posting material. So, I did not try to so. You, however, on multiple occasions were fully aware that you did not obtain consensus for their deletion, AND that I repeatedly posted the material, and you deleted the material QUICKLY in a clear attempt to prevent the community from even LEARNING of the existence of the issue. (It appears, from comments about you, that you have some 'priors' concerning this form of rude behavior: Not waiting for any sort of consensus to emerge.) Apparently, you believe that you didn't REQUIRE any sort of 'consensus' to justify the deletion, yet now you're implying that I was somehow required to obtain consensus for their INCLUSION. Further, your attempt to isolate the issue to MY article alone, fails. I have been objecting to highly inconsistent, hypocritical, biased, and malicious acts BY YOU. It is quite reasonable for me to cite the way things are ACTUALLY done, in other articles, in order to point out: 1. How you are actually NOT following, consistently, WP 'rules'. 2. How you are 'singling out' me for biased treatment. 3. Your interpretation of WP's rules is either WRONG, or is selectively malicious. For example, suppose the practice is actually to wait days, weeks, or even many months BEFORE doing a 'drive-by-delete', then THAT is the standard I feel I was, and remain, entitled to. A deletion in, say, 3 hours is obviously calculated to OBSTRUCT others from even LEARNING about the dispute!

So far, you're ignored every logical objection to your actions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by James dalton bell (talk • contribs)

copied from talk:Jim Bell

Please read these sections - WP:BLP, WP:OR, WP:RS and WP:V and it may help you understand that there are no double standards being applied here, and that BLP policies are cut and dry. ArcAngel (talk) (review) 00:34, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

You, like 'Dodo', are wrong. Notice that 'Dodo' hasn't bothered to EXPLAIN, in detail, his actions. This is quite revealing! He must know that I am a 'new' user: Only on for about two weeks. Logic suggests that he should, carefully, EXPLAIN why he did something like deleting my posts, repeatedly, without even as much as asking the community. After all, why should he be RUDE, as he has been, when he cannot claim that I 'should know' not merely what the rules say, but also the way they are followed. Well, the simple answer may be that he does this kind of thing a lot: He may ORIGINALLY have been respectful, but maybe he's developed a practice of 'drive-by-edits'. He seems to have that reputation! But as tempting as it may be to assert that, I think his actions are far more detailed and specific, and malicious: His pattern of deletion of my posts is to delete ALL ALL ALL of my posts, not merely some fraction that (he would argue) violates some rule. So, the 'rule' (actually, the practice) he seems to be showing is this: "Do not allow James Dalton Bell to post ANYTHING, on any article, and certainly not on 'jim bell'." Will 'Dodo' deny this? So far, he's avoided commenting! 'Dodo' seems to do this by simply finding SOME reason to dislike my post (even just a small part of it, though he doesn't say), and then use this to 'justify' deleting everything. The best explanation, I think, is that somebody has put him up to it, and he wasn't careful enough to cover his tracks. And, a few other non-thinkers back him up. (Is that called 'sock puppetry' or 'meat puppetry'?) James dalton bell (talk) 11:26, 3 January 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by James dalton bell (talk • contribs)

User:JehnCD

Hey Gogo Dodo - just to let you know, I changed the block settings for JehnCD (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) from a soft block to a hard block because he was clearly trying to impersonate JohnCD (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - hope that's okay with you. Ryan Postlethwaite 01:22, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:25, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Blocked another one. Plastikspork _―Œ 02:37, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:59, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Message from Brybaby

who is this:( —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brybaby (talk • contribs) 04:39, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:46, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Your wrong

What i have written is not in any way threating or abusive and is the truth richard foley will vouch for this. So what is the problem. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daisysmith (talk • contribs) 04:40, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Dude??!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daisysmith (talk • contribs) 04:44, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:51, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

>:(:(-2010-01-03T07:51:00.000Z">

why you be so mean to me CRY —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cloverulesyou (talk • contribs) 07:51, 3 January 2010 (UTC):("> :(">

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:55, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Your silence is deafening.

You're rude, malicious, abrupt, unfair, and your motives are clear as glass. That must be why you're newly silent.James dalton bell (talk) 11:38, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

help

i'd like to send you an email but not here where everyone can read it. Its in refernce to a page you deleted that was an attack on a person. Please help. whoever this person is that writes these things has made other threats on other websites and i must get to the bottom of this. Myrights2010 (talk) 01:47, 5 January 2010 (UTC)