Revision as of 22:35, 14 January 2010 editGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits →Los Atrevidos FC: Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:37, 14 January 2010 edit undoAmsaim (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers10,118 edits →Wasted Bandwidth: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 159: | Line 159: | ||
:The article was deleted because it was an obvious ]. -- ] (]) 22:35, 14 January 2010 (UTC) | :The article was deleted because it was an obvious ]. -- ] (]) 22:35, 14 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Wasted Bandwidth == | |||
The amount of bandwidth that is being wasted by the numerous editors who create one hoax article after the other is amazing and sad at the same time. :) It appears as if some school kiddies sitting in class are playing around with their smartphones. ] (]) 22:37, 14 January 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:37, 14 January 2010
Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on your talk page unless you prefer otherwise as usually noted on your talk page. If you are an editor without an account, I will reply here.
|
If you are here to ask me why I deleted your article, please read the common reasons why I have deleted your article. |
Archives | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
User:JehnCD
Hey Gogo Dodo - just to let you know, I changed the block settings for JehnCD (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) from a soft block to a hard block because he was clearly trying to impersonate JohnCD (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - hope that's okay with you. Ryan Postlethwaite 01:22, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:25, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
- Blocked another one. Plastikspork ―Œ 02:37, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:59, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Message from Brybaby
who is this:( —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brybaby (talk • contribs) 04:39, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:46, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Your wrong
What i have written is not in any way threating or abusive and is the truth richard foley will vouch for this. So what is the problem. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daisysmith (talk • contribs) 04:40, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Dude??!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daisysmith (talk • contribs) 04:44, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:51, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
>:(:(-2010-01-03T07:51:00.000Z">
why you be so mean to me CRY —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cloverulesyou (talk • contribs) 07:51, 3 January 2010 (UTC):("> :(">
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:55, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
help
i'd like to send you an email but not here where everyone can read it. Its in refernce to a page you deleted that was an attack on a person. Please help. whoever this person is that writes these things has made other threats on other websites and i must get to the bottom of this. Myrights2010 (talk) 01:47, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:51, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Why was ShieldMaster listing Deleted? Please restore
We do not understand why ShieldMaster was deleted. It is a valuable entry as it is one of the last projects in which Joe Simon was involved (Joe Simon). We would like to have the ShiledMaster listing restored. If a link to Joe Simon is required, please add.Scriptwriter2002 (talk) 16:48, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:52, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
RMQD???
y was my RMQD deleted?>?????? there where no curses and it was perfectlly fine —Preceding unsigned comment added by 1Dominicano809 (talk • contribs) 00:58, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
RE: Ron Christie
Got it. Should have double checked for other authors.
SaveThePoint (talk) 01:00, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:05, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Message from Spunkybailey
uhh hi u reported me dont do that —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spunkybailey (talk • contribs) 02:16, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
DJ Nihilist Spam
I've noticed that you have also caught a few of these they seem to be coming in from a range of 3-4 IP's hitting about 6 pages. I've done at least 3 rounds of reverts in the last 24 hours. I searched for DJ Nihilist and got less then 100 hits on google all garbage. Ridernyc (talk) 07:13, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:20, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Just had to rollback 10 articles. This time he also blanked a large section of one article. Ridernyc (talk) 09:04, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:04, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Just had to rollback 10 articles. This time he also blanked a large section of one article. Ridernyc (talk) 09:04, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Thank you
Thanks for blocking the vandal who kept defacing my user page. A plate of cookies for you!
GLaDOS (talk) 23:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- No problem. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:52, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
I hope you don't mind
but I updated your user page. ThemFromSpace 01:47, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- No problem. Thank you. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Message from Medusa1122
The point is valid. They aren't notable enough. And things that aren't notable enough, that don't meet the criteria, shouldn't be on the site. Simple as that, or so you would have me believe. Medusa1122 (talk) 00:50, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks
for reverting this vandalism which impersonated another editor. Keep up the good work. Hallucegenia (talk) 08:57, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
- and on mine too! Leaky Caldron 20:39, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
No problem. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:34, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks
For this. I was told that if you welcome vandals, they will reform their ways...guess not this one. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 06:19, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:29, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Perry Jones/ Kyle Prater
Both articles have been put up for deletion. The person says thay aren't notable because they haven't played on a professional level, but there are lots of non professional athlete pages. I dont see what is wrong with them. They have sources/refs that talk about them. Ice (talk) 22:28, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:07, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Please Remove It Completely.
Hi :) I pleadfully ask you completely remove my deleted "Europe Family Sweden" page entirely. I do not want it to be 'cached', I want it removed completely. Please, I ask this be done as soon as possible as I do not want or need it anymore, and feel uncomfortable with it online now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gghh1122 (talk • contribs) 04:38, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:10, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for the response.
I appreciate the acknowledgement. I hope I was not pressuring. Thank you. I understand and I will be patient. Goodbye :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gghh1122 (talk • contribs) 08:19, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:24, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Question?
I was just wondering when the approxiamate time of the complete deletion of my "Europe Family Sweden" is? Any estimate? Please reply quick since I have to go soon, thank you and goodbye. :) Gghh1122 (talk) 15:50, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:44, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
User:Victor galindez
Hi. I am sorry you feel that I was condescending to the above editor. That was not my intention. The quality of the articles he created (Blanca Sanchez, Mario Iván Martínez) was such that I was compelled to contact him and advise him to desist from creating articles until he had learned how to do so properly. I suppose I employed stronger language than User:Minimac94, the editor who welcomed him to Misplaced Pages, who had issued similar advice. I apologize if my language was too strong and I came off as condescending. I assure you that, to the best of my knowledge, that has never been a criticism levelled at me. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 12:23, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
A problem with the baptist article
The baptist article fails to be a neutral page in that it calls baptists a "Protestant" church. In doing so wikipedia is giving sole credence to the common yet mistaken belief that baptists came out of the catholic church. Even if they don't agree with the view that baptists precede Catholics, they should at least remove the word Protestant and thusly leave the article totally neutral. Most of the rest of the article does well with demonstrating wikipedia's stand on remaining a neutral site, but the beginning of the article is disapointing at best. Jakestang (talk) 00:35, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:38, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Stay Away From Me!
please leave me alone!!! stop it!!! stay away from me! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.84.236.206 (talk) 04:27, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
- Please review Misplaced Pages's guideline for musicians for inclusion on Misplaced Pages and the guideline for writing an autobiography. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:41, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Message from Twonkomadness
so it doesn't make any difference if he's a school mate? guess i'll just have to make a youtube video about him, then eh? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Twonkomadness (talk • contribs) 19:22, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:28, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Los Atrevidos
Why have you deleted it? You sturdily built cup? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Losatrevidos (talk • contribs) 22:27, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:33, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Los Atrevidos FC
Hello Gogo Dodo, i was distraught to learn that you have deleted a part of my heritage - the Los Atrevidos FC page. Please could you explain to me your reasons for this? Kind Regards x —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.201.152.84 (talk) 22:33, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
- The article was deleted because it was an obvious hoax article. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:35, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Wasted Bandwidth
The amount of bandwidth that is being wasted by the numerous editors who create one hoax article after the other is amazing and sad at the same time. :) It appears as if some school kiddies sitting in class are playing around with their smartphones. Amsaim (talk) 22:37, 14 January 2010 (UTC)