| Revision as of 16:22, 16 January 2010 view sourceMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 7d) to User talk:Russavia/Archive 15.← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:48, 18 January 2010 view source Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators87,183 edits →Topic ban partly lifted: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
| Hello Russavia. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of ], a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''A7 does not apply to software.''' Thank you. — ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 06:28, 16 January 2010 (UTC) | Hello Russavia. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of ], a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''A7 does not apply to software.''' Thank you. — ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 06:28, 16 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == Topic ban partly lifted == | |||
| ]. Lots of them.]] | |||
| Since nobody has yet officially notified you, I'll do it here, even though you've probably seen it already anyway: As per , your appeal to have your current topic ban lifted in parts has been granted. You are now allowed to include Russia-related topics in your edits relating to "aviation and diplomacy topics". As you understand, the topic ban remains in force on other topic areas, in particular anything potentially controversial about political disputes and ethnic history. It was generally noted that your appeal expressed a positive and mature attitude to the situation, and that you should be welcome to make constructive contributions in your area of expertise. | |||
| At the same time, it is my duty to ] you for messing around with asterisks. | |||
| Best of luck, -- ] ] 13:48, 18 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:48, 18 January 2010
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
| ПРЕВЕД! |
| Welcome to my talk page. Please leave me a message, alternatively you are welcome to email me. If you leave a message here for me and it requires a reply, I will reply here, so you may want to add my talk page to your watchlist. All users have my permission to remove any bot messages from my talk page at any time. |
|---|
 Archives |
|
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
notes to self - nothing to see here
Thank you for the unblock
As per this User:Jehochman has now unblocked me and I am able to participate in the project, whilst recognising that the topic ban handed down by Sandstein remains. Thank you Jehochman. I am an editor who is capable of collaborative editing, and as evidenced by NVO's comments above, political affiliation and the like can not and should not matter here on this project, as our own opinions are not important. We are here to help build an encyclopaedia, not to engage in advocacy and the like. This is how editors such as myself and NVO are able to get along so well, even though our own personal views do not align completely. Misplaced Pages needn't be a battleground, and it shouldn't be that way.
I will for the time being work on other things, such as getting Druk Air (an article I completely wrote) up to WP:GA standard, and then take to WP:FA review in the near future. If the issue of my topic ban is not addressed at the current Arb, this can be addressed at a later stage sometime in the near future.
Thank you to those admins who supported my unblocking, and to those who opposed it, I am sure that my future editing will show that the perceptions of myself only being a disruptive editor are misconceived. And perhaps together we can all work together in order to get rid of the battleground on WP, or at least try our best to. --Russavia (leaving undated/unstamped so as not to have this auto archived)
The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 11 January 2010
- From the editor: Call for writers
- 2009 in review: 2009 in Review
- Books: New Book namespace created
- News and notes: Wikimania 2011, Flaggedrevs, Global sysops and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
DYK for Lina Congo
|
On January 13, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lina Congo, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Wikiproject: Did you know? 12:00, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Air Zaïre
|
|
On January 14, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Air Zaïre, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist (talk) 06:00, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
DYKs
Ah, indeed. Thanks!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 17:09, January 14, 2010 (UTC)
Regarding Air Guinee
Good day, I notice you contributed to this article here: , yet you have "censored" or "starred out" references to the Soviet Union, and all the makes of the planes. Other editors have changed the Soviet Union usages, but we do not know what should fill in the blanks for the planes. Can you help?
Thanks in advance, --Taelus (talk) 10:58, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- Russavia, I'm at a loss to understand why you did this as you are aware that Misplaced Pages is not censored. The issue has been raised at WP:ANI. An explanation would be apprectiated. Mjroots (talk) 11:18, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Jane's F-15
Hello Russavia. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Jane's F-15, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to software. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 06:28, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Topic ban partly lifted
Since nobody has yet officially notified you, I'll do it here, even though you've probably seen it already anyway: As per this, your appeal to have your current topic ban lifted in parts has been granted. You are now allowed to include Russia-related topics in your edits relating to "aviation and diplomacy topics". As you understand, the topic ban remains in force on other topic areas, in particular anything potentially controversial about political disputes and ethnic history. It was generally noted that your appeal expressed a positive and mature attitude to the situation, and that you should be welcome to make constructive contributions in your area of expertise.
At the same time, it is my duty to trout-slap you for messing around with asterisks.
Best of luck, -- Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:48, 18 January 2010 (UTC)