| Revision as of 23:00, 14 January 2010 editRapido (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,154 edits →Neutral← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:10, 18 January 2010 edit undo94.193.135.142 (talk) →NeutralNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| :You keep giving me these warnings, but I am well-aware of Misplaced Pages's policies, and looking through your history, you seem to be engaged in edit-wars constantly. The sources I included were from very ] academic journals and publishers, so they are not my personal analysis. You should do some more background. Regards, -- ] (]) 22:52, 14 January 2010 (UTC) | :You keep giving me these warnings, but I am well-aware of Misplaced Pages's policies, and looking through your history, you seem to be engaged in edit-wars constantly. The sources I included were from very ] academic journals and publishers, so they are not my personal analysis. You should do some more background. Regards, -- ] (]) 22:52, 14 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
| ::'''Comment''' - I would be interested to hear how those sources have anything to do with ]; you may say they are relevent, but unless you have a source that has anything to do with BBC Persian Television that talks about the Bahai/British connection as well, then it's ] - perhaps you should take a look at this, specifically ]. And I do not appreciate your assumption of bad faith (talking about non-existent "engag in edit-wars constantly"), and would request you refrain from doing so in future. ] (]) 23:00, 14 January 2010 (UTC) | ::'''Comment''' - I would be interested to hear how those sources have anything to do with ]; you may say they are relevent, but unless you have a source that has anything to do with BBC Persian Television that talks about the Bahai/British connection as well, then it's ] - perhaps you should take a look at this, specifically ]. And I do not appreciate your assumption of bad faith (talking about non-existent "engag in edit-wars constantly"), and would request you refrain from doing so in future. ] (]) 23:00, 14 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
| ==BBC Persian== | |||
| Information.svg Welcome to Misplaced Pages, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Misplaced Pages is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view and do not add speculative information as facts. A contribution you made to BBC Persian Television appears to carry a non-neutral point of view and you attempted to portray an speculation as fact, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Rapido (talk) 22:45, 14 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:10, 18 January 2010
Neutral
Exactly, if you want neutrality, you can't just take any random statement by the IRI and put it into an article without giving it context. That's what is neutrality. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 22:47, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
- You keep giving me these warnings, but I am well-aware of Misplaced Pages's policies, and looking through your history, you seem to be engaged in edit-wars constantly. The sources I included were from very WP:reliable academic journals and publishers, so they are not my personal analysis. You should do some more background. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 22:52, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - I would be interested to hear how those sources have anything to do with BBC Persian Television; you may say they are relevent, but unless you have a source that has anything to do with BBC Persian Television that talks about the Bahai/British connection as well, then it's WP:OR - perhaps you should take a look at this, specifically WP:SYN. And I do not appreciate your assumption of bad faith (talking about non-existent "engag in edit-wars constantly"), and would request you refrain from doing so in future. Rapido (talk) 23:00, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
BBC Persian
Information.svg Welcome to Misplaced Pages, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Misplaced Pages is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view and do not add speculative information as facts. A contribution you made to BBC Persian Television appears to carry a non-neutral point of view and you attempted to portray an speculation as fact, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Rapido (talk) 22:45, 14 January 2010 (UTC)