Revision as of 04:13, 24 January 2010 editHbdragon88 (talk | contribs)Administrators22,808 edits →Nick Adenhart: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:01, 24 January 2010 edit undoGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits →Nick Adenhart: ReplyNext edit → | ||
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
Looks like the crop of the image might be deleted because it's an image of a board that's also copyrighted. Upload here and go for the fair use rationale? I liked ] better as that's an iamge of him in action. ] (]) 04:13, 24 January 2010 (UTC) | Looks like the crop of the image might be deleted because it's an image of a board that's also copyrighted. Upload here and go for the fair use rationale? I liked ] better as that's an iamge of him in action. ] (]) 04:13, 24 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Re : I noticed that you have been editing the article over the past few days. Getting it to GA/FA status would be great. I don't follow either process (I'm admittedly not much of an article writer), but I'd be happy to do anything that will help out. -- ] (]) 20:01, 24 January 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:01, 24 January 2010
To those leaving messages: Try to keep them brief and to the point. Posts that are too lengthy may not get a timely response. Thank you. To those leaving RfA thankspam: Consider yourself welcomed. I appreciate the thought, but they tend to take up a lot of my page and archives, and I really don't need them for anything. Wizardman
DYK for Tavo Alvarez
The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 18 January 2010
Birthday
South Bay (talk) 05:41, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
-- Lady Rose (talk • contrib) 21:47, 20 January 2010 (UTC) Involvement?Since you've deleted several PRODs of unsourced BLPs within hours of their being tagged, don't you think there's at least the appearance of being involved in the current shitstorm? Guettarda (talk) 03:38, 21 January 2010 (UTC) Wasn't saying you had taken one side or the other, just that there was an appearance of involvement. Guettarda (talk) 03:51, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
1976 Buccaneers seasonI saw where you reviewed my 1976 GAN; unfortunately, I didn't know about it at the time. I have gone back and edited it per your suggestions. I don't know whether you wind up being the person who reviews it next time, but I do want to thank you for taking the time to look at it and to make comments on it. GuySperanza (talk) 20:42, 21 January 2010 (UTC) Thanks!Thanks for the Darvin Moon review! — Hunter Kahn 22:43, 23 January 2010 (UTC) Ulysses S. Grant articleI made many edits, got facts straight, and removed unneccessary segments. Is there anything I missed or could change? I tried to make the Civil War segment more critical of Grant's leadership and military strategies. {Cmguy777 (talk) 03:39, 21 January 2010 (UTC)} Nick AdenhartLooks like the crop of the image might be deleted because it's an image of a board that's also copyrighted. Upload here and go for the fair use rationale? I liked file:NickAdenhart.jpg better as that's an iamge of him in action. hbdragon88 (talk) 04:13, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
|