Misplaced Pages

User talk:QuackGuru: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:48, 24 January 2010 editQuackGuru (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users79,978 edits Undid revision 339750477 by Looie496 (talk← Previous edit Revision as of 18:28, 26 January 2010 edit undoQuackGuru (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users79,978 edits Note: Very interesting or odd coincidence?Next edit →
Line 39: Line 39:


* . * .

== Note: Very interesting or odd coincidence? ==

http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Onorem Stopped editing at 17:23, 26 January 2010.

http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Rvcx Started editing at 17:28, 26 January 2010.

Rvcx has not edited Wikpedia in over one a week and shows up in to respond to my comment. Both accounts have the same tone of language on the talk page and support each other. ] (]) 18:28, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:28, 26 January 2010

Sandbox notes

  • According to who? The 2008 book Trick or Treatment states... is sourced but alleged is not. It was original research to put words in the cited source's mouth.
  • Many chiropractors have sought to address their minor status within the U.S. medical community by attending practice-building seminars to assist chiropractors to persuade their patients of the efficacy of their treatments, increase their revenue, and boost their morale as unorthodox medical practitioners.
  • Chiropractic#Safety. The 2008 book Trick or Treatment states "chiropractors may X-ray the same patient several times a year, even though there is no clear evidence that X-rays will help the therapist treat the patient. X-rays can reveal neither the subluxations nor the innate intelligence associated with chiropractic philosophy, because they do not exist. There is no conceivable reason at all why X-raying the spine should help a straight chiropractor treat an ear infection, asthma or period pains. most worrying of all, chiropractors generally require a full spine X-ray, which delivers a significant higher radiation dose than most other X-ray procedures".
  • Quackery is more prevalent in chiropractic than in other health care professions which is a violation of the social contract between patients and physicians.
  • Chiropractic has been controversial, though to a lesser extent than in past years, and continues to be more controversial than indigenous medicine. Many people believe chiropractic had little more than a placebo effect but there has always been satisfied patients.
  • cautionary article about chiropractic therapies
  • Historical criticism and controversy elements
  • The editor was warned about the probation but has decided to delete properly sourced text here and here after returning from a wikibreak. The editor has a possible WP:COI.

Note: Very interesting or odd coincidence?

http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Onorem Stopped editing at 17:23, 26 January 2010.

http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Rvcx Started editing at 17:28, 26 January 2010.

Rvcx has not edited Wikpedia in over one a week and shows up in under 10 minutes to respond to my comment. Both accounts have the same tone of language on the talk page and support each other. QuackGuru (talk) 18:28, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

  1. Cite error: The named reference Homola was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  2. Cite error: The named reference DeVocht was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  3. Baer HA (1996). "Practice-building seminars in chiropractic: a petit bourgeois response to biomedical domination". Med Anthropol Q. 10 (1): 29–44. PMID 8689442.
  4. Cite error: The named reference Murphy-pod was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  5. DeVocht JW (2006). "History and overview of theories and methods of chiropractic: a counterpoint". Clin Orthop Relat Res. 444: 243–9. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000203460.89887.8d. PMID 16523145.