| Revision as of 04:01, 5 February 2010 editHalfShadow (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers34,876 edits →Ozzy Osbourne's 10th studio album: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:08, 5 February 2010 edit undoExtransit (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,062 edits →Ozzy Osbourne's 10th studio album: reNext edit → | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
| Maybe salt it until there's actual proof it's coming? That's at least the third time it's been created. ]] 04:01, 5 February 2010 (UTC) | Maybe salt it until there's actual proof it's coming? That's at least the third time it's been created. ]] 04:01, 5 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| :I think I will hold off on that for now. Two of the deletion log entries just came from moving the page around and as the title has many possible alternatives I think the likelihood of recreation is relatively small. ] (]) 04:08, 5 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:08, 5 February 2010
Community de-Adminship - finalization poll for the CDA proposal
After tolling up the votes in the revision proposals, it emerged that 5.4 had the most support, but elements of that support remained unclear, and various comments throughout the polls needed consideration.
A finalisation poll (intended, if possible, to be one last poll before finalising the CDA proposal) has been run to;
- gather opinion on the 'consensus margin' (what percentages, if any, have the most support) and
- ascertain whether there is support for a 'two-phase' poll at the eventual RfC (not far off now), where CDA will finally be put to the community. Matt Lewis (talk) 01:03, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
172.129.120.152's block.
You may want to set it with talk page editing disabled..I've dealt with this vandal a number of times, he always rephrases/vandalises his own talk. Connormah (talk) 03:23, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
- You are quite correct Connormah. I was kind of amused by it, that's why I have not so far. But, that's a pretty illegitimate excuse on my part, I know :D. Re-blocking now...
- Keep up the good vandal fighting work sir. Icewedge (talk) 03:30, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
You've got mail. The Thing Vandalize me 03:38, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- So I see. Its good to get mail :D. Expect a response shortly. Icewedge (talk) 02:09, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/JWASM
At 175 kilobytes, should Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/JWASM be included in User:Icewedge/Largest AFD's? Cunard (talk) 22:58, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Probably, I think the idea I had when I created the page was to list AFDs more than 150 kilobytes. Thanks for the spot! Icewedge (talk) 03:16, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- No problem! I found out about this interesting list after you added Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Colorado balloon incident to it. Best, Cunard (talk) 03:19, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Ozzy Osbourne's 10th studio album
Maybe salt it until there's actual proof it's coming? That's at least the third time it's been created. HalfShadow 04:01, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- I think I will hold off on that for now. Two of the deletion log entries just came from moving the page around and as the title has many possible alternatives I think the likelihood of recreation is relatively small. Icewedge (talk) 04:08, 5 February 2010 (UTC)