Revision as of 21:21, 5 February 2010 editGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits Thread comment, reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:42, 5 February 2010 edit undoJamieS93 (talk | contribs)17,561 edits →Adriano Espaillat -- AGAIN: cmtNext edit → | ||
Line 135: | Line 135: | ||
:I don't think that is necessary just yet. The editor in question has been blocked for edit warring. If another editor appears, then semi-protection may be necessary (see ]). -- ] (]) 21:21, 5 February 2010 (UTC) | :I don't think that is necessary just yet. The editor in question has been blocked for edit warring. If another editor appears, then semi-protection may be necessary (see ]). -- ] (]) 21:21, 5 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
::I was away for a bit - thanks so much, Gogo Dodo, for not only handling the user, but taking care of the BLP problem. ]''']''' 21:42, 5 February 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:42, 5 February 2010
Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on your talk page unless you prefer otherwise as usually noted on your talk page. If you are an editor without an account, I will reply here.
|
If you are here to ask me why I deleted your article, please read the common reasons why I have deleted your article. |
Archives | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CashedKingdom Records
Would you mind explaining the reason for which you deleted the CashedKingdom Records wiki page? I'm not quite sure that I understand why it was removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.255.210.52 (talk) 23:11, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- The article was deleted because it did not establish why the company was notable enough for inclusion per the notability guidelines for companies. See the notability guidelines for musical artists, too. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:32, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Socks
Part of User:HoaryHambone's unblock request was a link to User:Zany Zebu Redivivus, which indicates multiple socks. Should this be consolidated somehow, or will that just inflame the situation? (See also: Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/Krazy Komodo. Apparently this has been going on for some time. Steamroller Assault (talk) 01:28, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:35, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Deleting others' comments from Editor Review
I'm wondering if I should remove a comment from User:Nothughthomas from WP:Editor review/antiuser. The user is trying to discredit me because of their objection to this incident report I started about them last night. I don't want someone to stumble upon their comment on my ER and take it as true, not knowing this user's history of disruption, but at the same time I feel that I can't directly comment on there without breaking WP:NOTTHEM (even if this isn't an unblock request) or fueling the drama. What do you think is the best course of action? Just leave it alone? Thanks for your time, XXX antiuser 19:56, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:49, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Bclrocks10
I'm not sure what to do about this. I have tried warning this user several times, and when I did get a response it was laced with some combative language. I think he/she must have some sort of "net nanny" filter on his/her computer which tries to delete all offensive words or something. In any event, the end result is vandalism. Plastikspork ―Œ 21:04, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:46, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Happy Gogo Dodo's Day!
User:Gogo Dodo has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, Peace, A record of your Day will always be kept here. |
For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:14, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Please reactivate account
Dear Gogo Dodo, I am requesting you that, please reactivate my following account which you have blocked. Account Name : AmenderTechnologies
And please restore my user page, that was you deleted. I will edit the article by using guidelines. After that I will close this Mictesting123 account permanently & I will use AmenderTechnologies account. Please Please Please ...It's a request.
Thanks in advance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mictesting123 (talk • contribs) 07:57, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:33, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your kind & quick reply
Dear Gogo Dodo,
I know this is user violation because of my account : AmenderTechnologies. But I am requesting you that please release that account & block my this Mictesting123 account. So that I will use only one account & that is : AmenderTechnologies. So after that it wouldn't called as user violation because of Mictesting123 will be blocked. You please keep my only one account in use, that is AmenderTechnologies & block Mictesting123. I give you word that I will not use this Mictesting123 account after that. AmenderTechnologies account is very important for me. Please do the needful. Mictesting123 (talk) 19:03, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:07, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Restoration of page
Dear Gogo Dodo,
Ok it's fine. Do not release my AmenderTechnologies account, but can you restore that deleted page from AmenderTechnologies account to my Mictesting123 acoount on my user page section ??? That page is very important & I have been taken efforts to create it.....please. Mictesting123 (talk) 19:29, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:38, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
I know that but I deleted that page from user page section of my Mictesting123 account and copied that page in user page section of AmenderTechnologies account. And after that you deleted that page from user page section of AmenderTechnologies account. So right now I haven't that page. Please restore that page in Mictesting123 account.
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:47, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
The Game
What was wrong with the page? I wasn't finished editing it yet, and it was far from a finised project. What can I do to improve the quality? Jingle38 (talk) 19:17, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:22, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Max Leger
WHY DID YOU DELETE MY PAGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Max Leger (talk • contribs) 02:48, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:36, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
User talk:Once upon a time in a far away land
Hey, just so you know, this looks like just another new user who has been biten, badly. Why don't you look in his contribs? I have already asked the blocking admin why he did, but he hasn't answered yet. Honestly, stop biting the newcomers. How will Misplaced Pages survive if you infa-block every new users that joins? Ajraddatz (Talk) 04:50, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:53, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Alright, I guess so. Even though he actually only made two bad edits, and was only warned twice and then blocked for a non-trolling edit... oh well. Ajraddatz (Talk) 04:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, I think he is a sock, an IP has just randomly come and supported him on his talk page, so you may want to just keep him blocked... Ajraddatz (Talk) 05:22, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Adriano Espaillat
Dear Gogo Dodo,
Thank you for your reversion of the article Adriano Espaillat.
This article has been VANDALIZED and PAGE BLANKED several times over the past 24 hours.
Even after being restored by an Administrator, the page was BLANKED within a matter of minutes.
Some protection for this page may be appropriate.
Thank you again for your help.
Regards,
69.203.119.66 (talk) 21:12, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Adriano Espaillat -- AGAIN
Dear Gogo Dodo,
As you can see, your own restoration of Adriano Espaillat was just PAGE BLANKED.
I believe this article needs some page protection.
Thank you,
69.203.119.66 (talk) 21:16, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- I don't think that is necessary just yet. The editor in question has been blocked for edit warring. If another editor appears, then semi-protection may be necessary (see WP:RFPP). -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:21, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- I was away for a bit - thanks so much, Gogo Dodo, for not only handling the user, but taking care of the BLP problem. JamieS93 21:42, 5 February 2010 (UTC)