| Revision as of 00:14, 4 February 2010 editFastily (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled100,543 edits →Autoreviewer: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:49, 6 February 2010 edit undoTony Sidaway (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers81,722 edits →[]: {{subst:uw-probation|Climatic Research Unit hacking incident|Misplaced Pages:General sanctions/Climate change probation}} -- ~~~~Next edit → | ||
| Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| Hi, just wanted to let you know that I have autoreviewer rights on your account, as you have created numerous valid articles. This will have little or no effect on your editing, and is intended mainly to reduce the workload on ]. For more information see ], and feel free to ask if you have any questions. ''']''' <sup><small>]</small></sup></span> 00:14, 4 February 2010 (UTC) | Hi, just wanted to let you know that I have autoreviewer rights on your account, as you have created numerous valid articles. This will have little or no effect on your editing, and is intended mainly to reduce the workload on ]. For more information see ], and feel free to ask if you have any questions. ''']''' <sup><small>]</small></sup></span> 00:14, 4 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| ==]== | |||
| ] Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed{{#if:Climatic Research Unit hacking incident|, ],}} is on ]. {{#if:Misplaced Pages:General sanctions/Climate change probation|A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at ].|}} {{#if:|{{{3}}}|Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.<br><br>''The above is a ]. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you.''}}<!-- Template:uw-probation --> -- ] 13:49, 6 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:49, 6 February 2010
Status: Offline 
| This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nsaa. |
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
 |
|
 | This user has asked for Wikipedians to give him feedback at an editor review. You may comment on his edits at Misplaced Pages:Editor review/Nsaa. |
 Archives |
RfD nomination of Glaciergate
I have nominated Glaciergate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Scjessey (talk) 15:47, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
RfD nomination of Amazongate
I have nominated Amazongate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Scjessey (talk) 15:55, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
RfD nomination of Pachaurigate
I have nominated Pachaurigate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Scjessey (talk) 15:56, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
My talk page
You're welomce to raise an issue with me on my talk page. Once.
Once I've said "drop this dead donkey" that should be a hint that you don't need to say exactly the same thing yet again William M. Connolley (talk) 15:35, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- You are misusing your talk page by removing parts of the discussion. Reading Misplaced Pages:Talk_page_guidelines could be wise. I've just stated that for the record. Nsaa (talk) 15:41, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- To which guideline do you refer, Nsaa? Presumably you have looked at Misplaced Pages:Talk page guidelines#User talk pages and Misplaced Pages:Don't restore removed comments. . dave souza, talk 16:10, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- Yes "Users should not remove only portions of another user's comment, nor edit their comment in any other way." Misplaced Pages:Don't restore removed comments. Nsaa (talk) 16:14, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- "Users should not remove only portions of another user's comment" Yes but you can remove the lot. "nor edit their comment in any other way" as in don`t chop it up. There is no prohibition to removing comments from your own talk page, else people could post abuse and it would be there forever :) --mark nutley (talk) 16:20, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, mark nutley, you beat me to it. The diffs show whole posts being removed, which is ok. . . dave souza, talk 16:24, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- "Users should not remove only portions of another user's comment" Yes but you can remove the lot. "nor edit their comment in any other way" as in don`t chop it up. There is no prohibition to removing comments from your own talk page, else people could post abuse and it would be there forever :) --mark nutley (talk) 16:20, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- (e.c.)I don't disagree. As I stated I think his behavior is bad "Why do you just remove parts of an ongoing discussion? Bad bad bad, but since it's you page I can't say much. Nsaa (talk) 14:57, 1 February 2010 (UTC)"]. I've not claimed that he has broken any formal rule. Nsaa (talk) 16:26, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- Nsaa, could you please use the edit summarys, else i see this I don't disagree. As I stated I think his behavior is bad
- Thanks, just lasy and pasted in my comment. Nsaa (talk) 16:38, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- Nsaa, could you please use the edit summarys, else i see this I don't disagree. As I stated I think his behavior is bad
- (e.c.)I don't disagree. As I stated I think his behavior is bad "Why do you just remove parts of an ongoing discussion? Bad bad bad, but since it's you page I can't say much. Nsaa (talk) 14:57, 1 February 2010 (UTC)"]. I've not claimed that he has broken any formal rule. Nsaa (talk) 16:26, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
You are misusing your talk page by removing - no. I reject your assertion. If you think otherwise, and care to pursue it, find yourself an admin. Don't bother me about your incorrect interpretations of policy any more William M. Connolley (talk) 17:37, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Please comment on the content, not the contributor
I redacted part of your comment here. Please remember to comment on the content, not the contributor. - 2/0 (cont.) 16:56, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
E-mail-theft-gate listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect E-mail-theft-gate. Since you had some involvement with the E-mail-theft-gate redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). 147.70.242.54 (talk) 03:14, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 1 February 2010
- From the editor: Writers wanted to cover strategy, public policy
- Strategic planning: The challenges of strategic planning in a volunteer community
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Dinosaurs
- Sister projects: Sister project roundup
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Autoreviewer
Hi, just wanted to let you know that I have granted autoreviewer rights on your account, as you have created numerous valid articles. This will have little or no effect on your editing, and is intended mainly to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information see Misplaced Pages:Autoreviewer, and feel free to ask if you have any questions. FASTILY 00:14, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Climatic Research Unit hacking incident
Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Climatic Research Unit hacking incident, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Misplaced Pages:General sanctions/Climate change probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.
The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. -- TS 13:49, 6 February 2010 (UTC)