| Revision as of 23:07, 5 February 2010 editTarc (talk | contribs)24,217 edits Undid revision 342166906 by ChildofMidnight (talk) - the perpetrator does not get to troll the talk pages of others← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:13, 6 February 2010 edit undoTony Sidaway (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers81,722 edits →[]: {{subst:uw-probation|Climatic Research Unit hacking incident|Misplaced Pages:General sanctions/Climate change probation}} -- ~~~~Next edit → | ||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
| You are looking at it from a too confrontational view. All I'm saying is that the reference used to justify Christianity is a horrible reference. It has errors, even forgets that his occupation is lawyer. It is not a primary source. It is just some wacko writing a website. They are not a primary or secondary source. They are a tertiary source, like Misplaced Pages is. ] (]) 05:08, 5 February 2010 (UTC) | You are looking at it from a too confrontational view. All I'm saying is that the reference used to justify Christianity is a horrible reference. It has errors, even forgets that his occupation is lawyer. It is not a primary source. It is just some wacko writing a website. They are not a primary or secondary source. They are a tertiary source, like Misplaced Pages is. ] (]) 05:08, 5 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| :You have a beef with the religious description, frustration that the discussion isn't going your way, so you are now taking potshots at other parts of the article in retaliation. ] (]) 14:00, 5 February 2010 (UTC) | :You have a beef with the religious description, frustration that the discussion isn't going your way, so you are now taking potshots at other parts of the article in retaliation. ] (]) 14:00, 5 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| ==]== | |||
| ] Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed{{#if:Climatic Research Unit hacking incident|, ],}} is on ]. {{#if:Misplaced Pages:General sanctions/Climate change probation|A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at ].|}} {{#if:|{{{3}}}|Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.<br><br>''The above is a ]. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you.''}}<!-- Template:uw-probation --> -- ] 20:13, 6 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:13, 6 February 2010
Documented
COMMENT: That is my statement. The form is part of the statement. The (improper) removals are also part of the statement.
(No reply necessary, but undoing your revert would be wise.)
-- Proofreader77 20:54, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Your statement is garbage, to put it mildly, adding nothing of value to the RfC. If you want to crack jokes and do the funny-boy-in-the-back-of-the-classroom shtick, go find another venue. I do not plan to edit-war over it, which is why I brought the matter up on the talk page to let others weight in, but nor will I revert my own edit either. Tarc (talk) 21:55, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
New ANI created.
I believe I should give you a heads-up on this ANI regarding Proofreader77 http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Proofreader77_Established_record_of_continuous_unrelenting_Disruptive_Editing
- --Tombaker321 (talk) 09:39, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
- This guy is just a walking punchline, and a bad one at that. Let's hope for a ban soon. Tarc (talk) 14:46, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Motion
This guy probably needs his own RFC/U, if he doesn't already have one. It's one thing to be a bit contrary, but this dude owns the word. I can't tell you how much I wish that restriction wasn't there so I could "let fly" (as Maximus would say). -- Scjessey (talk) 02:55, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- As I said before, you aren't nearly as witty as you think you are. If you had an actual opinion to share, you were fully capable of doing so without falling back on rhetorical diarrhea. Tarc (talk) 03:11, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
January 10, 2010
Are you and your buddies afraid of publishing fair and unbiased history? tuco_bad 14:38, 29 January 2010 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cgersten (talk • contribs)
Er, autoblocked?
|
Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):
Request handled by: jpgordon Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request. |
This "Dylan" account creation/blocking has nothing to do with me, but is apparently someone on the same IP that I sometimes edit from as well. (workplace). Tarc (talk) 17:04, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. Tarc (talk) 17:37, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
not an ultimatum
You are looking at it from a too confrontational view. All I'm saying is that the reference used to justify Christianity is a horrible reference. It has errors, even forgets that his occupation is lawyer. It is not a primary source. It is just some wacko writing a website. They are not a primary or secondary source. They are a tertiary source, like Misplaced Pages is. JB50000 (talk) 05:08, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- You have a beef with the religious description, frustration that the discussion isn't going your way, so you are now taking potshots at other parts of the article in retaliation. Tarc (talk) 14:00, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Climatic Research Unit hacking incident
Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Climatic Research Unit hacking incident, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Misplaced Pages:General sanctions/Climate change probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.
The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. -- TS 20:13, 6 February 2010 (UTC)