| Revision as of 05:03, 7 January 2006 editTimecop (talk | contribs)1,246 editsm →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:20, 8 January 2006 edit undoCurps (talk | contribs)52,628 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| * '''Delete''' - Vanity --] 11:47, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | * '''Delete''' - Vanity --] 11:47, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Delete'''. God bless ]'s anti-bloggery page. ]<small> ] ]</small> 13:59, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | * '''Delete'''. God bless ]'s anti-bloggery page. ]<small> ] ]</small> 13:59, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' non-notable. ] |
*'''Delete''' non-notable. ] | ||
| *'''Keep'''. The claim of only "five Google hits" is silly and obviously untrue (probably meant as an exaggeration not to be taken literally). If the Google search is refined to "The Inalienable Right"+"blog" for instance, you can see there are a few thousand hits; similarly you can search "linkdomain:federalistjournal.com" from Yahoo. References to the blog in the search output are relatively easily spotted by all three words being capitalized. There are a large number of links from other right-wing bloggers such as Michelle Malkin and Rathergate (not linked from the blogroll, but linked from within individual blog entries). The characterization of this page as self-promotion also seems inaccurate, it appears to be a straightforward description of the blog. We don't delete webpages on political grounds just because of their right-wing politics; although this is not an "A-list" blog it certainly appears to meet the minimum notability threshold. -- ] 01:20, 8 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' Notable? I think not. ] 19:09, 5 January 2006 (UTC) <small>User had 3 edits before this recent blizzard of podcasting/blog "delete" votes</small> | |||
| * '''Comment''' Nearly all of the above voters appear to be GNAA members or meatpuppets responding to Timecop's "war on blogs", who don't seem to do much on Misplaced Pages other than "warring on blogs" and engaging in minor pranks or vandalism (for instance, ] adding ]'s name to the ] ). Closing admin please take note. -- ] 01:20, 8 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' nn blogcrap. ] 19:57, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''', as non-notable vanity. ] 22:04, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| * '''Delete''' as Hosterweis says, this is precisely the kind of thing Misplaced Pages could do with massively less of. ] <sup>]]</sup>/<sub>]]</sub> ] '']'' 22:10, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' although I'm sure the US Constitiution never uses ''un''alienable. It's ''in''alienable. This is blatant non-notable advertising. ] 22:43, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| **'''Comment''' The ] doesn't use it at all, believe it or not. It's in the ] though, where it '''really''' is "''un''alienable". You're right it ought to be "]", but it isn't. ] <sup>(]/])</sup> 01:20, 6 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| * '''Delete''' per nom. ] 02:35, 6 January 2006 (UTC) <small>User's only edits are to this recent blizzard of podcasting/blog "delete" votes and his/her talk page</small> | |||
| * '''Delete''' as ]. {{alexa rank|www.federalistjournal.com/fedblog/|2,470,548}}. <span class="user-sig user-Quarl"><i>—] <sup>(])</sup> <small>] 07:39]</small></i></span> | |||
| *'''Keep'''. The article fits the category as well as the other articles in the category. To be consistent, you'd need to delete all of them or none. Simple fairness demands basic consistency. ] 22:01, 6 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : We're workign on it. Please point out any "other articles in this category" which need to be deleted either ] or ]. --] 05:03, 7 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:20, 8 January 2006
The Unalienable Right
Blogger self-promotion (the kind of thing Misplaced Pages could use less of); 124k Google hits, with about five that actually relate to aforementioned blog (Google test doesn't work here; the words are kind of in the Constitution Declaration of Independence) Hosterweis 06:55, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Vanity, blogcruft. Incognito 06:58, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Another useless political blog spamvertisement. --Timecop 07:01, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable blog. -- (aeropagitica) UK 07:12, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as blogcruft. Actually, the reference is to the Declaration of Independence not the Constitution. And all articles are not created equal, and are not endowed by their creator with any unalienable rights... Segv11 07:20, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Ah, sorry. Got the two confused. Fixed now.Hosterweis 07:25, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - non-notable vanity - Femmina 07:32, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Vanity --Depakote 11:47, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. God bless User:Timecop's anti-bloggery page. Proto t c 13:59, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable. Tapir
- Keep. The claim of only "five Google hits" is silly and obviously untrue (probably meant as an exaggeration not to be taken literally). If the Google search is refined to "The Inalienable Right"+"blog" for instance, you can see there are a few thousand hits; similarly you can search "linkdomain:federalistjournal.com" from Yahoo. References to the blog in the search output are relatively easily spotted by all three words being capitalized. There are a large number of links from other right-wing bloggers such as Michelle Malkin and Rathergate (not linked from the blogroll, but linked from within individual blog entries). The characterization of this page as self-promotion also seems inaccurate, it appears to be a straightforward description of the blog. We don't delete webpages on political grounds just because of their right-wing politics; although this is not an "A-list" blog it certainly appears to meet the minimum notability threshold. -- Curps 01:20, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Nearly all of the above voters appear to be GNAA members or meatpuppets responding to Timecop's "war on blogs", who don't seem to do much on Misplaced Pages other than "warring on blogs" and engaging in minor pranks or vandalism (for instance, User:Femmina adding User:Depakote's name to the List of big-bust models and performers ). Closing admin please take note. -- Curps 01:20, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
