Misplaced Pages

User talk:163.1.147.64: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:50, 14 February 2010 edit163.1.147.64 (talk) February 2010: Poor block Sarek, obviously didn't investigate more than superficially.~~~~← Previous edit Revision as of 18:58, 14 February 2010 edit undoTony Sidaway (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers81,722 edits ==Kary Mullis== {{subst:uw-probation|Kary Mullis|Misplaced Pages:General sanctions/Climate change probation}} -- ~~~~Next edit →
Line 36: Line 36:


Poor block Sarek, you obviously didn't investigate more than superficially.] (]) 18:50, 14 February 2010 (UTC) Poor block Sarek, you obviously didn't investigate more than superficially.] (]) 18:50, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
==]==
] Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed{{#if:Kary Mullis|, ],}} is on ]. {{#if:Misplaced Pages:General sanctions/Climate change probation|A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at ].|}} {{#if:|{{{3}}}|Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.<br><br>''The above is a ]. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you.''}}<!-- Template:uw-probation -->

In particular, please beware of edit warring on probation pages. -- ] 18:58, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:58, 14 February 2010

Attention:

This IP address, 163.1.147.64, is registered to Oxford University Computing Services and is shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts will be made to contact Oxford University Computing Services to report abuse.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself.

October 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Russel Blaylock. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Verbal chat 10:00, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

No, you are engaged in edit warring with me to insert falsities and mis-representations on an article that you have spent neither time nor trouble in improving. Misplaced Pages is not a playground for your/your friends' hit pieces.163.1.147.64 (talk) 10:18, 31 October 2009 (UTC)


If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2009

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Russell Blaylock, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Russell Blaylock was changed by 163.1.147.64 (u) (t) deleting 14214 characters on 2009-10-31T14:03:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:03, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Well I was hoping for someone or something with half a brain to see the egregious editing by members of the Fringe Police ™ but I got a bot. Hey ho.163.1.147.64 (talk) 14:04, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did with this edit to the page User talk:Verbal. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. The Ace of Spades(talk) 14:06, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Truth hurst sometimes, better the user gets this message more and more, mine is just one of many.163.1.147.64 (talk) 14:18, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

February 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kary Mullis. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. —DoRD (?) (talk) 12:24, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

No, I am not engaged in an edit war. Verbal is persistently reverting my removal of misinformation. For what reason they are doing that I don't know. It's what I learned when I was User:Wiki alf as sneaky vandalism. It's quite easy to see that the claim that Mullis has made a statement about the human factor of global warming is false. If it were true, then a time stamp from the video would be possible to quote at me. It isn't possible because he never made such a statement. It is therefore repeated insertion of misinformation and s/he is engaged in sneaky vandalism. The three revert rule does not apply to reverting vandalism whether it be sneaky or not.163.1.147.64 (talk) 12:39, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Department of Redundancy Department's edit summary regarding me quoting policy and specifically which part of that policy an editor is flaunting is "rubbish", how nice

Please see for discussion of your edit warring. Keepcalmandcarryon (talk) 17:51, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
Seen.163.1.147.64 (talk) 18:02, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:41, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Poor block Sarek, you obviously didn't investigate more than superficially.163.1.147.64 (talk) 18:50, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Kary Mullis

Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Kary Mullis, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Misplaced Pages:General sanctions/Climate change probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.

The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you.

In particular, please beware of edit warring on probation pages. -- TS 18:58, 14 February 2010 (UTC)