Revision as of 00:47, 19 May 2006 editYanksox (talk | contribs)Rollbackers12,375 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:30, 17 February 2010 edit undoGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits →Re: Al-Ahbash page: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
AmandaParker, "White Christian Terrorism" isn't a real term yet. It has yet to pop up, it's a hate crime. What occurs with Muslim Extremists are actual attacks on US Soil (like Embassys), that is attacking another nation. When the term pops up, then maybe it will get an article. But it's just a term that you have made up. I would classify it as racism and a hate crime because that is what it is. Take the cause of creating "White Christian Terrorism" to the world of academia, which is where it should be, Misplaced Pages is just a record keeper and not an official source. Write an article for a paper, not an internet site that tracks information. You have the right idea and the right cause. You just have the wrong medium. ] 00:47, 19 May 2006 (UTC) | AmandaParker, "White Christian Terrorism" isn't a real term yet. It has yet to pop up, it's a hate crime. What occurs with Muslim Extremists are actual attacks on US Soil (like Embassys), that is attacking another nation. When the term pops up, then maybe it will get an article. But it's just a term that you have made up. I would classify it as racism and a hate crime because that is what it is. Take the cause of creating "White Christian Terrorism" to the world of academia, which is where it should be, Misplaced Pages is just a record keeper and not an official source. Write an article for a paper, not an internet site that tracks information. You have the right idea and the right cause. You just have the wrong medium. ] 00:47, 19 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
== Re: Al-Ahbash page == | |||
Re : If the reverting gets out of hand, I suggest making a request to semi-protect the article at ]. -- ] (]) |
Revision as of 08:30, 17 February 2010
Your article on White Christin Terrorism has been proposed to be deleted. I think the article needs to eliminate POV, be cleaned up, and gain an expert opinion. I'll will assist you. Yanksox 15:59, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
As I stated before, I DIDN'T tag WCT for deletion. I placed the tags for improvement and point of view. As I stated before I am willing to fix it. The only reason it is proposed is because it is disorganized and it first person. Yanksox 18:04, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
I have edited WCT so that it redirects to Hate Crimes, White Christian Terrorism as a term itself really doesn't pop up any where on the internet. However, I will make a note of it on the Hate Crime page. Thank you, again feel free to contact me. Yanksox 18:12, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
I have thought about this topic for a little while, and I really feel secure about the fact that it exists as a hate crime. The term, "White Chrisitan Terrorism," doesn't really pop up by itself. It seems to be more of a crime that is racially, ethinically, religious, economically, etc. motivated. Hence, a hate crime. Yanksox 20:41, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Spam
Could you please not do that anymore? Tom Harrison 20:35, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
You are being biased. AmandaParker
- Not at all. I dislike spam no matter where it comes from. Tom Harrison 20:44, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Yes, you are. Why did you revert the page of White Christian Terrorism to Hate Crime. You are trying to show that white folks are the victims. AmandaParker
- I reverted your work because you spammed several article talk pages with copies of an identical editorial screed. That's disruptive, and I'd appreciate it if you'd not do it again. Also, Misplaced Pages has a policy of no personal attacks. Saying, "You're biased" could be easily mistaken for such an attack, and it is certainly uncivil. Tom Harrison 20:49, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- This encylcopedia is filled with examples of crimes by white Christians. However, the term "White Christian Terrorism" receives 1 google hit. When it becomes a real term, then there can be an article about it.--Bill 20:49, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
See. How many Christians jump in to defend themselves. Calling 1.2 billion Muslims "terrorist" are one of the biggest and worst Hate Crime and Personal Attacks. I am not talking about "crimes" here. I am talking about White Christian Terrorism. And if Google doesn't have any link for this term. It doesn't mean that White Christian Terrorism doesn't exist. Few years, there was no term of "Islamic Terrorism" and now everybody is using it. AmandaParker
If "Islamic Terrorism" can be tolerated then why not White Christian Terrorism. Is wikipedia only for the white folks?
If "Islamic Terrorism" can be tolerated then why not White Christian Terrorism. Is wikipedia only for the white folks?
Misplaced Pages is blind in regards to religion, race, political alignment, etc. "White Chrisitan Terrorism," does not make one single hit on google. The only hit is "White Christian(s), terrorism." What you are trying to create is something that is considered a hate crime and racism. Yanksox 20:46, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
"Hate crime"? "Racism"? Calling 1.2 billion muslims "terrorists" and allowing the terms like "Islamic Terrorism" is not a "Hate crime" or "Racism". Taking off innocent Muslims off the planes coz the fellow passengers didn't feel "comfortable" or making movies to criminalize innocent human beings is not "hate crime" or "racism"? Asking from muslims to continuously apologize for 911 and other acts which were committed by some lunatics and yet not apologizing for White Christian Terrorism is not "hate crime" or "racism"? It is time for the White Christian Terrorists to have the taste of their own medicine which they shoving down the throat of others for centuries. What you guys are doing is harrassment and forcing me to stop contributing to wikipedia which claims to be neutral and yet allow 1.2 billion human beings to be called "terrorists" and yet White Christian Terrorists crimes against humanity, genocide, holocausts squat free. It is double standard and hypocrisy. AmandaParker
AmandaParker, "White Christian Terrorism" isn't a real term yet. It has yet to pop up, it's a hate crime. What occurs with Muslim Extremists are actual attacks on US Soil (like Embassys), that is attacking another nation. When the term pops up, then maybe it will get an article. But it's just a term that you have made up. I would classify it as racism and a hate crime because that is what it is. Take the cause of creating "White Christian Terrorism" to the world of academia, which is where it should be, Misplaced Pages is just a record keeper and not an official source. Write an article for a paper, not an internet site that tracks information. You have the right idea and the right cause. You just have the wrong medium. Yanksox 00:47, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
Re: Al-Ahbash page
Re your message: If the reverting gets out of hand, I suggest making a request to semi-protect the article at WP:RFPP. -- Gogo Dodo (talk)