Misplaced Pages

User talk:Neptunerover: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:32, 21 February 2010 editNeptunerover (talk | contribs)1,605 edits Riddle of the Sphinx?: why?← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:34, 24 February 2010 edit undoCunard (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users41,034 editsm redirecting to userpage 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT ]
{{mbox
|type = notice
|image = ]
|style = width:52%; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto;
|text = <div>
'''This {{#ifeq:historical|ip|]|user}} has been ] from editing Misplaced Pages{{#if:|&#x20;for a period of {{{time}}}}}{{#if:|&#x20;by {{{by}}}}}.'''<br /><small>(see: {{•}} ]{{•}} ]{{•}} )</small>
</div>
}}{{#switch:historical|ip={{#if:||]}}|historical=]|]}}<!-- Template:Blocked_user -->

== Blocked ==
: <small>The user that started the thread (]) was indefinately blocked for continued disruptive editing here (]) and elsewhere immediately after his prior 12-hour block expired.</small>

<div class="user-block"> ] You have been '''] indefinitely''' from editing for {{#if:continuous disruptive and tendentious editing|'''continuous disruptive and tendentious editing'''|repeated ]}}. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our ] first. {{#if:yes|]] 21:37, 2 February 2010 (UTC)|}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block3 -->

Misplaced Pages is ]. Per your continued use of this page in that format, this page has been ] and locked. You may ] by mailing your unblock request to unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org. &mdash; ] 14:33, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
:Protection lifted after email exchange with NeptuneRover. &mdash; ] 04:28, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

==== Riddle of the Sphinx? ====
Were {{BASEPAGENAME}} to solve the Riddle of the Sphinx, or a similar modern-day conundrum by making sense of it, could he be released from his indefinite block? How about ]? --] (]) 05:25, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Personally, I think ] makes a whole lot of sense, perfect sense, and I can't believe it's just me! Why does stuff always have to make sense just to me? --] (]) 09:28, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

:An unblock will be predicated on recognizing the causes for the block and avoidance of them from here out. Riddles are not involved. Neptune, I'll note that I'm receiving multiple questions about why I've unlocked this talk page since you apparently have no interest in attempting to edit productively. Unless something changes, I'm guessing this page will be relocked within the week. &mdash; ] 16:58, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

::I would support a block (and content wipe) of both this and the corresponding User: page. NeptuneRover needs to understand that his time at Misplaced Pages is over and continuing to stir up controversy and grief - even at the level of just this page - is finished. He also needs to know that he's on my personal email blocklist so he can stop spamming me personally too because it's all going into the trashcan without me ever needing to see it. ] (]) 21:29, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

:::I too have seen enough...I AGF, but only up to a point. Time to move along and find somewhere else to play. Lock this page and move on. ] (]) 21:34, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

All you had to say was no. What did I do wrong? I didn't use the unblock template to ask that question. What I wrote is not something forbidden on Misplaced Pages. --] (]) 23:32, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

== Inappropriate behavior ==

(the edit summary) is completely inappropriate. Do not repeat this sort of behavior. &mdash; ] 17:48, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
:He came by and reverted me for the very same thing he got blocked for recently, and I also found it interesting that he failed to acknowledge my apology while previously he has seemed eager to discuss my behaviour. Thank you for pointing out my mistake. I will do my best to avoid future antagonizing edit summaries (even though he's told me to 'piss off' in more than one of his edit summaries--it's not appropriate, and I shall desist). --] (]) 20:15, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:34, 24 February 2010

Redirect to: