| Revision as of 01:40, 13 January 2006 editGrace Note (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,516 edits Arbcom voting← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:01, 14 January 2006 edit undoPgio (talk | contribs)116 edits →Arbcom votingNext edit → | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| I'm sorry. I've done all the voting I'm going to do. I've only voted for those editors that have name recognition for me. Maybe next year. ] 01:40, 13 January 2006 (UTC) | I'm sorry. I've done all the voting I'm going to do. I've only voted for those editors that have name recognition for me. Maybe next year. ] 01:40, 13 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Yeah, WMC is IMHO a jerk. And very soon, and admin! But unfortunately I don't have enough edits to help your Arbcom vote either. ] 07:01, 14 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:01, 14 January 2006
Welcome!
Hi LawAndOrder! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Misplaced Pages community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Misplaced Pages page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! --JorgeBeach 01:28, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/FCYTravis
The RFC you filed against FCYTravis, Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/FCYTravis is wrongfully written and malformed and it's probaly won't meet the minimum requirements after 48 hours from creation are considered "uncertified" and will be de-listed or deleted soon. Sorry --Jaranda 02:41, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- What are you talking about? The user RFC that I created couldn't have been more rightfully written and well-formed. I would understand you telling that obvious falsehood to third parties, but why tell it to me personally? LawAndOrder 17:10, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
Arbcom candidate userbox
Greetings. I've made a new userbox for arbcom candidates to show on their userpages so that visiters will know they're running.
- {{User arbcom nom}}
If you'd like to place it on your userpage, feel free. Regards, – Quadell 02:22, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Thankyou. I have added it. LawAndOrder
Arbcom Vote
Listen, you seem like a nice enough fellow, but those who oppose you, the bulk of them, are right, you have far too litle experience to sit on the ArbCom. Make a year of solid edits, don't be a jagoff like me, show a good understanding for Wiki's rules, be fair, and I will gladly support your 2007 candidacy.
Later. DTC 21:10, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
- As I stated in the answers to my questions, I have read many wikipedia articles, policy pages, conflicts, and page histories. It's experience; just not the recorded kind. LawAndOrder 21:23, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
Arbcom voting
I'm sorry. I've done all the voting I'm going to do. I've only voted for those editors that have name recognition for me. Maybe next year. Grace Note 01:40, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, WMC is IMHO a jerk. And very soon, and admin! But unfortunately I don't have enough edits to help your Arbcom vote either. Pgio 07:01, 14 January 2006 (UTC)