| Revision as of 17:46, 24 March 2010 editPiotrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers285,745 edits →Excellent point← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:54, 26 March 2010 edit undoStrausszek (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,953 edits →Namibian war: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
| :::Ha. --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 17:45, 24 March 2010 (UTC) | :::Ha. --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 17:45, 24 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
| :::PS. WalterBot is operational, meaning that unref BLP listings have been updated for WikiProjects. --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 17:46, 24 March 2010 (UTC) | :::PS. WalterBot is operational, meaning that unref BLP listings have been updated for WikiProjects. --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 17:46, 24 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == Namibian war == | |||
| Look, if you're surmising I am taking this discussion because I would want to exonerate the German army you're completely in the wrong lane. My concern is the value and reliability of the site, not to push some agenda. When I'm making points about fallacious editing leading to flimsy nad false statements, edit wars and agenda writing, please recall that this is a place where anyone can edit more or less anything and people like to push in strongly worded statements about things they feel powerfully about, or think they "know". They don't risk anyhting by doing that because everyone is anonymous here, an no one has a reputation or a known job to protect, but that also makes things a bit harder than when you're discussing a subject in a circle of people where everyone knows everyone and one can count on that people are circumspect about things. ] (]) 07:54, 26 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:54, 26 March 2010
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Tom Mix
Fine about the Talk/user. I explained WHY the footnote on Mix in the Ciudad Juarez article doesn't justify the claim in the article. It only 'associates' him w/ the battle. No solid claim of participation. According to IMDB, he made 14 movies in 1911, 4 in 1912. Unless you can give stronger positive evidence and/or refute the IMDB:http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0594291/, I intend to remove the reference. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tapered (talk • contribs) 09:25, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Battle of Monte de las Cruces
Go for it! Thelmadatter (talk) 19:37, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Seems high to me too, but Im no military person. Your source seems more reliable (though I have my doubts about the crucification of theives), Ill make the adjustments.Thelmadatter (talk) 16:28, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Wyandanch (sachem)
|
On March 14, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Wyandanch (sachem), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist (talk) 12:04, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Wheeler's Surprise
|
|
On March 19, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Wheeler's Surprise, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Muttawmp
|
|
On March 19, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Muttawmp, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Matoonas
|
|
On March 19, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Matoonas, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist (talk) 00:05, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Edward Hutchinson (captain)
|
|
On March 19, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Edward Hutchinson (captain), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist (talk) 00:05, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Thomas Wheeler
|
|
On March 19, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Thomas Wheeler, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist (talk) 00:05, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Excellent point
Re: . --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 20:04, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- Ahaha. Hahahahaha. How come I didn't think of drawing that parallel? Thanks! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 01:16, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
- At least, knock on wood, it's not 'Elegy of Fortinbras'.radek (talk) 01:21, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
- ZH as always rocks.
- wierzyłeś w kryształowe pojęcia a nie glinę ludzką
- Ha. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 17:45, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
- PS. WalterBot is operational, meaning that unref BLP listings have been updated for WikiProjects. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 17:46, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Namibian war
Look, if you're surmising I am taking this discussion because I would want to exonerate the German army you're completely in the wrong lane. My concern is the value and reliability of the site, not to push some agenda. When I'm making points about fallacious editing leading to flimsy nad false statements, edit wars and agenda writing, please recall that this is a place where anyone can edit more or less anything and people like to push in strongly worded statements about things they feel powerfully about, or think they "know". They don't risk anyhting by doing that because everyone is anonymous here, an no one has a reputation or a known job to protect, but that also makes things a bit harder than when you're discussing a subject in a circle of people where everyone knows everyone and one can count on that people are circumspect about things. Strausszek (talk) 07:54, 26 March 2010 (UTC)