Misplaced Pages

User talk:Parasti: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:31, 15 January 2006 editLeyasu (talk | contribs)2,797 edits →Welcome!← Previous edit Revision as of 14:52, 15 January 2006 edit undoDanteferno (talk | contribs)2,428 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 19: Line 19:


Might want to keep any eye on the Gothic Metal page as such, make sure this vandalism and disruption of Misplaced Pages doesnt carry on. ] 13:31, 15 January 2006 (UTC) Might want to keep any eye on the Gothic Metal page as such, make sure this vandalism and disruption of Misplaced Pages doesnt carry on. ] 13:31, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

==Gothic Metal article ==

No, there was no concensus reached. There were many arguments/points unsettled that Leyasu still failed to answer, and the archive of the discussion reflects that well. And removing those tags without bringing it up to discussion constitutes as vandalism. ] 14:33, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:52, 15 January 2006

Welcome!

Hello Parasti, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  -- SoothingR 12:36, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

That is for like if I link my autobiography about my life, but I see your point. However, I need use "A Growing Metal Forum" as a comment which is true. My site can be notable one day. But even not it can still be of use to someone. And I think of it as not MY site BUT a site open to all METALHEADS. METALGOD42088 03:13, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Danteinferno

Nice call on the templates. Hes doing this because i revised the article when he written it, mostly coz it was all a crock of shit. Now he is back and hes going around reverting my edits and reverting most any edits made to the articles that are 'his' that he lists on his user page.

Might want to keep any eye on the Gothic Metal page as such, make sure this vandalism and disruption of Misplaced Pages doesnt carry on. Leyasu 13:31, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Gothic Metal article

No, there was no concensus reached. There were many arguments/points unsettled that Leyasu still failed to answer, and the archive of the discussion reflects that well. And removing those tags without bringing it up to discussion constitutes as vandalism. Danteferno 14:33, 15 January 2006 (UTC)