| Revision as of 16:15, 16 January 2006 editGhirlandajo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers89,629 editsNo edit summary | Revision as of 17:16, 16 January 2006 edit undoGhirlandajo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers89,629 edits four tildasNext edit → | ||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{welcome}} --] | ] 16:51, 16 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, if you think that you would push your agenda by revert warring, you are wrong. Thousands of historians for several generations disputed the battle's outcome before you and me. Don't invent the bycicle. If you continue to disrupt Misplaced Pages, you may be blocked from editing. Take care, ] | ] 16:15, 16 January 2006 (UTC) | Hello, if you think that you would push your agenda by revert warring, you are wrong. Thousands of historians for several generations disputed the battle's outcome before you and me. Don't invent the bycicle. If you continue to disrupt Misplaced Pages, you may be blocked from editing. Take care, ] | ] 16:15, 16 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| It's great that your aim is not revert warring. I moved your comments to ] where more editors can see them. IMHO the article has a clear pro-French bias. The battle had gave Napoleon no clear advantage, as he failed to annihilate the Russian army, as was his intention, and was constrained to follow it further away from his power base in Poland, which eventually resulted in a catastrophe for him. I checked ] for a NPOV source; it doesn't speculate which victory it was noticing that "Although the Russian army was badly mauled, it survived to fight again and, in the end, drove Napoleon out of Russia". I am going ask for a third opinion on the subject. --] | ] 16:51, 16 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Please post your comments on ] and not on my talk page. And please don't forget to sign your comments with four tildas. Thanks. --] | ] 17:15, 16 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:16, 16 January 2006
Welcome!
Hi UberCryxic! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Misplaced Pages community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Misplaced Pages page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! --Ghirla | talk 16:51, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
Hello, if you think that you would push your agenda by revert warring, you are wrong. Thousands of historians for several generations disputed the battle's outcome before you and me. Don't invent the bycicle. If you continue to disrupt Misplaced Pages, you may be blocked from editing. Take care, Ghirla | talk 16:15, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
It's great that your aim is not revert warring. I moved your comments to Talk:Battle of Borodino where more editors can see them. IMHO the article has a clear pro-French bias. The battle had gave Napoleon no clear advantage, as he failed to annihilate the Russian army, as was his intention, and was constrained to follow it further away from his power base in Poland, which eventually resulted in a catastrophe for him. I checked Britannica for a NPOV source; it doesn't speculate which victory it was noticing that "Although the Russian army was badly mauled, it survived to fight again and, in the end, drove Napoleon out of Russia". I am going ask for a third opinion on the subject. --Ghirla | talk 16:51, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
Please post your comments on Talk:Battle of Borodino and not on my talk page. And please don't forget to sign your comments with four tildas. Thanks. --Ghirla | talk 17:15, 16 January 2006 (UTC)