Misplaced Pages

User:Factomancer: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:34, 15 April 2010 editFactomancer (talk | contribs)3,045 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 16:49, 15 April 2010 edit undoFactomancer (talk | contribs)3,045 edits Replaced content with 'This user is going for a long break. Bosses are bad enough when you are being paid to deal with them.'Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
This user is going for a long break.
== Unequal implementation of a supposedly bilateral interaction ban ==


Bosses are bad enough when you are being paid to deal with them.

The ban clearly states: '''Repeated spurious reports to administrators using this mechanism shall be grounds for blocking for disruption.'''

The other party has made at least three spurious complaints about my behaviour to the admins, behaviour that did not involve any violations of the ban and did not result in any blocks.

* .
* .
* .

I, meanwhile, have been repeatedly blocked for merely mentioning the name of the other party in the ban and have been treated '''extremely harshly''' by the admins in question - Georgewilliamherbert and Sandstein.

So when I complained to the admin in question about all these spurious complaints and that they violated the "Repeated spurious reports" clause, '''I''' was blocked for "griping" by ]. '''This admin has a long history of persecuting me''' that you can read on my talk page.

So am I to accept that another user is allowed to '''continually criticize me, comment on my behaviour and accuse me''' but when I protest about it I am subject to being blocked?

This is a '''psychologically abusive situation''', and I don't think I will be able to continue to contribute to Misplaced Pages if I am to be the subject of continual accusations with no means to defend myself. I don't think anyone could and that this so-called interaction ban is being used as an ad hoc means to drive me off Misplaced Pages for good.

No doubt I will be blocked for a very long time by either Georgewilliamherbert or Sandstein for making this report, given how they use the ban to block me for anything they like, so this is probably going to be my final notice to Misplaced Pages.

Update: I was threatened with a community ban by Sandstein for complaining on ] for the terrible crime of criticizing the decision of the admins. I'm not the one banning people here.

I don't care if I'm eventually banned by them (it's inevitable) but I'm not going to make it easy.

Revision as of 16:49, 15 April 2010

This user is going for a long break.

Bosses are bad enough when you are being paid to deal with them.