Misplaced Pages

User talk:Wtshymanski: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:56, 19 April 2010 editWtshymanski (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users76,111 edits *what* "attack" ? The bogus tag was a bogus tag. Blanked page again.← Previous edit Revision as of 13:17, 20 April 2010 edit undoTenOfAllTrades (talk | contribs)Administrators21,283 edits Caution regarding edit war at voltage: new sectionNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
Blanked the page. Blanked the page.

== Caution regarding edit war at ] ==

I will note that ''both'' parties – {{user|Wtshymanski}} ''and'' {{user|Wdl1961}} – are engaged in an edit war at {{article|voltage}}. ''Both'' of you need to use the article talk page for something other than 3RR threats and nasty remarks. While the three-revert rule sets out an absolute minimum standard, it does not represent an entitlement or allowance for ongoing edit warring. If I see either one of you revert the other without having engaged in meaningful discussion and consensus-building on the article talk page, I will block.

In order to resolve a content dispute there are a number of appropriate steps, which I expect you two to use. Refer to the instructions for ], try asking for a ], or file a suitable ]. Be patient, and stay cool. ](]) 13:16, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:17, 20 April 2010

Blanked the page.

Caution regarding edit war at voltage

I will note that both parties – Wtshymanski (talk · contribs) and Wdl1961 (talk · contribs) – are engaged in an edit war at Voltage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Both of you need to use the article talk page for something other than 3RR threats and nasty remarks. While the three-revert rule sets out an absolute minimum standard, it does not represent an entitlement or allowance for ongoing edit warring. If I see either one of you revert the other without having engaged in meaningful discussion and consensus-building on the article talk page, I will block.

In order to resolve a content dispute there are a number of appropriate steps, which I expect you two to use. Refer to the instructions for dispute resolution, try asking for a third opinion, or file a suitable request for comment. Be patient, and stay cool. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 13:16, 20 April 2010 (UTC)