Revision as of 19:16, 27 April 2010 view sourceDave1185 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers25,447 editsm commented← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:19, 27 April 2010 view source Xeno (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Administrators103,385 edits →Copycat: reNext edit → | ||
Line 164: | Line 164: | ||
:This is hardly disengaging... –]] 19:11, 27 April 2010 (UTC) | :This is hardly disengaging... –]] 19:11, 27 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
::*You know something? I agree~! Let's be on our merry way now and ignore the fiendish one, shall we? --] <sup><span style="font-family:Italic;color:black">]</span></sup> 19:16, 27 April 2010 (UTC) | ::*You know something? I agree~! Let's be on our merry way now and ignore the fiendish one, shall we? --] <sup><span style="font-family:Italic;color:black">]</span></sup> 19:16, 27 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::*Just to be clear, I was talking about your coming to Bug's page to ask him to comment on an issue you said you were going to disengage from. –]] 19:19, 27 April 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:19, 27 April 2010
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = => CAUTION: This page may contain SATIRE posing as data. <= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
|
Transients welcome
Click here to LOG OUT: Special:Userlogout
NOTE: You will then be editing with your IP address exposed to the world.
So USE WITH CAUTION. ←Baseball Bugs carrots→ 07:19, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- Next thing you know, someone using the Roadrunner ISP is gonna say something like this: "Meep, meep!". --ACME contributor: → Dave 09:03, 4 April 2010 (UTC) ←
de bait
This digression has been archived. Please do not muddify it. |
---|
|
Genesis creation myth
What do you mean by "validity" of the myth ? It's been scientifically proven beyond reasonable doubt that the Earth is not 4000 years old. WP:NPOV doesn't mean we have to treat all positions as "equally valid". The word myth points the reader to the fact that the narrative is in fact symbolic structure, and not meant to be taken literally. Claritas (talk) 16:07, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- Genesis does not necessarily say the earth is 4,000 years old. That's just one interpretation. No one has "proven" anything in regard to Genesis. And "myth" is understood by the average citizen to mean "fairy tale". Hence it's not appropriate as a title. ←Baseball Bugs carrots→ 16:21, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
Hello, Baseball Bugs. You have new messages at I dream of horses's talk page.Message added 18:38, 20 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I dream of horses @ 18:38, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello, Baseball Bugs. You have new messages at I dream of horses's talk page.Message added 18:44, 20 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
--I dream of horses @ 18:45, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Impostor
He's back again but you already knew, eh? What gives? --Dave 03:48, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
- Could Pioneercourthouse, could be Lightcurrent. Or some other bozo. ←Baseball Bugs carrots→ 03:53, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
- These fellas are really no-lifers. BTW, do you watch LLS with Craig Ferguson? --Dave 03:56, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
- If we could harness their wasted energy, we could light up Weehauken for a year. ←Baseball Bugs carrots→ 04:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
- How about lighting up the Antarctic/Arctic region during the long cold and dark months? Tsk tsk tsk... such wasted talent~! --Dave 04:05, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
- No, but I probably should. ←Baseball Bugs carrots→ 04:00, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
- For the record, I must say that he is funnier than his boss David Letterman. And as for the impostor, it is the exit door for him again... guess there won't be any bus ride this time, eh? ;P --Dave 04:05, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
- I don't recall what his pseudonym was last time, but it occurs to me that he might have a lot of variations on it, some of which he might have created already. It would be fun to head them off at the pass. ←Baseball Bugs carrots→ 04:08, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Barnstar of Good Humor
The Barnstar of Good Humor | ||
Awarded for making me laugh harder than I had ever laughed before while going through Recent Changes. Thanks! –Grondemar 15:43, 22 April 2010 (UTC) |
List of The Backyardigans episodes
I need your help. Please watch list the page for a week or so. 63.223.127.4 (talk) 01:54, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
- I'm not familiar with the show. How would I know which version of the debated info is correct? ←Baseball Bugs carrots→ 02:49, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
- Please just look after it for me for about a week. You will see the IP vandal changing small facts. This is an important article for me. 63.223.127.4 (talk) 15:15, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
fyi
I believe that issues such as the one I raise here are among your areas of expertise.--Epeefleche (talk) 07:03, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
Take Five
Us both coming up with the same answer, within 5 minutes of each other, suggests that the "cloned from toenail clippings" theory was right. :-) StuRat (talk) 15:24, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
- Scary, ain't it? ←Baseball Bugs carrots→ 19:01, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
- Man, that Time Out album was a killer. Still have it, in case I ever get around to digitizing eight feet of vinyl. One thing, though, is that the songs are hard to whistle. Blue Rondo à la Turk, for example, is in 9/8, with a 2-2-2-3 pattern. It's hard to not make that last 3 into a triplet and force the meter into 4/4. Lemme get out my banjo and try... PhGustaf (talk) 20:16, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
The Refdesk Barnstar
Thanks for Take Five -- exactly what I needed! DRosenbach |
photos
You wrote:
- Then there needs to be a project to review all celeb photographs for "appropriateness" or "encyclopedic" value. Picking on one guy's photograph, when you've seen far worse, while leaving other "unflattering" photos intact, is itself inappropriate.
Maybe you are right. I'll think about this. I'm currently going by the theory that when a BLP subject comes after us and wants their biography taken down, our only sane public defense if we keep it has to include "look, the article meets super-high standards" which has to include the photography in it. We're less uptight with non-disputed articles. There's one right now (I won't say which) with quite an awful photo, but the subject is an active wikipedia editor and hasn't said anything about it, so I don't worry about it. 69.228.170.24 (talk) 12:14, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
FYI
Once again: Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive_editing_practices_of_User:Mk5384 -OberRanks (talk) 13:42, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Re Planet
Perhaps we should be glad element 92 wasn't named Uranusium, see name etymologies#U, & . I was thinking we could avoid that word by using thesymbol. But it looks like the south end of a cat heading north! ;-) --220.101.28.25 (talk) 04:02, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Copycat
Appreciate your opinion here~! Peeling away now... toodles~! --Dave 19:02, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- I just want Dave1185 to stop. Wispanow (talk) 19:04, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- Wow... he's a great stalker, following me wherever I go! Can I report him for stalking me? --Dave 19:07, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- This is hardly disengaging... –xeno 19:11, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- You know something? I agree~! Let's be on our merry way now and ignore the fiendish one, shall we? --Dave 19:16, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- Just to be clear, I was talking about your coming to Bug's page to ask him to comment on an issue you said you were going to disengage from. –xeno 19:19, 27 April 2010 (UTC)