Revision as of 03:57, 28 April 2010 editKtr101 (talk | contribs)104,342 edits endorsed it← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:37, 28 April 2010 edit undoSpitfire (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers29,508 edits →Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments: DeclineNext edit → | ||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>====== | ||
{{RFCU| D | No2ndletter | |
{{RFCU| D | No2ndletter | Decline }} <small>Requested by -- <u style="text-decoration:none; font-family: papyrus;">] <small><sub><font color="maroon">]</font></sub><sup><font color="green">]</font></sup></small></u> 23:35, 27 April 2010 (UTC) </small> | ||
{{Endorse}} We might as well confirm their suspicions. ] (]) 03:57, 28 April 2010 (UTC) | {{Endorse}} We might as well confirm their suspicions. ] (]) 03:57, 28 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
{{Decline}} per ], checkusers will generally not draw links to specific IPs, this will need to be decided on the behavioural evidence, although I'm going to say right now that even if the account and the IP are attached they wouldn't have violated 3rr (although they would have violated ] per ). ]<sup>]</sup> 08:37, 28 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
---- | ---- |
Revision as of 08:37, 28 April 2010
Wtsao
Wtsao (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Wtsao/Archive.
Report date April 27 2010, 23:35 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
- 79.181.50.218 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
Evidence submitted by SamJohnston
Suspected WP:3RR violation (, , , ) by WP:SPA associated with a disruptive and tendentious editing rampage by User:Wtsao (details at WP:ANI).
WP:PP applied by User:Moonriddengirl who agrees that this "look like somebody may be logging out to avoid 3RR" and suggested that I raise the issue at WP:SPI. -- samj in 23:35, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.
- Checkuser request – code letter: D (3RR using socks )
- Current status – Declined, the reason can be found below. Requested by -- samj in 23:35, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Clerk endorsed We might as well confirm their suspicions. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:57, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Clerk declined per m:CheckUser policy, checkusers will generally not draw links to specific IPs, this will need to be decided on the behavioural evidence, although I'm going to say right now that even if the account and the IP are attached they wouldn't have violated 3rr (although they would have violated WP:SCRUTINY per this edit summary). Spitfire 08:37, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Category: