| Revision as of 21:43, 8 May 2010 view sourceNug (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers22,427 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:07, 16 May 2010 view source Shell Kinney (talk | contribs)33,094 edits →Your comment: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| |archive = User talk:Martintg/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:Martintg/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == Your comment == | |||
| Just to clarify, I had hoped I made it clear when discussing your participation that anyone under an interaction ban needed to be very careful commenting on the case. Vecrumba went way over the line, again, and was even independently blocked. I regret that giving you some leeway in presenting proposals not directly related to the SPI ended in others assuming it was a free-for-all; I appreciate your continued decorum in handling the case. ] <sup>]</sup> 02:07, 16 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:07, 16 May 2010
"Civilization is the progress toward a society of privacy. The savage's whole existence is public, ruled by the laws of his tribe." Ayn RandYour comment
Just to clarify, I had hoped I made it clear when discussing your participation that anyone under an interaction ban needed to be very careful commenting on the case. Vecrumba went way over the line, again, and was even independently blocked. I regret that giving you some leeway in presenting proposals not directly related to the SPI ended in others assuming it was a free-for-all; I appreciate your continued decorum in handling the case. Shell 02:07, 16 May 2010 (UTC)