Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 21:35, 26 May 2010

Archives

• Archive 1 • Archive 2 • Archive 3

Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Bullshido.net (2nd nomination)

Since you nominated Bullshido.net for deletion at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Bullshido.net (2nd nomination), you may be interested in my renomination of the article for deletion. If you would like to participate in that debate, please comment at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Bullshido.net (3rd nomination). Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:44, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Smiley face murder theory

Thanks for participating at the RFC for this article in the past. Unfortunately, despite what was a clear consensus, the people trying to slant the article to the fringe view simply shopped around until they got enough other people to show up, and they are very aggressive about wanting the POV there. One of the arguments there is the typical "people used to think the sun revolved around the earth, and by your arguments we wouldn't have been allowed to say otherwise" silliness. There are also strong indications of at least one sockpuppet at work. If you cared about your input there it might help to come back and reiterate it. DreamGuy (talk) 00:24, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Hate to bug you again, but some extremely aggressive editors on this article are claiming that I was the only person who opposed their changes and that consensus is against me and that I am a liar and all sorts of bizarre claims. If you have the time to come back and weigh in again it'd be very helpful. DreamGuy (talk) 16:21, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:January 1984 Gazette Cover.png

Thanks for uploading File:January 1984 Gazette Cover.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:47, 24 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 16:47, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

McDojo

Thanks for the tags, I'll have scan though now, but will have to be the weekend to have a proper look & add the sources. --Nate/_c 08:48, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Log/2009 October 2#Bullshido.net

Since you participated in Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Bullshido.net (3rd nomination), which was closed as "no consensus", you may be interested in a subsequent DRV. Since I disagreed with the close, I contacted the closing admin, who responded, "To be honest, Cunard, I would tend to agree with you, but I am not sure if the balance of things heads to delete rather than no consensus. Listing it at DRV might be a good option here; I won't endorse or oppose the close and will allow the DRV community to decide it. Therefore, I have listed this article at DRV; if you would like to participate, please see Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Log/2009 October 2#Bullshido.net. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 21:10, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

AE

Please consult sockpuppet investigations for your concerns on sbs108--Tznkai (talk) 21:42, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

SSB

I strongly suggest you take a look at WP:ETIQUETTE, and refrain from such foul language in your edit summaries. "Dammit, who put this shit back in?" is not appropriate in the least, and I'm sure you can convey your point without cursing, which can be viewed by whoever edited the page. I found your "edit summary" rather offensive. Thanks, Onopearls 22:13, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

You are at 3 reverts in a 24 hour period on the article. Just giving you a heads up that you're at the 3RR, so you won't get in any trouble. And You might want to read this section of the SSB talk page that Mfield wrote.

Merkey AfD

Re: "Given the amount of trouble that this article and its subject have caused, we're probably better off with deletion." I suggest you strike this out or remove it. Including something like this in a nomination, let alone ending a nomination in such a way, makes it look like there personal issues involved. --Ronz (talk) 22:33, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Attack on Erik Moeller

This is going too far... Please review your conduct on this matter in view of WP:DISRUPT and WP:NPA.

Please find a way to advocate or move towards banner changes which does not violate policy and basic civility expectations of contributors. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 23:41, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Stay civil.

Edit summaries such as "stop trolling - my statement is fairly clear, the talk page consensus is almost 100% against this except for you and 2 or 3 sanctioned troublemakers" are not productive. Please stay civil.Headbomb {_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 17:23, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Cookies - whoo!

Cerebellum has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

I'm afraid I'm getting a little carried away over at the Google Watch AFD, so please accept this tasty cookie as a token of friendship. I always have difficulty remembering that yes, there is a person on the other side of that computer screen. Cheers! Cerebellum (talk) 20:04, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

ANI notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. —KuyaBriBri 23:08, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

For the record, I personally don't think that what you did was malicious, just maybe not well thought through. - Tbsdy lives (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) 12:30, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

• The best way to deal with it is simply to WP:PROD them. It's unlikely that many will be challenged, those that are can be AfDd if they aren't improved. Guy (Help!) 13:26, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Redefine what the peer-review literature is listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Redefine what the peer-review literature is. Since you had some involvement with the Redefine what the peer-review literature is redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). 03:06, 2 February 2010 (UTC)147.70.242.54 (talk)

HARRY READ ME.txt listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect HARRY READ ME.txt. Since you had some involvement with the HARRY READ ME.txt redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). 147.70.242.54 (talk) 03:09, 2 February 2010 (UTC)}}

FYI

I saw your revert of my edit on Menachem Mendel Schneerson. Your editsummary, that my opinion "makes no sense", is not very complimentory, nor explanatory. Please take part in the discussion on the talk page at Talk:Menachem_Mendel_Schneerson#Liz_Leyden. If you have no arguments to make there, your revert is likely to be undone soon. Debresser (talk) 21:11, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Surprise!

		The Curator Barnstar
		For taking the time scan old computer magazines used as references. Pcap ping 09:47, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

User talk:Xiutwel-0002

• WP:ANI#Return of banned editor
• Kaaskop6666 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
• Xiutwel (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
• Xiutwel-0002 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

You posted at ANI about this editor.

It appears that Xiutwel should be considered the master account. His WP:AE restrictions are linked from Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive26. In my opinion, Xiutwel-0002 should be indef blocked for evasion, and told to ask for unblock as Xiutwel. I am not sure whether unblock would be granted; I can see arguments on both sides. EdJohnston (talk) 17:34, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

File:1955 doubled die cent.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:1955 doubled die cent.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:01, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

File:1796 Draped Bust Small Eagle Quarter.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:1796 Draped Bust Small Eagle Quarter.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:01, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 10 Agorot controversy

The article 10 Agorot controversy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No source for Arafat's statements or any source that reflects this as a controversy. Regardless, one individual's statements hardly comprise a "controversy."

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Plot Spoiler (talk) 19:00, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Actually, literature about 10 Agorot controversy is given in article, as well as official Israeli response. --DowJonesFan (talk) 19:25, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Wales Parody Donation Banner.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wales Parody Donation Banner.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock 22:20, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

File:BoxCutterBlade.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BoxCutterBlade.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock 22:21, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Fleischer Superman image.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fleischer Superman image.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock 22:22, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:SterileEditWar

Template:SterileEditWar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock 22:28, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Badwareunderinvestigation.png

Thanks for uploading File:Badwareunderinvestigation.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock 22:30, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Your RfA

Might I suggest you withdraw? It seems like a snow close right now.  fetchcomms☛ 23:01, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

I would second that. I would close it now but you have been here long enough that you know whats going on. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 01:21, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Your RfA has been closed

I regret to inform you that I have closed your RfA as unsuccessful. I strongly encourage you to carefully review the comments made by those participating and use them to work on areas which may help you in a future request. If you have any questions, please let me know. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 03:36, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

File:SterileEditWar.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SterileEditWar.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock 05:17, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Misplaced Pages:You're either with us or against us

Misplaced Pages:You're either with us or against us, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:You're either with us or against us and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Misplaced Pages:You're either with us or against us during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Equazcion 13:23, 12 May 2010 (UTC) 13:23, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Log/2009 October 2#Bullshido.net

Hi, Crotalus horridus. Because you participated in Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Log/2009 October 2#Bullshido.net, you may be interested in Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Bullshido.net (4th nomination). Cunard (talk) 21:13, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Richard Goldstone - new version

You commented recently on some BLP issues concerning Richard Goldstone. I've written a considerably expanded and improved version of the article in my userspace at User:ChrisO/Goldstone. If you have any comments about this new version before it gets transferred into article space, please feel free to comment at Talk:Richard Goldstone#New version. -- ChrisO (talk) 23:27, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Notification: General sanctions and 1RR restriction on Richard Goldstone

As a result of an arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, broadly understood. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad editing restrictions, described here and below.

• Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process.
• The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project.
• Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines.
• Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently WP:AE), or the Committee.

These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions.

Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary.

This notice is only effective if given by an administrator and logged here.

• In relation to the above, you are informed that the Richard Goldstone article is under a blanket 1RR restriction and violations of this restriction will result in escalating blocks and/or topic/page bans. Thank you for your cooperation. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:35, 26 May 2010 (UTC)