| Revision as of 23:07, 24 May 2010 editChrisO~enwiki (talk | contribs)43,032 edits →Correction: - OK, don't worry about it - got any feedback on the new version?← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:47, 26 May 2010 edit undoHJ Mitchell (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators121,809 edits →Notification: General sanctions and 1RR restriction on Richard Goldstone: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| :Hey Chris, I'm sorry if I offended you -- I think you perhaps just misunderstood me, or I wasn't entirely clear. However, my opinion remains the same, and I've elaborated on it just a bit on HJ's talk page. Best — ]\<sup>]</sup> 22:25, 24 May 2010 (UTC) | :Hey Chris, I'm sorry if I offended you -- I think you perhaps just misunderstood me, or I wasn't entirely clear. However, my opinion remains the same, and I've elaborated on it just a bit on HJ's talk page. Best — ]\<sup>]</sup> 22:25, 24 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
| ::OK, don't worry about it - thanks for your comments about my revised version of the article. I've posted a request for feedback at ], if you would care to contribute there. -- ] (]) 23:07, 24 May 2010 (UTC) | ::OK, don't worry about it - thanks for your comments about my revised version of the article. I've posted a request for feedback at ], if you would care to contribute there. -- ] (]) 23:07, 24 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == Notification: General sanctions and 1RR restriction on ] == | |||
| <center>'''You are receiving this message because of your involvement at the ] article. Please don't consider it an assumption of bad faith'''</center> | |||
| As a result of ], the ] has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to the ], broadly understood. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad ], described ] and below. | |||
| *Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. | |||
| *The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project. | |||
| *Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines. | |||
| *Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently ]), or the Committee. | |||
| These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions. | |||
| Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary. | |||
| This notice is only effective if given by an administrator and logged ]. | |||
| *In relation to the above, you are informed that the ] article is under a blanket 1RR restriction and violations of this restriction will result in escalating blocks and/or topic/page bans. Thank you for your cooperation. ] | ] 21:47, 26 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:47, 26 May 2010
PLEASE ADD NEW COMMENTS TO THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE.
Re: BLP tag on Noor Einey
Hi. I just wanted to let you know that the BLP tag you placed at this article has been removed. It appears the article is not a BLP, but about a movie. Cleanup tags have been applied to it, and it will be listed for copyediting. Thanks for your understanding. BarkingFish | My contributions 22:18, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- No problem at all, it was my mistake. Thanks for taking the time to let me know, very decent of you. — e. ripley\ 22:47, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
In case you didn't see it...
Looks like both of us AFD'd diabetes control at the same time, and I just barely won! (Do I get a medal?) Anyway, I removed your AFD and moved the content to mine: Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Diabetes control. Enjoy. — Timneu22 · talk 13:42, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
- Ha! I didn't look at the one listed as first to see what date it was from, glad you caught that. — e. ripley\ 13:49, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks and....
does the E. stand for Ellen? :) Just wanted to say thanks for this. Kate sometimes takes a lot of eyes to keep its Good Article status. Thank you. Wildhartlivie (talk) 05:58, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Rags and Leathers Program
Sorry, didn't mean for my edit to be vandalism. Can you please add the tag at the top of the page that explains that references need to be added to the article. Thanks, and sorry again. Rags and Leathers Program —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.87.125.57 (talk) 12:48, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks
for the introduction and clarification :) --Brinchj (talk) 17:22, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Correction
I'm afraid you're wrong to say, as you did on HJ Mitchell's talk page, that nothing has been done to improve the article. I've spent a lot of time over the last week to rewrite and expand it considerably in my userspace - see User:ChrisO/Goldstone - to tackle some of the outstanding issues. I'm probably the only editor involved with the article to have done any significant work on it since it was protected. As such, your suggestion to extend the article protection was based on an erroneous assumption. I'd appreciate it if you could withdraw your objection on HJ's talk page to the article being unprotected. -- ChrisO (talk) 22:06, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
- Hey Chris, I'm sorry if I offended you -- I think you perhaps just misunderstood me, or I wasn't entirely clear. However, my opinion remains the same, and I've elaborated on it just a bit on HJ's talk page. Best — e. ripley\ 22:25, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
- OK, don't worry about it - thanks for your comments about my revised version of the article. I've posted a request for feedback at Talk:Richard Goldstone#New version, if you would care to contribute there. -- ChrisO (talk) 23:07, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Notification: General sanctions and 1RR restriction on Richard Goldstone
As a result of an arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, broadly understood. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad editing restrictions, described here and below.
- Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process.
- The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project.
- Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines.
- Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently WP:AE), or the Committee.
These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions.
Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary.
This notice is only effective if given by an administrator and logged here.
- In relation to the above, you are informed that the Richard Goldstone article is under a blanket 1RR restriction and violations of this restriction will result in escalating blocks and/or topic/page bans. Thank you for your cooperation. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:47, 26 May 2010 (UTC)