| Revision as of 13:21, 19 May 2010 editMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 25d) to User talk:Brewcrewer/Archives/2010/April, User talk:Brewcrewer/Archives/2010/March.← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:12, 26 May 2010 edit undoHJ Mitchell (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators121,809 edits →Notification: General sanctions and 1RR restriction on Richard Goldstone: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
| Done. Thanks for letting me know! —] <sup>(])</sup> 15:40, 18 May 2010 (UTC) | Done. Thanks for letting me know! —] <sup>(])</sup> 15:40, 18 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == Notification: General sanctions and 1RR restriction on ] == | |||
| <center>'''You are receiving this message because of your involvement at the ] article. Please don't consider it an assumption of bad faith'''</center> | |||
| As a result of ], the ] has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to the ], broadly understood. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad ], described ] and below. | |||
| *Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. | |||
| *The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project. | |||
| *Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines. | |||
| *Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently ]), or the Committee. | |||
| These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions. | |||
| Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary. | |||
| This notice is only effective if given by an administrator and logged ]. | |||
| *In relation to the above, you are informed that the ] article is under a blanket 1RR restriction and violations of this restriction will result in escalating blocks and/or topic/page bans. Thank you for your cooperation. ] | ] 22:12, 26 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:12, 26 May 2010
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Talkback You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Your questionHello Brewcrewer, first I would like to thank you for your input at my AE request yesterday. My method in finding those differences is simple. The only thing you need to know is the article's name, for which DYK was denied. Then you go to the article, see the date it was created (for example The Soap Myth was created in end of July 2009). Then you go to Gatoclass's contributions for those dates and look for the article name in those contributions. To look for the name you could either use cntrl/f or select edit/find from the Internet menu. I would have helped you with finding the differences, but I would not be surprised, if it might be considered as a topic ban violation. Please ask me, if you have more questions.Best wishes.--Mbz1 (talk) 01:23, 4 April 2010 (UTC) HeyoEverything is fine. I've just been extremely busy with work lately and really haven't had the time to engage in any productive editing. Your concern is appreciated and I'll be back soon.--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 15:50, 13 April 2010 (UTC) Thank youThank you for your warm welcoming. :)--SimplyNewbee (talk) 10:00, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
Re: TelemDone. Thanks for letting me know! —Ynhockey 15:40, 18 May 2010 (UTC) Notification: General sanctions and 1RR restriction on Richard GoldstoneAs a result of an arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, broadly understood. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad editing restrictions, described here and below.
These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions. Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary. This notice is only effective if given by an administrator and logged here.
|