Revision as of 04:24, 27 May 2010 editEdwardsBot (talk | contribs)354,693 edits →The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 24 May 2010: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:04, 27 May 2010 edit undoHJ Mitchell (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators121,809 edits →Notification: General sanctions and 1RR restriction on Richard Goldstone: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 169: | Line 169: | ||
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">''']''' · ] · ] · ] (]) 04:24, 27 May 2010 (UTC)</div> | <div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">''']''' · ] · ] · ] (]) 04:24, 27 May 2010 (UTC)</div> | ||
<!-- EdwardsBot 0048 --> | <!-- EdwardsBot 0048 --> | ||
== Notification: General sanctions and 1RR restriction on ] == | |||
<center>'''You are receiving this message because of your involvement at the ] article. Please don't consider it an assumption of bad faith'''</center> | |||
As a result of ], the ] has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to the ], broadly understood. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad ], described ] and below. | |||
*Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. | |||
*The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project. | |||
*Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines. | |||
*Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently ]), or the Committee. | |||
These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions. | |||
Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary. | |||
This notice is only effective if given by an administrator and logged ]. | |||
*In relation to the above, you are informed that the ] article is under a blanket 1RR restriction and violations of this restriction will result in escalating blocks and/or topic/page bans. Thank you for your cooperation.] | ] 16:04, 27 May 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:04, 27 May 2010
Archives | |||||||||||||||||
Index
|
|||||||||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Response
I have responded to your question regarding a third opinion. My answer can be found here. --User:Krator (t c)—Preceding comment was added at 12:28, 24 September 2007
I need to communicarte with you
I need to communicarte with you, a bit more privately than this page offers. Can you send your email to otherist@actcom.co.il and write in the subject line "Roland Rance address"? Thanks. Adam Keller —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adam Keller (talk • contribs) 11:01, 3 August 2008
Re: The Kafka Award
Thanks :) pedrito - talk - 06:01 18.05.2009
The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 26 April 2010
- From the team: Introducing Signpost Sidebars
- Museums conference: Wikimedians meet with museum leaders
- News and notes: Wikimedia announcements, Misplaced Pages advertising, and more!
- In the news: Making sausage, Jimmy Wales on TV, and more!
- Sister projects: Milestones, Openings, and Wikinews contest
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Gastropods
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Illan pappe
Just to let you know that Stellarkid has reverted you on this page. annoynmous 21:39, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks so much
That was, of course, perfectly helpful. I'm not one who subscribes to the (rather peculiar, IMHO, though it exists) view that it is a travesty if someone corrects my obvious mistake. Though I was criticized some time ago -- not by the poor speller, but by another editor -- for fixing a couple of spelling mistakes by a poor speller in a discussion I was party to (my spell-check didn't only turn up my errors).--Epeefleche (talk) 21:09, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 3 May 2010
- Book review: Review of The World and Misplaced Pages
- News and notes: iPhone app update, Vector rollout for May 13, brief news
- In the news: Government promotes Tamil Misplaced Pages, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject U.S. Roads
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Wanted: Wanted
Hi, Do you happen to have the Hebrew edition of the Lehi memoir "Wanted" by Yaacov Eliav? (I'm not sure of the Hebrew title.) There's an ambiguity in the English edition that should be clearer in the original. Thanks. Zero 03:18, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
- If I correctly identify it as בין אור וצל: סיפור it is only on Google in snippet view. Can you search as well, please, my Hebrew isn't up to it. Thanks. Zero 07:40, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
- On second thoughts, it is this book, the cover of the English edition looks nearly the same as shown at the Hebrew wiki page on Eliav. Or maybe they are different editions of the same book. I'm trying to determine how precisely he describes the document containing Lehi's offer to the Nazis; especially if says who wrote it. Zero 07:57, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
- You're right, it is the second. "Mevukash" means "Wanted". But the content is not viewable online. I also looked it up at WorldCat, and the nearest library to London that has it is at Jerusalem University!. RolandR (talk) 08:42, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
MfD
Your user subpage can be speedy deleted under {{db-userreq}} (since its under your userspace), and I have tagged it as such. If you want the MfD you created to be deleted, feel free to add {{db-author}} to it. Cheers, Cunard (talk) 00:09, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
- As far as I understand, since this was created as a sub-page to my talk page, it is not eligible for speedy deletion. RolandR (talk) 00:15, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
- You're right about {{db-userreq}} not being quite applicable; however, because no discussion occurred under the page, and because it was created without your consent, WP:IAR applies. If this happens in the future, feel free to tag the page under {{db-banned}}, since I am sure that certainly applies. Cheers, Cunard (talk) 00:21, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
- Please note that this vandal has created the same unwanted subpage at Harlan Wilkerson's and Taelus's talk pages. I assu,me that they doi not want them either. RolandR (talk) 00:27, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for telling me. I've tagged both of them for deletion under {{db-housekeeping}}. Cunard (talk) 00:34, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
- Please note that this vandal has created the same unwanted subpage at Harlan Wilkerson's and Taelus's talk pages. I assu,me that they doi not want them either. RolandR (talk) 00:27, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
- You're right about {{db-userreq}} not being quite applicable; however, because no discussion occurred under the page, and because it was created without your consent, WP:IAR applies. If this happens in the future, feel free to tag the page under {{db-banned}}, since I am sure that certainly applies. Cheers, Cunard (talk) 00:21, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
East Germany et al
This nonsense seems to have been going on for a few days now, and it looks like the user in question has a dynamic IP address. I'd be up for requesting semi-protection on the affected articles. (Ironically, I've just argued against protection - I'm not a huge fan). Cheers, TFOWR 17:04, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 10 May 2010
- From the editor: Reviewers and reporters wanted
- Commons deletions: Porn madness
- Misplaced Pages books launched: Misplaced Pages books launched worldwide
- News and notes: Public Policy and Books for All
- In the news: Commons pornography purge, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Birds
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
You should not revert other people's edits...
...before checking the SUMMARY!!!!
Please, read this essay when you get a moment.
Anyway, I removed the template from that page, and the wlink to Marx in the template, which was exactly what you had to do. –pjoef (talk • contribs) 15:02, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
- I don't understand what you are talking about. Please explain, don't hint. RolandR (talk) 16:14, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Abuse By a User
Hello, RolandR. You have new messages at Wikipedia_talk:Abuse_response.You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
RolandRock
After the user had an edit reverted by ClueBot, I just want to make sure it isn't more "Runt". mechamind90 06:35, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Scratch that, it was a false positive, but I'm still concerned about "Runt". mechamind90 06:37, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
MLH used an incorrect message
I noticed that Momma's Little Helper used an edit war message. That appeared to be incorrect, although such edits can lead to the assumption of ownership via rollback. mechamind90 17:55, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
MLH replied
Momma's Little Helper has left a reply to your three revert examples on my user talk page. I just want to make sure that unless users are actually talking to me, it will remain outside, so I suggest either posting the reply on your talk page or MLH's talk page. mechamind90 03:32, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
AIV
Hi,
hmm, MediaWiki was apparently confused, it claimed that it was still blocked, but you're right, that wasn't actually the case. I thought that only happens when the watchlists are also lagging, but apparently not. IP is blocked now.
Cheers, Amalthea 12:00, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
Feel free to list these at WP:OP if they're not hard-blocked for a long time. They're almost always open web proxies. -- zzuuzz 13:32, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
Got Yiddish?
Hey, Roland R.— I see that you're a translator that knows Hebrew. Do you do translations of Yiddish? I'm leerily circling a book project on American radicalism in the early 1920s and will be needing Yiddish-language translation help at some juncture. Drop me a line and say hello if you've got Yiddish in your arsenal. Best regards. Carrite (talk) 14:59, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 17 May 2010
- News and notes: Backstage at the British Museum
- In the news: In the news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Essays
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Hi
I wondered if you had read this article? And comment #32? Cheers, Huldra (talk) 19:48, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
- Yes. I wrote to them several days ago, asking them to remove it, but they have not replied. Such comments, purportedly in my name, are posted regularly to websites and blogs. Most are deleted quickly, but unfortunately many remain. And did you see comment #4? RolandR (talk) 19:54, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah; I gathered it was a fake one. And I saw #4; 60 000, and counting. But I don´t think it is "a group," do you? That "group" all operate at the same time of the day.... Cheers, Huldra (talk) 20:00, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
- And never on Friday night/Saturday. There has been no activity today either; perhaps because it was Shavuot? RolandR (talk) 20:03, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
- Also, 60,000 is a lie. More like 7500 quite enough, but far less than "they" lay claim to. If it is a Single Person, they must have plenty of time with not much to do. Sad, really. RolandR (talk) 20:05, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
- Well, there are 1094 IPs/names here: .. and 74 here: . That would mean 50-60 edits each, on average, if he was correct. Which is not probable at all. But yeah: certainly sad, and rather pathetic. And it of course works as a boomerang...Talking about shooting oneself in the foot, and all that. Cheers, Huldra (talk) 20:26, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah; I gathered it was a fake one. And I saw #4; 60 000, and counting. But I don´t think it is "a group," do you? That "group" all operate at the same time of the day.... Cheers, Huldra (talk) 20:00, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
new account
This account was created and in a few minites made four edits all to revert you. Off2riorob (talk) 23:45, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- Blocked, by zzuuzz. Amalthea 23:52, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
Request for MEDCAB Mediation
The request for mediation concerning Israel and the apartheid analogy, to which you were are a party, has been accepted. Please watchlist the case page (which is where the mediation will take place). If you have any questions, please contact me.
Ronk01 (talk) 03:10, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 24 May 2010
- News and notes: New puzzle globe, feature for admins, Israel's "Misplaced Pages Bill", unsourced bios declining
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Saints
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Notification: General sanctions and 1RR restriction on Richard Goldstone
As a result of an arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, broadly understood. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad editing restrictions, described here and below.
- Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process.
- The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project.
- Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines.
- Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently WP:AE), or the Committee.
These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions.
Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary.
This notice is only effective if given by an administrator and logged here.
- In relation to the above, you are informed that the Richard Goldstone article is under a blanket 1RR restriction and violations of this restriction will result in escalating blocks and/or topic/page bans. Thank you for your cooperation.HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:04, 27 May 2010 (UTC)